3 versions

CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Jun 8, 2026)

Technical and procedural changes only. v3 reflects the bill's referral to the Senate on June 9, 2026, after passing the House of Representatives on June 8, 2026, and includes the name of the House Clerk. There are no substantive policy changes to the legislative text between v2 and v3.

H.R. 7668119th CongressIntroduced Feb 24, 2026

Countering China’s Control of the Caucasus Act

Passed HouseInternational AffairsSubstantive

View bill text

Sponsor: Rep. Wilson, Joe [R-SC-2]
Committees: Foreign Relations Committee (primary)
Last action: Jun 9, 2026

Bottom line

The bill requires the US government to assess and strategize its approach to Georgia, focusing on countering Russian and Chinese influence and evaluating the effectiveness of current US engagement and aid.

What it actually does

This bill mandates two key reports from the executive branch to Congress within 180 days of enactment. First, it requires a classified report from the Secretary of State, Director of National Intelligence, and Secretary of Defense on Russian and Chinese intelligence penetration and cooperation in Georgia. Second, it requires the Secretary of State to submit a detailed, unclassified 5-year strategy for bilateral relations with Georgia, including assessments of US investment, funding levels, and Georgia's commitment to trade ties.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that a thorough understanding of Russian and Chinese intelligence activities in Georgia is critical for safeguarding US interests and regional stability. They contend that a comprehensive, forward-looking strategy for bilateral relations is essential to ensure US foreign aid and diplomatic efforts are effective, especially given the evolving geopolitical landscape and Georgia's domestic political environment.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that these reports and strategies could be redundant with ongoing intelligence gathering and diplomatic efforts, potentially diverting resources without providing significantly new insights. Some may also express concern that questioning Georgia's status as a top aid recipient could be perceived negatively by the Georgian government, potentially undermining existing partnerships or creating instability.

The bill text is very short and can be read quickly, allowing ample time for informed evaluation of its directives.

Section 2(a)

Report on Russian and Chinese Intelligence Assets in Georgia

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense, to submit a classified report to specific congressional committees within 180 days. The report must detail the extent of Russian and Chinese intelligence penetration and assets within Georgia, as well as examine any potential collaboration or intersection of their influence in the country. This aims to provide Congress with a clearer picture of adversary activities in a strategically important region.

GroupImpactMechanismScale

GroupU.S. Intelligence Community and State DepartmentImpactIncreased workload and reporting requirementsMechanismMandated report creation and submissionScaleDirect, administrative

GroupU.S. Congress (relevant committees)ImpactEnhanced oversight and intelligence briefingMechanismReceipt of classified reportScaleDirect, informational

GroupGovernment of GeorgiaImpactPotential scrutiny and implications for bilateral relationsMechanismSubject of intelligence assessmentScaleIndirect, diplomatic

Supporters argue

Proponents argue this report is essential for understanding and countering malign foreign influence in a critical region, enabling better-informed US foreign policy decisions and resource allocation to support Georgia's sovereignty and democratic development.

Critics contend

Opponents might argue that such intelligence gathering is already ongoing and that a specific congressional mandate could be seen as micromanaging intelligence operations or potentially straining diplomatic relations with Georgia if perceived as an indictment of their security apparatus.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the need for comprehensive intelligence on adversary activities with potential sensitivities regarding the sovereignty and internal affairs of a partner nation. It also involves resource allocation within intelligence agencies for a specific, mandated report.

Section 2(b)

5-Year United States Strategy for Bilateral Relations With Georgia

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision directs the Secretary of State to develop and submit a detailed 5-year strategy for US bilateral relations with Georgia to relevant congressional committees within 180 days. The strategy must outline specific objectives, assess the necessary tools and funding, determine whether Georgia should remain a top recipient of US funding in the region, evaluate the extent of continued US investment in the partnership, and assess Georgia's commitment to expanding trade ties with the US and Europe. The report will be unclassified with a classified annex.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.