The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 7314·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 2, 2026

Advancing Commonsense Policies Act

IntroducedGovernment Operations and PoliticsOmnibus
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Magaziner, Seth [D-RI-2]
Committees
Budget Committee (primary)
Last action
May 20, 2026

Bottom line

This bill is a comprehensive legislative package addressing diverse policy areas from agriculture and veterans' affairs to retirement security, criminal justice, economic development, and federal appropriations.

What it actually does

This bill is a wide-ranging omnibus measure across 16 titles. It extends livestock mandatory reporting, expands apprenticeship education for veterans, modifies federal employee retirement systems for injured first responders, makes numerous changes to retirement savings plans (automatic enrollment, small employer credits, RMD age, catch-up limits, QLACs, overpayment rules, EPCRS, student loan matching, military spouse credits, hardship withdrawals, Roth options), reauthorizes the Boots to Business program for veterans, increases penalties for human trafficking and coercion in school zones, establishes a commission for an Asian Pacific American museum, promotes foreign direct investment in semiconductor manufacturing, updates equipment approval processes for homeland security grants, extends NASA's enhanced use leasing authority, mandates House committee hearings on the Act's implementation, reforms House ethics rules on whistleblower identity, mandates a study on foreign ownership of US ports, updates federal credit union board meeting frequency, and makes specific appropriations.

Proponents argue

Supporters would argue that the bill addresses a wide array of pressing national needs and improves various aspects of federal policy. They would highlight the extensions of critical programs, enhancements to retirement savings for individuals and small businesses, protections for vulnerable populations, and strategic investments in economic and national security. The bill's breadth allows for a comprehensive approach to policy challenges.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that the bill's omnibus nature makes it difficult to scrutinize individual provisions, potentially allowing controversial measures to pass without adequate debate. They might argue that some provisions are unnecessary, overly complex, or could have unintended negative consequences, particularly the extensive changes to retirement law or the specific appropriations.

The bill is lengthy and covers many complex topics, requiring significant time for thorough review, which may be challenging given typical legislative timelines.

Sec. 101, Title I

Livestock Mandatory Reporting Extension

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision extends the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 by one year, from 2024 to 2025. This act requires meatpackers to report prices, volumes, and other terms of livestock purchases to the USDA, which then disseminates this information to the public.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupLivestock producersImpactContinues market transparency and price reporting, aiding in fair price negotiation.MechanismScale
GroupMeatpackersImpactMaintains existing reporting requirements.MechanismScale
GroupUSDAImpactContinues its role in data collection and dissemination.MechanismScale

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that mandatory reporting provides crucial market transparency for livestock producers, helping them negotiate fair prices and make informed business decisions. A lapse in this authority would harm producers.

Critics contend

Some might argue that mandatory reporting creates unnecessary regulatory burdens for meatpackers or that the data collected does not significantly improve market efficiency or fairness.

Tradeoffs

Balances the desire for market transparency with potential regulatory burdens on industry.

Sec. 201, Sec. 202, Title II

Apprenticeship Information for Veterans

prominently featuredstraightforward

This title requires the Department of Defense to include information about registered apprenticeship programs in the Transition Assistance Program for separating service members. It also mandates the Department of Labor to create or update a user-friendly website for veterans to find searchable and sortable information on approved apprenticeship programs, including descriptions, costs, contact info, endorsements, veteran hiring preferences, and certifications earned.

Sec. 302, Title III

Retirement System Modifications for Injured Federal First Responders

prominently featuredhighly complex

This title amends the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), CIA Retirement Act, and Foreign Service Act. It allows certain federal first responders (e.g., law enforcement, firefighters, air traffic controllers) who are injured on duty and permanently unable to perform their covered position duties to retain their specialized retirement service credit if they transition to a non-covered position within the same agency without a significant break in service. This ensures they continue accruing benefits as if they were still in their original, more demanding role, under specific conditions.

Sec. 401, Title IV

Mandatory Automatic Enrollment for New Retirement Plans

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section mandates that new 401(k) and 403(b) plans must include an automatic enrollment feature. The initial default contribution rate must be between 3% and 10% of compensation, increasing by 1 percentage point annually to at least 10% but not more than 15% (with a temporary 10% cap until 2027). Employees retain the ability to opt out or choose a different contribution rate. Exceptions apply for simple plans, plans established before enactment, governmental and church plans, and new or small businesses (fewer than 11 employees).

Sec. 402, Title IV

Enhanced Tax Credit for Small Employer Pension Plan Startup Costs and Contributions

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section increases the tax credit for small employers (up to 50 employees) establishing new retirement plans from 50% to 100% of qualified startup costs. Additionally, it introduces a new credit for employer contributions to eligible plans, equal to an 'applicable percentage' (100% for the first year, phasing down to 0% by the fifth year) of contributions, capped at $1,000 per employee. This additional credit phases out for employers with more than 50 employees.

