The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 7488·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 11, 2026

CFTC Office of the Chief Economist Act of 2026

IntroducedFinance and Financial SectorSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Bresnahan, Robert P. [R-PA-8]
Committees
Agriculture Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 20, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to enhance the CFTC's economic analysis capabilities and regulatory decision-making by creating a dedicated Office of the Chief Economist with specialized staffing authority.

What it actually does

This bill establishes an Office of the Chief Economist (OCE) within the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The OCE will be headed by a Chief Economist who will serve as an economic advisor to the Commission, performing economic analysis, regulatory cost-benefit analysis, and research. It also grants the CFTC specific authority to appoint professional staff to the OCE using excepted service rules for competitive service positions and expands the scope of required cost-benefit analysis to include market liquidity and all markets under the Commission's jurisdiction.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that establishing a dedicated Office of the Chief Economist will significantly strengthen the CFTC's capacity for data-driven decision-making and robust economic analysis, which is crucial for effective regulation of increasingly complex and rapidly evolving financial markets. They contend that the ability to hire specialized staff through flexible appointment authorities will ensure the office can attract top talent quickly, improving the quality and timeliness of economic advice.

Opponents contend

Opponents might raise concerns about the potential for increased bureaucratic bloat and redundant functions within the CFTC, questioning whether existing economic expertise is sufficiently utilized or if a new office is truly necessary. They could also argue that granting excepted service appointment authority for competitive service positions might bypass standard merit-based hiring processes, potentially leading to less transparent or less diverse staffing.

The bill is concise and clearly written, making it accessible for a quick and informed review by any interested reader.

Section 2(a) amending 7 U.S.C. 2(a)

Establishment of the Office of the Chief Economist (OCE)

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision formally creates a new office within the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) called the Office of the Chief Economist. This office will be led by a Chief Economist whose primary responsibilities include providing economic advice to the Commission, conducting economic analysis, performing cost-benefit analyses for regulations, and engaging in research related to the markets under the CFTC's jurisdiction. This centralizes and formalizes the economic advisory function within the agency.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCommodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)ImpactEnhanced internal economic analysis capabilities and formalized advisory structure.MechanismCreation of a new dedicated office and role.ScaleAgency-wide
GroupFinancial markets and participantsImpactPotentially more economically informed and efficient regulation.MechanismImproved regulatory analysis leading to better rules.ScaleBroad

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that a dedicated OCE will provide a consistent and high-level source of economic expertise, ensuring that CFTC regulations are grounded in sound economic principles and robust data analysis. This will lead to more effective and less burdensome rules for market participants.

Critics contend

Critics might suggest that existing CFTC divisions already possess economic expertise, and creating a new, separate office could lead to redundancy or internal turf battles, potentially hindering rather than streamlining regulatory processes.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the need for specialized economic expertise with concerns about organizational structure and potential duplication of efforts within a federal agency.

Section 2(a)(16)(D)

Professional Staff Appointment Authority for OCE

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section grants the CFTC specific authority to hire professional staff for the Office of the Chief Economist. It allows for appointments to positions like economists, research analysts, data specialists, or those with specialized market knowledge, using 'excepted service' rules. Crucially, while the hiring process is more flexible, the positions themselves remain within the 'competitive service,' meaning they retain the protections and benefits associated with that status, rather than converting to excepted service.

Section 2(b) amending 7 U.S.C. 19(a)

Expanded Scope of Cost-Benefit Analysis and Coordination

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This amendment modifies the Commodity Exchange Act to require the CFTC to coordinate with the newly established Office of the Chief Economist when conducting cost-benefit analyses for proposed rules. It also broadens the scope of these analyses, mandating that the CFTC consider impacts across all 'markets under the jurisdiction of the Commission' (not just futures markets) and specifically include 'considerations of market liquidity' in its assessments. This ensures a more comprehensive and economically informed approach to rulemaking.

FOUND

This clause specifies that the appointment of a candidate to a position under the new flexible authority for the Office of the Chief Economist shall not cause that position to be converted from the competitive service to the excepted service.

Section 2(a)(16)(D)(iii)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to clarify the legal status of positions when special hiring authorities are granted, ensuring that the intent regarding civil service protections is explicit.

Case for: Supporters would argue that this clause is crucial for ensuring that while the hiring process is streamlined, the employees hired into these specialized roles still benefit from the protections and career paths associated with competitive service positions, making the roles more attractive to qualified candidates.

Case against: No direct case against this specific clarification, as it aims to protect employee status. However, critics of the broader flexible hiring authority might see it as an attempt to mitigate concerns about bypassing standard processes without fully addressing them.

Estimated impact: Ensures that specialized staff hired for the OCE retain competitive service status, impacting their employment rights and benefits.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this