The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 7986·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 18, 2026

Save the World Cup Act

IntroducedImmigrationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Pou, Nellie [D-NJ-9]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Mar 18, 2026

Bottom line

The bill creates temporary, geographically limited zones around 2026 FIFA World Cup venues where civil immigration enforcement is generally suspended, aiming to foster a welcoming environment for attendees while preserving critical emergency response capabilities.

What it actually does

This bill prohibits the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) from using federal funds for civil immigration enforcement activities within a one-mile radius of any 2026 FIFA World Cup match or Fan Festival. It includes specific exceptions for exigent circumstances, such as imminent risks to life, national security, or public safety, and the destruction of evidence in criminal cases.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill ensures that all attendees, including those who may have immigration concerns, can fully participate in and enjoy the 2026 FIFA World Cup without fear of civil immigration enforcement. They contend it promotes a welcoming environment for international visitors and local communities, boosting economic activity and cultural exchange associated with the event, and prevents potential public relations issues for the U.S. as a host nation.

Opponents contend

Opponents may argue that this bill creates a carve-out from existing immigration laws, potentially undermining enforcement efforts and creating a perception of selective application of the law. They might contend that it could inadvertently create temporary sanctuaries for individuals subject to civil immigration enforcement, and that immigration laws should be enforced consistently regardless of public events.

The bill is exceptionally short and clearly written, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its core provisions quickly.

Section 2(a)

Limitation on Civil Immigration Enforcement Near World Cup Venues

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section prohibits the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) from using federal funds for civil immigration enforcement activities within a one-mile radius of any 2026 FIFA World Cup match or Fan Festival. This restriction applies "notwithstanding any other provision of law," indicating its strong overriding authority.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIndividuals subject to civil immigration enforcementImpactTemporary protection from civil immigration enforcement in specific zones.MechanismFederal funds cannot be used for such activities.ScaleLimited to one-mile radius around World Cup venues during the event.
GroupAttendees of the 2026 FIFA World Cup and Fan FestivalsImpactIncreased sense of security and reduced fear of enforcement, potentially encouraging broader participation.MechanismCreation of "safe zones" for civil immigration enforcement.ScaleApplies to all attendees within the specified zones.
GroupDepartment of Homeland Security and Department of JusticeImpactRestricted operational capacity for civil immigration enforcement in specific areas.MechanismProhibition on fund usage for certain activities.ScaleLimited to the duration and locations of the World Cup events.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision fosters an inclusive and welcoming atmosphere for the World Cup, ensuring that all fans, regardless of immigration status, feel safe attending. This approach could maximize attendance, boost local economies, and project a positive international image for the United States as a host nation.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that this provision creates a temporary exemption from immigration law enforcement, potentially signaling a weakening of border security and interior enforcement. They may contend that it could be perceived as granting special privileges based on an event, rather than consistent application of law, and could be exploited by individuals seeking to avoid enforcement.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire to host a successful, inclusive international event with the ongoing mandate to enforce immigration laws. It creates a tension between the economic and cultural benefits of widespread participation in the World Cup and the principle of consistent legal enforcement.

Section 2(b)

Definition of Exigent Circumstances

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section defines the specific "exigent circumstances" under which the prohibition on civil immigration enforcement would not apply. These include situations involving imminent risks of death, violence, or physical harm (including terrorism), imminent threats to national security, immediate arrest or hot pursuit of individuals posing public safety risks, or the imminent risk of destruction of evidence material to an ongoing criminal case.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this