Sec. 406, Title IV

Gradual Increase in Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) Age to 75

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section gradually increases the age at which individuals must begin taking required minimum distributions (RMDs) from their retirement accounts. For individuals who attain age 72 after December 31, 2024, and age 73 before January 1, 2032, the applicable age is 73. For those attaining age 73 after December 31, 2031, and age 74 before January 1, 2035, the applicable age is 74. Finally, for individuals attaining age 74 after December 31, 2034, the applicable age is 75.

Sec. 411, Title IV

Employer Matching Contributions for Qualified Student Loan Payments

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section allows employers to make matching contributions to a defined contribution plan (including 401(k), 403(b), SIMPLE IRA, and 457(b) plans) on behalf of an employee who makes 'qualified student loan payments.' These payments are treated as elective deferrals for matching purposes, allowing employees to receive employer matching contributions even if they are prioritizing student loan repayment over direct retirement contributions. The provision includes non-discrimination rules and allows employers to rely on employee certification of payments.

Sec. 413, Title IV

Military Spouse Retirement Plan Eligibility Credit for Small Employers

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section creates a new general business tax credit for eligible small employers (up to 100 employees) that make military spouses eligible for their defined contribution plans earlier. The credit is $250 per military spouse employee, plus up to $250 for employer contributions made on their behalf. To qualify, military spouses must be eligible to participate within 2 months of employment and receive immediate vesting and contributions comparable to a non-military spouse with 2 years of service. The credit applies for the year of participation and the two succeeding taxable years.

Sec. 422, Title IV

Special Rules for Retirement Plan Overpayments

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section establishes new rules for how retirement plans must handle inadvertent benefit overpayments under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. It allows plan fiduciaries discretion not to seek recovery of overpayments from participants or beneficiaries, or from plan sponsors/employers under certain conditions. If recoupment is sought from a participant, strict conditions apply, including no interest, a 10% annual recoupment limit on future payments, and a 3-year lookback period. These rules do not apply if the participant is culpable for the overpayment.

Sec. 426, Title IV

Eliminating Unnecessary Disclosure Requirements for Unenrolled Participants

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section amends ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code to reduce disclosure requirements for 'unenrolled participants' in individual account plans (like 401(k)s). An unenrolled participant is an eligible employee who has received initial eligibility notices but is not participating and has no account balance. For these individuals, plans would only need to provide an annual reminder notice of eligibility and election deadlines, plus any documents specifically requested by the participant, rather than all standard disclosures.

Sec. 427, Title IV

Establishment of Retirement Savings Lost and Found Database

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section mandates the Department of Labor to establish an online searchable database, the 'Retirement Savings Lost and Found,' within two years. This database will allow individuals to locate administrators and contact information for pension plans where they are or were participants or beneficiaries, helping them recover lost benefits. Plan administrators will be required to submit specific participant and plan information to the Department of Labor for this purpose, and the Inspector General will conduct regular audits.

Sec. 429, Title IV

Expansion of Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS)

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section expands the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS) to allow for self-correction of eligible inadvertent failures in various retirement plans (401(a), 403(a), 403(b), 408(p), 408(k)) for an indefinite period, unless the failure was identified by the Secretary. It specifically addresses loan errors, allowing self-correction under EPCRS and treating it as meeting Department of Labor's Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program. It also mandates the expansion of EPCRS to cover individual retirement plans (IRAs), including waivers for excise taxes and missed rollover deadlines, and to provide additional safe harbors for corrections.

Sec. 439, Title IV

Penalty-Free Withdrawals for Domestic Abuse Victims

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section allows individuals who are victims of domestic abuse by a spouse or domestic partner to make penalty-free withdrawals of up to $10,000 (or 50% of their nonforfeitable accrued benefit, if less) from applicable eligible retirement plans. The distribution must occur within a 1-year period beginning on any date the individual is a victim of domestic abuse. The withdrawn amount can be repaid to a retirement plan within 3 years. Plans can rely on employee self-certification for these distributions.

Sec. 447, Title IV

Simple and SEP Roth IRAs

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section allows Simplified Employee Pensions (SEPs) and Savings Incentive Match Plans for Employees (SIMPLE) IRAs to be designated as Roth IRAs. This means contributions to these accounts would be made with after-tax dollars, and qualified distributions in retirement would be tax-free. Employees must elect for their plan to be treated as a Roth IRA. It also includes rules for rollovers and coordination with Roth contribution limitations.

