The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 7678·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 25, 2026

Gun Owner Registration Information Protection Act

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Gosar, Paul A. [R-AZ-9]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 25, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to prevent federal funds from being used to create or maintain state-level registries of legal firearm ownership, while still permitting federal support for tracking lost or stolen firearms.

What it actually does

This bill prohibits any federal agency from providing funding or other support to states or their political subdivisions for the establishment or maintenance of databases that list lawfully owned firearms or individuals who lawfully own them. It explicitly carves out an exception, allowing federal support for databases that track firearms reported as lost or stolen, or individuals who reported them as such.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill is essential for protecting the Second Amendment rights and privacy of law-abiding citizens by preventing the federal government from facilitating state-level firearm registration, which they view as a precursor to confiscation. They contend it safeguards sensitive personal information from potential misuse by government entities.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that prohibiting federal funding for such databases could hinder states' ability to implement public safety measures they deem necessary, potentially limiting their capacity to track firearms involved in crimes or to manage gun violence data effectively. They may also assert it restricts federal support for legitimate state efforts to enhance public safety.

The bill is exceptionally short and clearly written, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its core provisions quickly and efficiently.

Section 2(b)

Prohibition on Federal Funding for State Firearm Ownership Databases

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision explicitly forbids any federal agency from providing financial assistance or other forms of support to states or their political subdivisions for the creation or upkeep of databases that record lawfully owned firearms or the individuals who lawfully own them. This means federal dollars cannot be used to help states build or maintain registries of gun owners or their legal firearms, aiming to prevent federal entanglement in such state-level data collection efforts.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState and local governmentsImpactRestricted funding and support for certain data collection activitiesMechanismFederal agencies are prohibited from providing funds or support for firearm ownership databases.ScalePotentially significant for states that might consider or currently rely on federal grants for data management related to firearm ownership.
GroupLaw-abiding firearm ownersImpactEnhanced privacy protection and reduced risk of government registrationMechanismPrevents federal facilitation of state databases that could track lawful firearm ownership.ScaleBroad impact on privacy concerns nationwide for individuals who lawfully own firearms.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is crucial for protecting the privacy and Second Amendment rights of firearm owners by preventing federal entanglement in state-level registration efforts, which they often view as an infringement on constitutional liberties. They believe it prevents the creation of lists that could be misused or lead to confiscation.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that this prohibition unnecessarily restricts states' autonomy and ability to implement public safety measures they deem appropriate, potentially hindering efforts to track firearms involved in crime or manage gun violence data effectively. They may argue it ties the hands of states that wish to pursue such databases.

Tradeoffs

The bill navigates the tension between federal non-interference in state policy and the protection of individual rights. It balances the federal government's role in supporting state initiatives against concerns about individual privacy and Second Amendment rights regarding firearm ownership.

Section 2(c)

Exception for Lost or Stolen Firearm Databases

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This subsection clarifies that the prohibition on federal funding does not apply to state or local databases specifically designed to list firearms that have been reported as lost or stolen, or to list individuals who have reported their firearms as lost or stolen. This ensures that federal support can still be provided for legitimate law enforcement efforts to track and recover illegally obtained firearms, distinguishing these from databases of lawful ownership.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this