The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 809·119th Congress·Introduced Jan 28, 2025

Securing America’s Land from Foreign Interference Act

IntroducedInternational AffairsMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Roy, Chip [R-TX-21]
Committees
Foreign Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Jan 28, 2025

Bottom line

This bill seeks to prevent real estate ownership in the U.S. by individuals and entities linked to the Chinese Communist Party due to national security concerns.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the President to implement measures prohibiting members of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and entities under its ownership, control, or influence from purchasing any public or private real estate within the United States, including its territories and possessions. It aims to prevent foreign adversaries from acquiring strategic land assets.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue this bill is a vital national security measure to prevent adversarial foreign influence and control over critical U.S. land, including agricultural land and areas near military installations. They assert that the CCP poses a significant threat to U.S. interests and that restricting real estate ownership is a necessary step to safeguard national security and economic stability.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that such a broad prohibition could lead to discrimination, violate international trade agreements, or be difficult to implement without unintended consequences for legitimate foreign investment. They may also raise concerns about the practical challenges of identifying CCP members or entities 'under the ownership, control, or influence' of the CCP, potentially leading to overreach or arbitrary enforcement.

The bill is extremely short and straightforward, making it very accessible for readers to understand its core purpose quickly.

Section 2(a)

Prohibition on Real Estate Purchase by Chinese Communist Party Members and Affiliated Entities

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section mandates that the President must take all necessary actions to prevent members of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and any entities under the ownership, control, or influence of the CCP from purchasing any public or private real estate within the United States. This includes land in all states, territories, and possessions, aiming to safeguard national security and prevent adversarial foreign control over U.S. land assets.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupMembers of the Chinese Communist PartyImpactProhibited from purchasing real estate in the U.S.MechanismPresidential directive and enforcement actions.ScaleComplete prohibition.
GroupEntities under CCP ownership, control, or influenceImpactProhibited from purchasing real estate in the U.S.MechanismPresidential directive and enforcement actions.ScaleComplete prohibition.
GroupU.S. real estate marketImpactPotential reduction in certain foreign investment.MechanismExclusion of specific buyer categories.ScalePotentially significant in specific regions or sectors.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly addresses national security risks by preventing a hostile foreign power from acquiring strategic land, potentially near military bases or critical infrastructure, or agricultural land that could impact food security. They believe it closes a loophole that allows adversaries to gain influence through economic means.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this broad prohibition could be difficult to enforce without profiling or extensive surveillance, potentially leading to legal challenges based on discrimination or due process. They may also argue it could deter legitimate foreign investment from non-CCP affiliated Chinese individuals or entities, harming the U.S. economy.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances national security concerns against potential impacts on foreign investment, international relations, and the practical challenges of identifying and enforcing restrictions against individuals and entities based on their political affiliation or influence.

Section 2(b)

Broad Definition of United States

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section explicitly defines 'United States' to include not only the several States and the District of Columbia but also the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States. This ensures the prohibition applies nationwide across all U.S. sovereign land.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this