The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 7741·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 26, 2026

E-Access Act

IntroducedEnergyMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Mullin, Kevin [D-CA-15]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 26, 2026

Bottom line

The E-Access Act seeks to empower consumers with greater control over their energy data to foster innovation in energy management and improve electric grid reliability.

What it actually does

The bill, titled the "Access to Consumer Energy Information Act" or "E-Access Act," aims to promote competition in digital energy management by enhancing consumer access to their electric and natural gas usage data. It directs the Secretary of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to jointly develop guidelines for states on data sharing standards, requiring utilities to provide consumers and their third-party designees with electronic, machine-readable access to detailed energy information. It also authorizes $10 million for states to implement these programs and requires a report on the costs and benefits of using individual electric meter data for wholesale electricity market settlement.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that increased access to granular energy data will spur innovation in digital energy management tools, allowing consumers to better understand and control their energy consumption and costs. This transparency can lead to greater energy efficiency, demand response participation, and ultimately, a more reliable and resilient electric grid by enabling new products and services.

Opponents contend

Opponents might raise concerns about the potential for increased administrative burdens and compliance costs for electric and gas utilities to implement new data sharing standards and infrastructure. They may also highlight privacy and cybersecurity risks associated with broader data sharing, arguing that robust safeguards are essential but could be costly or difficult to fully guarantee.

The bill is moderately complex due to technical definitions and detailed regulatory guidelines, requiring a careful read to understand its full implications.

Sections 1 and 2

Establishes Short Title and Key Definitions

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section names the bill the "Access to Consumer Energy Information Act" or "E-Access Act." It also defines critical terms such as "electric consumer," "gas consumer," "retail electric energy information," and "retail natural gas information," which specify the types of data to be shared. It also defines "Green Button Connect My Data" as a key standard for data exchange and "grid edge computer" for local data analysis.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupElectric and Gas ConsumersImpactClarifies who is covered by the bill's provisions regarding data access.MechanismStatutory definitions.ScaleAll consumers nationwide.
GroupElectric and Gas UtilitiesImpactDefines the scope of data they must manage and potentially share.MechanismStatutory definitions.ScaleAll regulated utilities.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that clear definitions are essential for effective implementation and to ensure all stakeholders understand the scope of the bill's requirements and benefits.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against definitional sections, assuming the definitions are clear and not overly broad or narrow.

Tradeoffs

Balancing comprehensive definitions to cover all relevant technologies and data types with the need for clarity and avoiding overly prescriptive language that could stifle future innovation.

Section 3(a)

Expands State Energy Conservation Plan Eligibility

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This provision amends the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to allow states to use federal funds for programs that promote competition in digital energy management tools. These programs aim to enhance consumer access to and understanding of their energy usage and cost information, facilitate new energy management products, and increase the adoption of performance-based energy efficiency and demand response initiatives.

Section 3(b)

Establishes Federal Guidelines for Consumer Energy Data Access

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This core provision mandates the Secretary of Energy and FERC to jointly develop and issue guidelines within 180 days. These guidelines will establish model data sharing standards and policies for states, ensuring electric and gas consumers, and their authorized third parties, can access retail electric energy and natural gas information. The guidelines specify requirements for data format (electronic, machine-readable, open standards), timeliness (near real-time, 24 months historical), security, privacy (e.g., DataGuard program), and consumer consent for third-party access.

Section 3(c)

Provides Funding for State Implementation of Data Access Programs

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section authorizes the Secretary of Energy to certify state policies that comply with the federal data sharing guidelines. It also authorizes an appropriation of $10 million for fiscal year 2026 to assist certified states in implementing programs that promote digital energy management tools and enhance consumer access to energy information.

Section 3(d)

Mandates Report on Using Electric Meter Data for Wholesale Market Settlement

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This provision requires the Secretary of Energy and FERC to jointly submit a report to Congress within one year. The report must evaluate the costs and benefits of electric utilities transmitting individual electric consumer meter data to covered wholesale electricity markets for the purpose of settling market prices. It must include analysis of customer numbers, flexible demand, case studies, potential anticompetitive impacts, and cost estimates for reprogramming meters and settling markets.

FOUND

Defines "retail electric energy information" and "retail natural gas information" to include customer-specific details like name, address, contact info, payment history, and eligibility data for various programs (e.g., bill payment assistance, renewable energy, demand-side management).

Section 2(14)(F) and 2(15)(E)

Why it matters:Standard legislative practice to define terms comprehensively, but the breadth of "customer-specific information" might be overlooked by a casual reader.

Case for: Proponents would argue that this comprehensive data is essential for third-party providers to offer personalized, effective services, such as identifying eligibility for assistance programs or optimizing participation in demand response, thereby maximizing consumer benefits.

Case against: Critics might argue that including such sensitive personal and financial data broadens the scope of privacy concerns and increases the risk profile for utilities and third parties handling this information.

Estimated impact: Significantly expands the types of personal data that utilities must be prepared to share with consumer consent, enabling a wider range of third-party services but also increasing data privacy and security considerations.

FOUND

Establishes guidelines for electric meter software platforms, requiring fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms, transparency in uptime and evaluation procedures for new applications, developer access to documentation, due process rights, and addressing anti-competitive practices like self-preferencing. It also grants consumers, utilities, and gas utilities the right to select and operate applications on the meter.

Section 3(b)(4)(J)

Why it matters:While critical for competition, it's a technical detail within a broader set of guidelines, making it easy to overlook for those not focused on software ecosystems.

Case for: Proponents argue this is essential to prevent monopolies or unfair practices by meter manufacturers or utilities in the emerging "grid edge" computing space, ensuring a vibrant market for innovative applications that benefit consumers and the grid.

Case against: Critics might argue that such detailed regulation of software platforms could be overly prescriptive, stifle innovation by imposing rigid requirements, or create significant compliance burdens for utilities and meter vendors.

Estimated impact: Could significantly shape the competitive landscape for "grid edge" applications and services, potentially fostering innovation but also imposing new regulatory oversight on technology providers.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this