Sec. 449, Title IV

Elective Deferrals Generally Limited to Roth Contributions for Catch-Up

buried in fine printmoderately complex

This section amends the Internal Revenue Code to generally limit catch-up contributions (additional contributions allowed for individuals aged 50 and over) to designated Roth contributions for applicable employer plans, with an exception for certain governmental plans. This means that for most plans, catch-up contributions would have to be made with after-tax dollars, rather than pre-tax dollars.

Sec. 501, Title V

Reauthorization and Expansion of Boots to Business Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This title reauthorizes the Small Business Administration's 'Boots to Business Program' until September 30, 2028. The program provides entrepreneurship training to service members, veterans, and their spouses/dependents, with goals to provide in-depth training on business ownership, planning, capital, and local resources. It outlines program components, collaboration requirements with other agencies, and mandates regular reports on performance and effectiveness.

Sec. 601, Sec. 602, Title VI

Enhanced Penalties for Human Trafficking and Coercion in School Zones

prominently featuredstraightforward

This title increases the maximum prison sentence by up to 5 years for individuals who commit human trafficking (Section 1591 of title 18, U.S. Code) or coercion and enticement (Section 2422 of title 18, U.S. Code) in a school zone, or within 1,000 feet of a school-sponsored activity or institution of higher education. The enhanced penalties apply to offenses against minors (under 18) for coercion and enticement.

Sec. 701-703, Title VII

Commission to Study National Asian Pacific American Museum

prominently featuredstraightforward

This title establishes an 8-member Commission to study the feasibility of creating a National Museum of Asian Pacific American History and Culture in Washington, DC. The Commission is tasked with reporting on a plan of action, including collection availability, location criteria, governance, fundraising, and legislative recommendations. It explicitly states that no federal funds may be obligated for the Commission, which must rely on gifts and bequests.

Sec. 801-804, Title VIII

Promoting Semiconductor Manufacturing Investment

prominently featuredstraightforward

This title focuses on increasing foreign direct investment (FDI) in the U.S. semiconductor supply chain. It defines 'SelectUSA' and outlines findings on the importance of semiconductors for economic and national security. It directs SelectUSA to solicit comments from state-level economic development organizations on how to support increased FDI in semiconductor production, identify barriers, and develop recommendations. SelectUSA must then report to Congress on its activities and strategies to achieve this goal, including working with allies to prevent foreign adversaries from benefiting.

Sec. 901, Title IX

Homeland Security Grant Equipment Approval Process

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This title amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require the FEMA Administrator to implement uniform processes for reviewing applications for grants (under sections 2003 or 2004) to purchase equipment or systems that either do not meet national voluntary consensus standards or are not on the Authorized Equipment List. The review process must consider factors like federal agency use, absence of national standards, existence of international standards, capability gaps, and comparative effectiveness. It also mandates an Inspector General report on the implementation of this review process.

Sec. 1002, Title X

NASA Enhanced Use Leasing Authority Extension

prominently featuredstraightforward

This title extends NASA's authority to enter into enhanced use leases of non-excess, underutilized properties and facilities by one year, from December 31, 2032, to December 31, 2033. The findings section highlights that this authority helps NASA manage real property, improve use of underutilized assets, reduce operating costs, and generate revenue for facility repairs.

Sec. 1101, Title XI

Mandate for House Committee Hearings on Act Implementation

prominently featuredstraightforward

This title mandates that each standing committee of the House of Representatives hold a hearing on the implementation of this Act within one year of its enactment. It specifies that this is an exercise of House rulemaking power.

Sec. 1201, Title XII

Whistleblower Protection in House Rules

prominently featuredstraightforward

This title amends Rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit Members, Delegates, Resident Commissioners, officers, or employees of the House from knowingly and willfully disclosing publicly the identity or personally identifiable information of individuals who report allegations of wrongdoing under federal whistleblower protection laws. Exceptions are provided for express written consent, voluntary public disclosure by the individual, or an affirmative two-thirds vote by a committee chair with advance notice to the individual.

Sec. 1301, Title XIII

Study on Foreign Ownership of U.S. Container Ports

prominently featuredstraightforward

This title directs the Chairman of the Federal Maritime Commission to seek an agreement with a federally funded research and development center to study how foreign ownership of marine terminals at the 15 largest U.S. container ports affects or could affect U.S. economic security. The study must consider ownership changes, Chinese/Russian ownership, overall foreign ownership, federal grant funding to foreign-owned ports, and operational control, and offer recommendations on policies to prevent excessive foreign ownership and address supply chain impacts. A report to Congress is required within one year.

Sec. 1501, Title XV

Federal Credit Union Board Meeting Frequency

prominently featuredstraightforward

This title amends the Federal Credit Union Act to revise the required frequency of board of directors meetings for federal credit unions. De novo credit unions must meet monthly for their first five years. Credit unions with strong financial and management ratings (1 or 2 under UFIRS) must meet at least six times annually, with at least one meeting per fiscal quarter. Credit unions with weaker ratings (3, 4, or 5) must meet at least monthly.

