The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 7679·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 25, 2026

CAR SEAT Act

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Gillen, Laura [D-NY-4]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 26, 2026

Bottom line

This bill aims to enhance child safety on roads by funding a public education campaign and integrating related awareness efforts into existing highway safety programs, focusing on identifying and avoiding non-compliant car seats.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the Secretary of Transportation to launch a public education campaign within one year to inform the public about the dangers of noncompliant or counterfeit child car seats and booster seats, and how to identify and avoid them. It also amends federal highway safety programs to explicitly include public information and education activities related to these unsafe child restraint systems, allowing states to use federal funds for such efforts. The bill authorizes $1,500,000 for the federal education campaign.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill is a crucial step to protect children by informing parents and caregivers about the risks of unsafe child restraint systems. They contend that counterfeit or noncompliant car seats pose a significant, often unrecognized, danger, and a targeted education campaign, coupled with integration into existing safety programs, will save lives and prevent injuries by empowering consumers to make safer choices.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the intent is commendable, the allocated funding of $1.5 million might be insufficient for a truly effective nationwide campaign, potentially limiting its reach and impact. Some may also contend that existing safety programs already cover general child passenger safety, making this a potentially redundant or inefficient use of resources without clearer evidence of the specific scale of the counterfeit product problem.

The bill is exceptionally short and straightforward, allowing for quick and complete comprehension by any interested reader.

Section 2(a)

Mandate for an Education Campaign on Noncompliant Child Restraint Systems

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the Secretary of Transportation to create and implement a public education campaign within one year of the bill's enactment. The campaign will inform the public about the dangers of child car seats and booster seats that do not meet federal safety standards (specifically 49 CFR 571.213 and 571.213b) and teach consumers how to identify and avoid such unsafe products.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupParents, guardians, and caregivers of young childrenImpactIncreased awareness and knowledge about child car seat safety, potentially leading to safer purchasing decisions and reduced risk of injury or fatality.MechanismPublic information and education campaign.ScaleNational, targeting a broad demographic.
GroupManufacturers and retailers of compliant child restraint systemsImpactPotential increase in demand for compliant products and a decrease in demand for non-compliant or counterfeit products due to informed consumer choices.MechanismConsumer education and market shift.ScaleNational market.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that this campaign directly addresses a critical public safety gap, as many consumers may be unaware of the prevalence or dangers of counterfeit child restraint systems. They believe that direct, targeted education is the most effective way to empower parents to make safe choices and protect their children.

Critics contend

Opponents might suggest that while education is valuable, the problem of counterfeit products might be better addressed through stricter enforcement, supply chain regulations, or international cooperation, rather than solely relying on consumer education which may not reach all vulnerable populations effectively.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between proactive consumer education and reactive regulatory enforcement. While education is empowering, it places the burden of identification on the consumer, rather than solely preventing unsafe products from entering the market.

Section 2(b)

Authorization of Appropriations for Education Campaign

prominently featuredstraightforward

This subsection authorizes an appropriation of $1,500,000 to the Secretary of Transportation specifically for carrying out the education campaign described in Section 2(a). The funds are to remain available until expended, meaning they do not expire at the end of a fiscal year.

Section 3

Inclusion of Child Restraint Safety Education in Highway Safety Programs

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends Section 402(a)(2)(A)(iii) of title 23, United States Code, which governs highway safety programs. It expands the authorized activities under these programs to explicitly include "public information and education activities related to the dangers associated with noncompliant or counterfeit child restraint systems... and methods for identifying such products." This means states can use federal highway safety funds for these specific educational efforts.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this