The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
4 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with REPORTED IN HOUSE (Jun 24, 2026)

Technical and procedural updates only. The changes reflect the bill's progression from being reported in the House (v2) to being referred to the Senate (v4), including updated legislative status and clerk attestations. The operative text of the bill remains identical in both versions, with no substantive policy changes.

Skipping v3 (ENGROSSED IN HOUSE). Those versions changed too little to need their own analysis, so they reuse REPORTED IN HOUSE's. Changes are measured from the most recent version analyzed on its own.

H.R. 8278·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 14, 2026

Fostering the Use of Technology to Uphold Regulatory Effectiveness in Supervision Act

Passed HouseFinance and Financial SectorSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Stutzman, Marlin A. [R-IN-3]
Committees
Financial Services Committee (primary)
Last action
Sep 16, 2026

This analysis was written for v2 (REPORTED IN HOUSE, Jun 24, 2026). REFERRED IN SENATE changed too little to need its own, so it reuses that one rather than a rewrite. The differences between the two are summarized above. View v2

Bottom line

H.R. 8278 aims to modernize the technological infrastructure and practices of key financial regulatory agencies to enhance their ability to supervise financial institutions effectively in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.

What it actually does

This bill mandates that several federal financial supervisory agencies, including the Federal Reserve, FDIC, OCC, FinCEN, FHFA, and NCUA, conduct assessments of their existing technological capabilities and procurement practices. The primary goal is to identify challenges in conducting adequate, real-time supervisory assessments and to find opportunities to streamline technology acquisition. Following these initial assessments, the agencies are required to coordinate and jointly submit a comprehensive report to Congress every five years, detailing their technology infrastructure, workforce, data practices, market trends, and plans for future technological upgrades.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that the bill is essential for ensuring that financial regulators can keep pace with the rapid technological advancements in the financial sector, including the expansion of artificial intelligence. They contend that modernizing supervisory technology will enable more effective monitoring of risks, improve consumer protection, enhance Bank Secrecy Act compliance, and prevent vulnerabilities arising from outdated systems, ultimately preserving a safe and sound banking system.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that mandating specific assessment and reporting cycles could be overly prescriptive, potentially diverting resources from immediate supervisory tasks or creating bureaucratic burdens without guaranteeing effective technological upgrades. Some might also raise concerns about the security implications of sharing detailed technological capabilities with Congress, even with safeguards, or the potential for increased costs to supervised entities for data sharing.

The bill is concise and clearly structured, making it accessible for an informed reader to understand its core requirements within a short timeframe.

Section 3(a)(1)

Mandate for Technological Capabilities Assessment

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires each covered agency to assess, within 180 days of the bill's enactment, how their current technologies hinder their ability to conduct adequate, real-time supervision of regulated entities. This includes evaluating core information technology infrastructure, technologies used directly for supervision, tools for monitoring general market risks using reported and external data, and technologies for data collection, storage, processing, and security.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCovered Agencies (Federal Reserve, FDIC, OCC, FinCEN, FHFA, NCUA)ImpactRequired to conduct internal reviews and identify technological shortcomings.MechanismDirect legislative mandate.ScaleInternal operational impact across multiple federal financial regulators.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this assessment is a crucial first step to identify and address the technological gaps that prevent regulators from effectively overseeing a complex and rapidly evolving financial system, especially with the rise of new technologies like AI.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the concept of agencies assessing their own capabilities, though some might argue about the scope or timeline if it were deemed overly burdensome.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the immediate resource allocation for conducting the assessment and the long-term benefits of improved supervisory effectiveness.

Section 3(a)(2)

Assessment of Technology Procurement Practices

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires each covered agency, also within 180 days of enactment, to assess their procurement rules and protocols for acquiring or developing new technological systems. They must identify any opportunities to streamline these processes, particularly concerning the ability of the covered agency to test new technological systems, within their existing authority.

Section 3(b)

Joint Report to Congress on Technological Capabilities and Plans

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision mandates that, 18 months after completing the initial assessments and every 5 years thereafter, the covered agencies must coordinate and jointly submit a report to specific Congressional committees. The report must detail their hardware/software, procurement practices, technology workforce, data collection processes, market trends, and plans for future technology upgrades, including timelines, costs, and potential interagency coordination. The report must be submitted in a manner that does not compromise security.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this