Sec. 1601, Title XVI

Specific Appropriations for Various Agencies

prominently featuredstraightforward

This title appropriates additional funds for several federal agencies for fiscal year 2026. Specific allocations include: $1,000,000 for HRSA's Telehealth Resource Center, $1,000,000 for USDA's Office of Budget and Program Analysis, $1,000,000 for the State Department's Capital Investment Fund, $1,000,000 for Army Operation and Maintenance, $1,000,000 for DHS Management Directorate, and $1,000,000 for DOE's Energy Information Administration.

FOUND

Generally limits catch-up contributions (for individuals aged 50 and over) to designated Roth contributions for applicable employer plans, with an exception for certain governmental plans.

Sec. 414(v)(1) and 402(g)(1)(C), Title IV

Why it matters:This is a substantively consequential change with direct tax implications for older workers, and its placement within a broad omnibus bill, rather than as a standalone tax policy change, could reduce public and legislative scrutiny. It could be seen as a revenue-raising measure that might face more opposition if highlighted.

Case for: Proponents might argue that this simplifies tax administration by standardizing catch-up contributions as Roth, or that it aligns with a broader policy goal of increasing after-tax savings, which can be beneficial for future tax-free withdrawals.

Case against: Critics would argue that this provision removes a valuable pre-tax savings option for older workers, potentially increasing their current tax burden and reducing their flexibility in retirement tax planning. It could be seen as a revenue-raising measure that might face more opposition if highlighted.

Estimated impact: Potentially shifts a significant portion of catch-up contributions from pre-tax to after-tax, impacting current federal tax revenue and individuals' future tax liabilities.

FOUND

Reforms family attribution rules for controlled groups and affiliated service groups under sections 414(b) and 414(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, specifically regarding how stock ownership is attributed among family members for purposes of determining whether entities are treated as a single employer for retirement plan rules.

Sec. 440, Title IV

Why it matters:The technical nature of attribution rules means changes are often placed deep within tax legislation. While not necessarily evasive, its complexity makes it difficult for a casual reader to grasp its implications for small business owners and their retirement plans.

Case for: Proponents argue that the existing family attribution rules can be overly broad and create unintended compliance burdens for small, family-owned businesses, making it difficult for them to maintain qualified retirement plans. These reforms aim to provide relief and simplify compliance.

Case against: Critics might argue that loosening attribution rules could allow some businesses to circumvent non-discrimination requirements for retirement plans, potentially benefiting highly compensated employees more than rank-and-file workers.

Estimated impact: Could significantly impact the ability of certain family-owned businesses to maintain or establish qualified retirement plans, potentially reducing compliance burdens for some while possibly affecting non-discrimination testing for others.

FOUND

Clarifies that the credit for small employer pension plan startup costs applies 'effective with respect to the eligible employer' when joining an existing plan, and has a retroactive effective date as if included in the enactment of the SECURE Act of 2019.

Sec. 412, Title IV

Why it matters:Technical corrections to prior legislation are often included in larger bills to clean up ambiguities or unintended consequences. The retroactive effective date ensures that the intended policy from the SECURE Act is applied correctly from its original enactment.

Case for: Proponents argue that this correction ensures small employers receive the intended tax credit when joining existing plans, which was the original intent of the SECURE Act, thereby encouraging more small businesses to offer retirement benefits.

Case against: No specific opposition is typically raised against technical corrections that clarify legislative intent, as they are generally seen as non-controversial administrative fixes.

Estimated impact: Clarifies eligibility for a tax credit, potentially allowing more small employers to claim it, leading to a minor, likely positive, impact on small business finances and a minor, likely negative, impact on federal revenue.

FOUND

Amends the Internal Revenue Code to limit the repayment period for qualified birth or adoption distributions to 3 years, effective as if included in the enactment of the SECURE Act of 2019.

Sec. 437, Title IV

Why it matters:Technical corrections to prior legislation are often included in larger bills to clean up ambiguities or unintended consequences. The retroactive effective date ensures that the intended policy from the SECURE Act is applied correctly from its original enactment.

Case for: Proponents argue that this correction clarifies the repayment period for birth or adoption distributions, providing certainty for taxpayers and plan administrators, which was the original intent of the SECURE Act.

Case against: No specific opposition is typically raised against technical corrections that clarify legislative intent, as they are generally seen as non-controversial administrative fixes.

Estimated impact: Clarifies the rules for repaying birth or adoption distributions, ensuring consistent application of tax law for individuals who took such distributions.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
  • Riders
  • Tactical maneuvers
  • Process critique
  • Transparency
Ask Ledger AI about this