The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 8315·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 15, 2026

Modal Parity in Permitting Act

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 15, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to accelerate transportation infrastructure projects by streamlining land acquisition processes for transit and passenger rail, potentially reducing project delays and costs while maintaining environmental review safeguards.

What it actually does

This bill, the "Modal Parity in Permitting Act," clarifies and expands the types of real property interests that can be acquired with federal transit assistance. It also allows for the early acquisition of real property for passenger rail projects before environmental reviews are completed, with a crucial safeguard that prohibits physical development until all required environmental reviews are finalized.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the bill will significantly expedite critical transit and passenger rail projects by allowing agencies to secure necessary land earlier in the planning process. This approach is expected to reduce costs associated with property value appreciation and avoid delays caused by protracted land acquisition, thereby ensuring federal funds are used more efficiently for infrastructure development.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that while the bill aims for efficiency, allowing property acquisition before environmental reviews could lead to premature commitments to projects. This could result in wasted resources or increased public opposition if land is acquired for projects that are later deemed environmentally unsound or require significant modifications, potentially undermining the spirit of environmental protection laws.

The bill is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly and evaluate its implications.

Section 2(a)

Expanded Scope for Transit Real Property Acquisition

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends existing law (49 U.S.C. 5323(q)) to broaden the definition of land that can be acquired using federal transit assistance. Previously, the law specifically referred to "right-of-way" for corridor preservation. This amendment changes that to "real property interests," making it clear that a wider range of land types and purposes related to transit projects can be federally supported. It also explicitly states that the assistance can be used for "acquired" real property interests.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal Transit Administration (FTA) and its grant recipients (state/local transit agencies)ImpactIncreased flexibility in using federal funds for land acquisition, potentially streamlining project development.MechanismStatutory amendment to 49 U.S.C. 5323(q).ScaleBroad impact on all federal transit projects involving land acquisition.
GroupProperty ownersImpactPotential for earlier engagement regarding property acquisition for transit projects.MechanismChanges to federal funding eligibility and project timelines.ScaleLocalized impact depending on project location.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this clarification removes ambiguity and allows transit agencies to more effectively plan and execute projects by enabling them to acquire all necessary real property interests, not just traditional rights-of-way, with federal assistance. This reduces legal hurdles and streamlines project development.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against this provision as it primarily clarifies existing intent and broadens flexibility without introducing new mandates or significant controversy. Any opposition would likely be part of broader concerns about federal spending or eminent domain.

Tradeoffs

The tradeoff is between precise statutory language and operational flexibility. While "right-of-way" is specific, "real property interests" offers broader utility but requires clear guidance from the FTA to prevent misuse.

Section 3

Pre-Environmental Review Real Property Acquisition for Passenger Rail

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section adds a new provision (49 U.S.C. 24203) allowing recipients of federal financial assistance for passenger rail projects (under chapters 229, 249, or 243) to acquire, lease, or otherwise secure real property interests before or during the completion of environmental reviews. Crucially, it explicitly states that no physical development or improvement can occur on these acquired properties until all required environmental reviews for the project are fully completed.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this