The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 7512·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 11, 2026

Preserving Counterterrorism Capabilities Act of 2026

IntroducedArmed Forces and National SecuritySubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Ogles, Andrew [R-TN-5]
Committees
Homeland Security Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 12, 2026

Bottom line

The bill ensures the continued operation of the DHS Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office by extending its authorization for approximately one year.

What it actually does

This bill extends the statutory authorization for the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD) Office. It specifically amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to change the office's expiration date from one tied to the 2018 Act to a fixed date of February 28, 2027, thereby preventing an immediate lapse in its operational authority.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the CWMD Office is indispensable for national security, coordinating critical efforts to prevent, detect, and respond to weapons of mass destruction threats. Extending its authorization is essential to maintain these vital capabilities without interruption, ensuring continuity in protecting the homeland from catastrophic attacks and preserving existing counterterrorism infrastructure.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that a simple, short-term extension without a comprehensive review of the CWMD Office's effectiveness, budget, and mission scope represents a missed opportunity for necessary oversight. They could argue that Congress should re-evaluate the office's activities to ensure efficiency and alignment with evolving threat landscapes, rather than merely granting a temporary renewal.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it very easy for any reader to understand its core purpose quickly and assess its implications.

Section 2

Extension of Authorization for Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends Section 1901 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to modify the expiration date of the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD) Office's authorization. Previously, the office's authorization was set to expire based on a calculation from the enactment date of the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Act of 2018. This bill replaces that language with a specific expiration date of February 28, 2027, ensuring the office can continue its operations without a lapse in statutory authority and maintaining its critical national security functions.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD) OfficeImpactContinued operation and fundingMechanismStatutory authorization extension, preventing immediate expirationScaleEnsures the continuity of a key national security office responsible for WMD threat mitigation.
GroupU.S. National Security ApparatusImpactMaintenance of WMD counter-proliferation and response capabilitiesMechanismContinued CWMD office functions, including coordination and intelligence sharingScaleSustains a critical component of homeland defense against catastrophic threats.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this extension is crucial for national security, allowing the CWMD Office to continue its vital work in preventing, detecting, and responding to WMD threats without interruption. A lapse in authorization could disrupt critical programs and personnel, weakening the nation's defense against catastrophic attacks and creating vulnerabilities.

Critics contend

Some might argue that while the office's mission is important, a simple extension avoids necessary oversight and evaluation. They could contend that Congress should conduct a thorough review of the CWMD Office's performance, budget, and strategic alignment before granting further authorization, rather than a short-term, unexamined renewal.

Tradeoffs

The bill prioritizes the immediate continuity of operations and ongoing threat mitigation efforts over a potentially lengthy and disruptive re-evaluation process for the CWMD Office. This balances the imperative for uninterrupted security functions against the desire for comprehensive legislative oversight and potential reform.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this