The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 8149·119th Congress·Introduced Mar 27, 2026

Agricultural Access to Addiction and Mental Health Care Act

IntroducedAgriculture and FoodSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2]
Committees
Agriculture Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 3, 2026

Bottom line

The bill requires a study to identify challenges and solutions for improving mental health and addiction care access for farmers and ranchers, authorizing $1 million annually for four fiscal years for this research.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct a comprehensive study on the accessibility of addiction and mental health care services for farmers and ranchers. The study will examine current availability, barriers to access, and identify best practices for improving care, particularly for those impacted by severe drought, extreme weather, market instability, and misinformation. It also requires recommendations for improvement, including the feasibility of funding six therapy sessions through an existing network.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that farmers and ranchers face unique and severe stressors that significantly impact their mental health and well-being, necessitating a thorough understanding of existing care gaps. This study is a crucial first step to developing effective, culturally competent support systems that can address these specific challenges and inform future policy decisions.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that while the issue of mental health in agricultural communities is vital, mandating another study could delay direct action or that sufficient information already exists to begin implementing solutions. Some might prefer immediate funding for direct services rather than allocating resources to a study, or question the scope of the study.

The bill is very short and uses clear language, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its provisions and implications quickly.

Section 3(a)

Mandate for a Study on Mental Health and Addiction Care Accessibility

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Director of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, to conduct a comprehensive study. The study will focus on how accessible addiction and mental health care providers and services are for farmers and ranchers, particularly those affected by severe drought, extreme weather events, unstable commodity markets, and consumer-targeted misinformation.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFarmers and RanchersImpactIndirect benefit through potential future policy improvements based on study findings regarding mental health and addiction care access.MechanismData collection and analysis leading to recommendations.ScaleNational, affecting all agricultural communities.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that a thorough study is essential to identify the specific challenges and existing gaps in mental health and addiction services for agricultural communities, which face unique stressors. This foundational research will inform effective policy solutions.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that while the issue is important, mandating another study could delay direct action or that sufficient information already exists to begin implementing solutions. They might prefer immediate funding for services rather than a study.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the need for comprehensive data to inform policy and the urgency of addressing mental health crises in agricultural communities, where a study might be perceived as a slower approach.

Section 3(b)

Specific Topics and Recommendations for the Study

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section details the specific areas the study must examine, including the availability of specialized care in rural areas, barriers to access (financial, geographic, cultural), and the identification of best practices from state and local programs. It also requires recommendations for improving accessibility, including exploring the feasibility of funding 6 reimbursable therapy sessions through the Farm and Ranch Stress Assistance Network.

Section 3(e)

Funding for the Study

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section authorizes the appropriation of $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2029 to carry out the study mandated by the Act. This provides the financial resources necessary for the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct the research and produce the required report.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this