A Stronger Workforce for America Act of 2026
- Sponsor
- Rep. Walberg, Tim [R-MI-5]
- Committees
- Education and Workforce Committee (primary)
- Last action
- Apr 21, 2026
Bottom line
The bill comprehensively overhauls federal workforce development programs, shifting administrative authority for adult education to the Department of Labor and emphasizing employer-driven, evidence-based training.
What it actually does
This bill reauthorizes and significantly amends the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), updating definitions, strengthening performance accountability, and introducing new grant programs. It also transfers the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act from the Department of Education to the Department of Labor and makes conforming amendments to other related workforce laws. The bill aims to enhance workforce development activities, improve job placement, and address skills gaps through evidence-based programs and employer partnerships.
Proponents argue
Supporters argue that the bill streamlines federal workforce programs, improves accountability through updated performance metrics, and better aligns training with employer needs by emphasizing employer-directed skills development and industry partnerships. They contend that moving adult education to the Department of Labor will create a more cohesive and efficient workforce system, preparing a globally competitive workforce and reducing dependency on public assistance.
Opponents contend
Critics may contend that transferring adult education programs to the Department of Labor could disrupt existing successful partnerships and diminish the educational focus of these programs. Concerns might also be raised about the increased emphasis on employer-directed training potentially narrowing the scope of available education and training options, or about the potential for administrative burdens on smaller employers or training providers due to new reporting requirements.
The bill is extensive and highly detailed, requiring substantial time for a thorough review. The estimated reading time is appropriate for an informed reader to grasp its full scope.
Sec. 101, Title I, Subtitle A
Updated Purposes of WIOA
This section amends the stated purposes of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. It explicitly adds 'economic mobility' and 'reduce dependency on public assistance programs' as goals, alongside preparing a globally competitive workforce for in-demand industry sectors and occupations, particularly for youth. It also updates terminology from 'support services' to 'supportive services'.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue these updated purposes better reflect modern economic realities and the need for a dynamic workforce that can adapt to changing industry demands, while also explicitly addressing social mobility and reducing reliance on public assistance.
Critics contend
No specific opposition is typically raised against general purpose statements, though some might argue that the new language could subtly shift priorities away from certain existing program beneficiaries.
Tradeoffs
The expansion of purposes to include 'economic mobility' and 'globally competitive workforce' might imply a broader mandate for programs, potentially stretching resources or requiring a re-evaluation of existing strategies.
Sec. 102, Title I, Subtitle A
Revised Definitions for WIOA
This section significantly revises key definitions within WIOA, including 'foundational skill needs' (now including digital literacy), 'employer-directed skills development' (with specific employer cost-sharing requirements), 'dislocated worker' (including those displaced by automation), and introduces new terms like 'co-enrollment', 'digital literacy skills', 'evidence-based', 'labor organization', 'regular high school diploma', 'work-based learning', and 'talent marketplace' (with components like credential registry and skills profile generator).
Sec. 115, Title I, Subtitle B
Local Workforce Development Area Redesignations
This section mandates a review and potential redesignation of local workforce development areas. States must review existing regions and local area designations, with a process for chief elected officials to approve or propose alternate redesignations. It sets specific timelines for initial and subsequent reviews (every 8 years) and allows for interim revisions under certain conditions, including incentives for local areas to consolidate.
Sec. 116, Title I, Subtitle B
Enhanced Performance Accountability System
This section significantly revises the WIOA performance accountability system. It updates primary indicators of performance for youth and adult programs, including new metrics for training participants in work-based learning and median earnings gain. It also modifies the process for setting performance levels, requiring the Secretary of Labor to propose expected levels and States to respond. Sanctions for failing to meet performance measures are revised, with specific reductions in state and local allocations and reallotment mechanisms. New reporting requirements include disaggregation by barriers to employment and median earnings gain for training participants.
