The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 7715·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 25, 2026

Justice for Allie Act

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 25, 2026

Bottom line

This bill establishes new federal criminal penalties for the sexual exploitation of adults with certain cognitive or developmental vulnerabilities through coercive requests for intimate visual depictions.

What it actually does

This bill amends title 18, United States Code, to create a new federal offense prohibiting the knowing persuasion, inducement, enticement, or coercion of a "protected adult" to send or transmit an intimate visual depiction with the intent to cause harm. It defines "protected adult" as an individual 18 years or older who is unable to protect themselves due to specific developmental, intellectual, or neurocognitive disorders, and broadly defines "harm."

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill closes a critical gap in federal law, providing necessary legal tools to prosecute individuals who prey on vulnerable adults with specific disabilities or disorders. They contend it ensures justice for victims by specifically addressing the coercion of intimate visual depictions, recognizing that these adults may not be able to fully consent or understand the implications of such actions.

Opponents contend

Potential critics might raise concerns about the breadth and specificity of the "protected adult" definition, particularly how its reliance on evolving diagnostic criteria from external medical manuals (DSM and ICD) could lead to ambiguity or challenges in legal application. Some may also question the necessity of a new federal statute, arguing that existing state or federal laws might already cover aspects of coercion or exploitation, potentially leading to jurisdictional overlaps.

The bill is very short and clearly written, making it highly accessible for a quick read and understanding of its core provisions.

Section 2(a), adding new Section 2245A to Chapter 109A of title 18, United States Code.

Prohibiting Coercion of Protected Adults to Transmit Intimate Visual Depictions

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision establishes a new federal crime for anyone who knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces a "protected adult" to send an intimate visual depiction, using mail or interstate/foreign commerce, with the intent to cause harm. A first offense carries a penalty of up to 1 year imprisonment and/or a fine, while subsequent offenses can result in up to 2 years imprisonment and/or a fine.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIndividuals who exploit vulnerable adultsImpactFace federal criminal prosecution and penalties (up to 1 year for first offense, 2 years for subsequent)MechanismNew federal statute creating a specific offenseScaleApplies nationwide
GroupProtected adults (as defined in the bill)ImpactReceive enhanced legal protection against a specific form of sexual exploitationMechanismCreation of a specific federal offense targeting their exploitationScaleBenefits all individuals meeting the 'protected adult' definition

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly addresses a specific vulnerability, providing a legal recourse for victims who might otherwise fall through cracks in existing laws. It acknowledges that certain adults require additional protections due to cognitive or developmental impairments, ensuring their safety in the digital age.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that existing laws against coercion, exploitation, or harassment could already cover these acts, and adding a new federal statute might create redundancy or jurisdictional complexities without significantly enhancing protection. Concerns could also be raised about the potential for overreach or misapplication of federal law.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between ensuring comprehensive protection for vulnerable individuals and avoiding overly broad or redundant legislation that could complicate legal enforcement or lead to unintended consequences in the criminal justice system.

Section 2(b), adding new Section 2245A(b)(1) to Chapter 109A of title 18, United States Code.

Defining "Protected Adult" and "Harm"

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section defines a "protected adult" as an individual 18 years or older who is unable to protect themselves from abuse, neglect, or exploitation at the time of the offense, due to specific conditions such as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Developmental Disorder, Cerebral Palsy, Down Syndrome, Major Neurocognitive Disorder, Dementia/Alzheimer's disease, or Schizophrenia/another psychotic disorder. These conditions are defined by the most recent editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). "Harm" is broadly defined to include physical, psychological, financial, or reputational harm.

FOUND

The bill defines "intimate visual depiction" by referencing section 1309 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (15 U.S.C. 6851).

Section 2(a), new Section 2245A(a).

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to avoid redundancy and ensure consistency across federal law where a term is already defined. It streamlines the bill's text and maintains uniformity in legal terminology.

Case for: Referencing existing definitions streamlines legislation and maintains uniformity in legal terminology across different statutes, preventing conflicting interpretations of the same term in different laws.

Case against: Requires additional research for a full understanding of the bill's scope, potentially making the bill less accessible to the average reader who may not be familiar with the referenced statute.

Estimated impact: Ensures the new offense aligns with existing federal definitions for similar crimes, impacting how the law is interpreted and applied in practice, particularly by legal professionals and courts.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this