Stop Illegal Alien Cops Act
- Sponsor
- Rep. Miller, Mary E. [R-IL-15]
- Committees
- Judiciary Committee (primary)
- Last action
- Feb 25, 2026
Bottom line
This bill expands federal prohibitions on firearm and ammunition possession by certain aliens to explicitly cover their use by government entities, aiming to prevent federal, state, and local agencies from arming individuals who are unlawfully present or on certain nonimmigrant visas.
What it actually does
This bill amends Section 925(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, to expand the categories of aliens whose possession of firearms and ammunition is prohibited, specifically applying these prohibitions to government entities. It adds subsections (d)(5) and (g)(5) of section 922 to the existing list, meaning government entities would be prohibited from providing firearms or ammunition to aliens who are unlawfully in the United States or who have been admitted under a nonimmigrant visa (with certain exceptions).
Proponents argue
Proponents argue this bill closes a perceived loophole that allows government entities to arm individuals who would otherwise be federally prohibited from possessing firearms, particularly illegal aliens. They assert it enhances national security and public safety by ensuring that only legally authorized individuals, not those unlawfully present, are entrusted with firearms, even in a governmental capacity.
Opponents contend
Opponents might argue that the bill could hinder legitimate law enforcement or national security operations that rely on certain non-citizens (e.g., foreign liaison officers, intelligence assets) to possess firearms under specific governmental authorizations. They might also contend that existing laws are sufficient or that this bill could create unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles or legal ambiguities for government agencies.
This bill is very short and can be read and understood quickly, making it accessible for evaluation.
Section 2
Expanding Firearm and Ammunition Prohibition to Government Entities for Certain Aliens
This section amends existing federal law (18 U.S.C. 925(a)(1)) to broaden the scope of who cannot possess firearms and ammunition. Specifically, it adds subsections (d)(5) and (g)(5) of section 922 to the list of prohibitions that apply to government entities. This means that government entities, such as law enforcement agencies, would be prohibited from providing firearms or ammunition to aliens who are unlawfully in the United States or who have been admitted under a nonimmigrant visa (with certain exceptions for hunting, sporting, or official purposes).
Supporters argue
Supporters argue this provision closes a critical loophole, preventing government agencies from inadvertently or intentionally arming individuals who are otherwise legally prohibited from possessing firearms due to their immigration status. They contend it enhances national security and ensures consistency in federal firearm laws.
Critics contend
Critics might argue that this provision could impede the operational flexibility of government agencies, particularly those involved in national security or international cooperation, by restricting their ability to equip certain non-citizens who perform legitimate, authorized duties requiring firearms. They might also raise concerns about potential impacts on intelligence gathering or liaison activities.
Tradeoffs
The bill balances the desire for stricter control over firearm possession by non-citizens with the potential need for government agencies to arm specific non-citizens for official duties, such as foreign law enforcement liaisons or intelligence assets. It aims to prevent unauthorized firearm access while navigating the complexities of international cooperation and national security operations.
The bill expands the existing exception in 18 U.S.C. 925(a)(1) to include subsections (d)(5) and (g)(5) of section 922. These subsections prohibit firearm possession by aliens who are unlawfully in the United States or who have been admitted under a nonimmigrant visa (with specific exceptions for hunting, sporting, or official purposes).
Section 2
Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to refer to existing law by citation rather than reprinting it, which is common for brevity and to avoid redundancy in the U.S. Code.
Case for: Supporters would argue that referencing existing code is efficient and avoids redundancy, assuming readers can access the referenced statutes for full context. This approach keeps the bill text concise.
Case against: Critics might contend that relying solely on citations makes the bill less accessible to the general public and non-legal professionals, requiring additional research to fully grasp its implications and the specific categories of aliens affected.
Estimated impact: Clarifies and expands the scope of firearm prohibitions for government entities regarding certain non-citizens, particularly those unlawfully present or on specific nonimmigrant visas, potentially affecting operational procedures for agencies that interact with such individuals.