Sec. 122, Title I, Subtitle C
Revised Eligibility for Training Service Providers
This section overhauls the process for identifying eligible providers of training services. It establishes general criteria (preparing for high-skill/high-wage/in-demand jobs, leading to recognized postsecondary credentials, offered for at least 1 year) and new performance criteria (credential attainment rate, job placement rate, median earnings, ratio of median earnings increase to program cost). It introduces 'employer-sponsored' and 'Workforce Innovation Leader (WIL)' designations with specific benefits and requirements. Eligibility revocation procedures are strengthened, and a publicly accessible 'talent marketplace' for program information is encouraged.
Sec. 132, Title I, Subtitle C
Youth Workforce Investment Activities Revisions
This section amends youth participant eligibility, including a 40-day provisional enrollment period and special rules for homeless and foster youth. It revises the out-of-school youth funding priority from 75% to 70% of funds, with a local area target of not less than 45%. It expands allowable statewide and local youth activities, emphasizing work-based learning, digital literacy, and coordination with apprenticeship programs. It also introduces individual training accounts for eligible youth and sets specific requirements for summer and year-round employment opportunities.
Sec. 131, 142, 143, Title I, Subtitle C
New State-Level Critical Industry Skills Fund and Industry/Sector Partnership Fund
The bill authorizes Governors to reserve up to 10% of WIOA youth, adult, and dislocated worker funds (matched by other state/federal funds) to establish two new state-level funds: a Critical Industry Skills Fund and an Industry or Sector Partnership and Career Pathways Development Fund. The Critical Industry Skills Fund provides performance-based payments to eligible entities for skills development in governor-identified critical industries, with employer cost-sharing. The Industry/Sector Partnership Fund awards grants to eligible partnerships to establish or expand industry partnerships and career pathway programs, with matching requirements and specific objectives for economic growth and worker training.
Sec. 141, Title I, Subtitle C
State Allotments for Adult and Dislocated Worker Activities
This section amends the State allotments for adult and dislocated worker employment and training activities. It updates cross-references to include new subsections related to dislocated worker projects and workforce data quality initiatives under section 169, ensuring these new activities are appropriately funded from the overall allotments.
Sec. 151-169, Title I, Subtitle D
Job Corps Program Reforms
This subtitle makes extensive changes to the Job Corps program, consistently replacing 'centers' with 'campuses'. It expands eligibility to individuals up to age 24 (from 21) and includes members of the Armed Forces eligible for preseparation counseling. It streamlines eligibility for homeless and foster youth. New requirements for campus operators include demonstrating past performance, offering career and technical education aligned with local employment, and implementing effective behavior management plans. Performance assessments are strengthened, with specific sanctions for underperforming campuses, including potential closure or transfer to state operation. It also authorizes increased funding for technical assistance.
Sec. 172, Title I, Subtitle E
Reentry Employment Opportunities Program
This section establishes a new Reentry Employment Opportunities Program within WIOA, funded by specific appropriations. It authorizes competitive grants and intermediary awards to eligible entities (including non-profits, local boards, and industry partnerships) to implement reentry projects for eligible adults (25+) and youth (14-24) involved with the justice system. Projects must provide individualized career services and training services, with a priority for high-poverty or rural areas and those serving individuals pre- or post-release. It includes a pay-for-performance component and requires rigorous evaluation of effectiveness and recidivism reduction.
Sec. 173, Title I, Subtitle E
Youth Apprenticeship Readiness Grant Program
This section establishes a new Youth Apprenticeship Readiness Grant Program, funded by a portion of H-1B visa fees. It authorizes competitive grants to eligible entities (joint labor-management organizations or partnerships including education/workforce entities and employers) to develop new or expand existing pre-apprenticeship and youth apprenticeship programs for individuals aged 16-24. Priority is given to areas with workforce shortages, those expanding opportunities for individuals with barriers to employment, and high-need educational agencies. It includes matching requirements and specific protections for youth in covered occupations.
