The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 7331·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 3, 2026

Dakota Mainstem Water Supply Project Feasibility Study Act

IntroducedWater Resources DevelopmentSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Johnson, Dusty [R-SD-At Large]
Committees
Natural Resources Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 29, 2026

Bottom line

The bill funds a federal study to explore the feasibility of a multi-state water supply project, with a 50% federal cost share for the study itself.

What it actually does

This bill authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a feasibility study for a project to supply municipal, rural, and industrial water to the Dakota Mainstem Regional Water System service area, which spans parts of South Dakota, Iowa, Nebraska, and Minnesota. The study, conducted in cooperation with the Dakota Mainstem Regional Water System, Inc., would determine the viability of constructing such a project and must adhere to federal reclamation feasibility standards. The federal government would cover up to 50 percent of the study's costs, with $10,000,000 authorized for appropriations.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill addresses critical water supply needs in a multi-state region, ensuring a reliable source of municipal, rural, and industrial water for communities facing potential shortages or quality issues. They contend that a federal feasibility study is a necessary first step to assess the technical and economic viability of such a large-scale project, leveraging federal expertise and resources to benefit regional development and public health. Furthermore, the cost-sharing mechanism demonstrates a commitment from local entities, ensuring prudent use of federal funds.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while water infrastructure is important, authorizing a study with a significant federal appropriation for a project that may or may not be deemed feasible represents a premature commitment of taxpayer dollars. They could contend that local and state governments should bear a greater share of the initial study costs, given the direct benefits to their constituents. Concerns might also be raised about the potential long-term federal financial obligations if the study recommends construction, without a clear plan for full project funding at this stage.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for a reader to understand its core purpose and provisions quickly.

Section 3(a)(1)

Feasibility Study Authorization

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study. This study will assess whether it is feasible to build a project that would supply water for cities, rural areas, and industries within the service area of the Dakota Mainstem Regional Water System. This service area covers parts of South Dakota, Iowa, Nebraska, and Minnesota. The study will be done in cooperation with the Dakota Mainstem Regional Water System, Inc., a non-profit corporation.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupSecretary of the InteriorImpactRequired to conduct a studyMechanismDirect mandateScaleOperational
GroupDakota Mainstem Regional Water System, Inc.ImpactConsulted and cooperates on the studyMechanismCooperative agreementScaleOperational
GroupResidents and industries in South Dakota, Iowa, Nebraska, and MinnesotaImpactPotential future access to improved water supplyMechanismFeasibility study for a water projectScaleRegional

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this study is a crucial first step to address long-term water security for a significant multi-state region. They contend that a comprehensive federal assessment is necessary to determine the most effective and sustainable solutions for municipal, rural, and industrial water needs, ensuring future economic stability and public health.

Critics contend

Critics might suggest that while water supply is important, initiating a federal study for a potentially massive project without a clearer understanding of local commitment or alternative solutions could lead to unfunded mandates or misdirected federal resources. They may argue that local entities should fully fund initial exploratory work before federal involvement.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the need for federal expertise and resources in addressing large-scale regional water challenges against concerns about federal overreach or premature investment in projects that may not ultimately be constructed. It also highlights the tension between immediate study costs and potential long-term benefits of a robust water infrastructure.

Section 3(b) and (c)

Federal Share and Authorization of Appropriations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section specifies the financial aspects of the feasibility study. It states that the federal government will cover no more than 50 percent of the total costs for carrying out the study. To fund this federal share, the bill authorizes an appropriation of $10,000,000 to the Secretary of the Interior. This means Congress can allocate up to this amount for the study, but it does not guarantee the funds will be appropriated.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this