The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 7919·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 12, 2026

Gas Prices Relief Act of 2026

IntroducedTaxationMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Pappas, Chris [D-NH-1]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 12, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to provide temporary relief from high gasoline prices by eliminating federal fuel taxes, while using general treasury funds to backfill infrastructure and environmental trust funds, with a mandate for savings to reach consumers.

What it actually does

This bill temporarily suspends the federal excise tax on gasoline and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Trust Fund financing rate from its enactment date until October 1, 2026. It mandates that the Treasury transfer funds from the general fund to the Highway Trust Fund and the LUST Trust Fund to cover the lost revenue. Additionally, it establishes a policy that the tax reduction should be passed on to consumers, with the Secretary of the Treasury tasked with enforcement.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill offers immediate and tangible financial relief to consumers struggling with high gasoline prices, thereby boosting household disposable income and stimulating economic activity. They emphasize that the critical Highway Trust Fund and LUST Trust Fund are protected through general fund transfers, ensuring that vital infrastructure projects and environmental cleanup efforts are not jeopardized by the tax holiday.

Opponents contend

Opponents contend that the benefits of a gasoline tax holiday often do not fully reach consumers, with fuel companies potentially absorbing a significant portion of the savings as increased profits. They also argue that backfilling trust funds from the general treasury effectively shifts the cost to all taxpayers and contributes to the national debt, rather than providing a genuine tax cut, and could encourage increased fossil fuel consumption.

The bill text is exceptionally short and clear, allowing for a quick and comprehensive understanding of its provisions.

Section 2(a)

Temporary Suspension of Federal Gasoline and LUST Taxes

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision sets the federal excise tax rate on gasoline to zero and suspends the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Trust Fund financing rate for gasoline removed, entered, or sold from the date of enactment until October 1, 2026. This means that for approximately six and a half months, consumers would not pay the federal portion of the gasoline tax, which currently stands at 18.4 cents per gallon for gasoline and an additional 0.1 cents per gallon for the LUST fund.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupConsumers/MotoristsImpactPotential reduction in gasoline prices at the pump.MechanismDirect elimination of federal excise tax on gasoline.ScaleNationwide, affecting all purchasers of gasoline.
GroupGasoline producers and dealersImpactReduced tax burden on sales, potential for increased sales volume if prices drop.MechanismElimination of federal tax collection responsibility.ScaleIndustry-wide.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly lowers the cost of fuel for everyday Americans, providing immediate financial relief and potentially boosting economic activity by increasing household disposable income.

Critics contend

Critics contend that the benefit to consumers may be minimal if producers and retailers do not fully pass on the tax savings, instead absorbing the difference as increased profits, thereby undermining the bill's primary objective.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension is between providing immediate consumer relief and the risk that the savings may not fully reach consumers, alongside the fiscal implications of foregoing dedicated tax revenue.

Section 2(b)

General Fund Transfers to Highway and LUST Trust Funds

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directs the Secretary of the Treasury to transfer amounts from the general fund of the Treasury to the Highway Trust Fund and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund. These transfers are designed to replace the revenue that would otherwise be collected from the federal gasoline tax and the LUST financing rate during the tax holiday period, ensuring that these dedicated trust funds maintain their solvency and funding levels for infrastructure and environmental programs.

Section 2(c)

Policy on Passing Tax Reduction to Consumers and Enforcement

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section establishes a Congressional policy that consumers should immediately receive the full benefit of the tax reduction. It explicitly states that transportation motor fuels producers and dealers should reduce prices to reflect this reduction, and that those who fail to do so should face monetary penalties. The Secretary of the Treasury is mandated to use all applicable authorities to ensure that these benefits are indeed passed on to consumers.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this