Sec. 174, Title I, Subtitle E
Strengthening Community Colleges Workforce Development Grants Program
This section establishes a new competitive grant program for eligible institutions (community colleges, postsecondary vocational institutions, or consortia) to establish, improve, or expand high-quality workforce development programs. Grants are for up to 4 years, with renewal possible based on performance. Priority is given to institutions serving individuals with barriers to employment, incumbent workers needing foundational skills, and those using competency-based assessments. Funds must be used in partnership with employers in in-demand industries, focusing on evidence-based programs, career services, and transparent reporting of credentials and outcomes.
Sec. 190, Title I, Subtitle F
Make America Skilled Again Grants (Pilot Projects)
This section establishes the 'Make America Skilled Again Grants' program, authorizing up to 18 pilot projects (10 state-level, 8 local/consortium-level) over a 5-year period, with a possible 4-year renewal. These grants allow states, local areas, or consortia to receive consolidated WIOA funds and waive most statutory and regulatory requirements of Subtitles A and B, in exchange for pursuing innovative reforms and undergoing rigorous third-party evaluation. Participants must receive priority for services (veterans, low-income, dislocated workers, etc.), and projects must demonstrate improved employment and earnings outcomes.
Sec. 201-211, Title II, Subtitle A
Transfer of Adult Education Functions to Department of Labor
This subtitle transfers all functions of the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (AEFLA) from the Secretary of Education and the Department of Education to the Secretary of Labor and the Department of Labor. This includes personnel, assets, liabilities, contracts, and appropriations. The Office of Management and Budget is tasked with ensuring no net increase in full-time equivalent employees across federal agencies due to this transfer. The Secretary of Labor gains authority to delegate functions and reorganize entities within the Department to accommodate these new responsibilities.
Sec. 221-233, Title II, Subtitle B
Adult Education and Family Literacy Act Amendments
This subtitle amends the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (AEFLA) to align with its transfer to the Department of Labor and WIOA updates. It revises purposes to include digital literacy and AI literacy skills, and updates definitions. It subjects AEFLA programs to WIOA's performance accountability provisions, with a specific indicator for integrated education and training. It also enhances state leadership activities to include evidence-based instructional materials, professional development for adult educators (including apprenticeships), and coordination with CTE programs. Matching fund information must be publicly available, and correctional education programs are encouraged to coordinate with reentry projects.
Sec. 301, Title III
Amendments to the Wagner-Peyser Act
This section amends the Wagner-Peyser Act, which governs the public employment service. It expands the definition of 'State' to include the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa for allotment purposes. It clarifies that Employment Service offices co-located with one-stop delivery systems can provide basic career services as defined in WIOA. It also explicitly allows for the establishment of a 'talent marketplace' as an allowable use of funds and updates requirements for the workforce and labor market information system to be more real-time and digitally capable.
Sec. 302, Title III
H-1B Job Training Grants Revisions
This section significantly revises the H-1B Job Training Grants program under the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998. It permanently returns 12% of H-1B visa fees to the Treasury, allocates $65 million for the new Youth Apprenticeship Readiness Grant Program (Sec. 173), and then allots the remainder to states for individual training accounts for eligible dislocated workers. It sets specific allocation formulas for states and local areas, and establishes requirements for local areas regarding individual training account limits ($5,000 minimum) and the use of WIOA funds after H-1B funds are exhausted. It also defines 'eligible dislocated worker' for these funds.
Sec. 401, Title IV
Technical Assistance for Transforming to Competitive Integrated Employment
This section establishes a Center for Technical Assistance for Transforming to Competitive Integrated Employment within the Department of Labor (Office of Disability Employment Policy), in partnership with HHS and ED. The Center will provide technical assistance to employers transitioning from employing individuals with disabilities under special certificates to competitive integrated employment, and to state agencies supporting this transition. It aims to coordinate with existing technical assistance resources.
Sec. 501, Title V
Report on Data Capability and Interoperability of Federal and State Databases
This section replaces the existing WIOA section 505, requiring the Comptroller General (GAO) to prepare interim and final reports to Congress on federal and state databases and data exchange agreements related to job training information. The report must list existing systems, describe data elements (including those shared between states), study effects on WIOA implementation and individual privacy, explore opportunities to enhance data quality and interoperability, detail data breaches, survey security protocols, evaluate the State Wage Interchange System, assess feasibility of federal data exchange standards, and survey customer service/outcome management systems.
Introduces the definition of 'Talent Marketplace' as an array of publicly- and privately-owned platforms supported by interconnected, interoperable, open-standards technologies (including AI) used to match individuals with employment and learning opportunities. It specifies components like credential registries, learning and employment records, and skills profile generators, all using 'standardized terminology'.
Sec. 102(q), Title I, Subtitle A
Why it matters:This is likely standard legislative practice for defining new concepts that will underpin future policy implementation. The technical nature of the definition makes it appropriate for a definitions section, but its strategic importance is high.
Case for: Supporters argue that establishing a framework for a 'talent marketplace' is a forward-thinking step to modernize workforce development, leveraging technology and AI to create a more efficient, transparent, and skills-based labor market. Standardized terminology and interoperable data will empower individuals and employers.
Case against: Critics might raise concerns about the feasibility and cost of building such a comprehensive and interoperable system across all states and private entities. There could also be concerns about data privacy, algorithmic bias in matching, and ensuring equitable access for all individuals, particularly those with limited digital literacy.
Estimated impact: Potentially transformative impact on how jobseekers find opportunities and how employers find talent, shifting towards a more skills-based and data-driven system. The scale of implementation would be national.
Revises sanctions for State failure to meet performance accountability measures. If a State fails to meet 80% of an individual indicator score for a core program for any program year, the Secretary of Labor provides technical assistance. If this failure continues for a second consecutive year, or if a State fails to submit a report, 5% of the Governor's reserved funds are reduced and returned to the Secretary. For comprehensive failure (average 90% across all indicators for a single program or single indicator across all programs), technical assistance is provided, and if it continues for a second year, 8% of the Governor's reserved funds are reduced. Total reduction is capped at 10%. Reallotted funds go to high-performing states.
Sec. 116(f), Title I, Subtitle B
Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for detailing complex accountability mechanisms. The precise thresholds and consequences are necessarily technical.
Case for: Supporters argue that these revised sanctions provide a clear, escalating framework for accountability, incentivizing states to improve performance and ensuring that federal funds are used effectively. Reallotting funds to high-performing states rewards success and encourages best practices.
Case against: Critics might argue that even with statistical adjustments, these strict percentage-based sanctions could disproportionately penalize states serving more challenging populations or those facing unforeseen economic downturns. The reduction of funds could further hinder struggling states' ability to improve.
Estimated impact: Significant financial impact on underperforming states, potentially shifting millions of dollars in reserved funds to high-performing states. This could lead to substantial changes in state workforce program management.
Establishes a 'low-density workforce area' definition for states with a population density of less than 1.5 persons per square mile. For these areas, the priority for youth work experiences (Sec. 129(c)(4)) is reduced from 40% to 25% of allocated funds, and the sub-priority for apprenticeships/pre-apprenticeships within that is reduced from 12.5% to 7.5%.
Sec. 198(17), Title I, Subtitle F
Why it matters:This is likely a targeted policy adjustment for specific geographic conditions, which is often placed in general provisions or special rules. Its impact is specific to a subset of states.
Case for: Supporters argue that states with low population density face unique challenges in providing work experiences and apprenticeships, such as fewer employers or longer travel distances. This flexibility allows them to adapt program design to their specific geographic and economic realities.
Case against: Critics might argue that reducing the priority for work experiences and apprenticeships, even in low-density areas, could diminish the focus on these critical components of youth workforce development. It could also create an uneven playing field for youth in different states.
Estimated impact: Modest impact on the allocation of youth funds in a small number of states, allowing for greater flexibility in program design in rural contexts.