The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 8368·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 20, 2026

To appropriate funds for the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Disaster Relief Fund, and for other purposes.

IntroducedEmergency ManagementMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Carter, Troy A. [D-LA-2]
Committees
Appropriations Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 20, 2026

Bottom line

This bill provides a significant emergency appropriation to ensure the Federal Emergency Management Agency has sufficient funds to respond to and recover from major disasters in fiscal year 2026.

What it actually does

This bill appropriates $26,367,000,000 to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Disaster Relief Fund for fiscal year 2026. These funds are designated to remain available until expended and are intended to cover necessary expenses for carrying out the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, specifically for major disasters. The bill also formally designates these appropriated amounts as an emergency requirement, exempting them from certain budget enforcement rules.

Proponents argue

Proponents would argue that this appropriation is crucial for ensuring FEMA can effectively respond to natural disasters, protect lives, and support communities in recovery. They would emphasize the unpredictable nature of disasters and the need for a robust, well-funded Disaster Relief Fund to provide timely aid and prevent delays in critical assistance, especially given the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events.

Opponents contend

Opponents might raise concerns about the emergency designation bypassing regular budget processes, potentially contributing to the national debt without offsetting cuts. While direct opposition to disaster relief funding itself is rare, critics might question the specific amount or argue for more stringent oversight of FEMA's spending to ensure fiscal responsibility.

The bill text is extremely short and can be read in under a minute, making it highly accessible for public review.

Section 1(a)

Appropriation for Disaster Relief Fund

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section appropriates $26,367,000,000 from the U.S. Treasury for the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Disaster Relief Fund for fiscal year 2026. These funds are designated to cover necessary expenses for carrying out the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, specifically for major disasters declared under that Act. The funds will remain available until expended, meaning they do not expire at the end of the fiscal year and can be used for ongoing recovery efforts.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupCommunities and individuals affected by major disastersImpactDirect financial assistance for recovery, infrastructure repair, and emergency response.MechanismFEMA grants and programs under the Stafford Act.ScaleBillions of dollars in aid, potentially impacting millions of people across multiple states.
GroupState and local governmentsImpactReimbursement for disaster-related expenses, support for emergency services and infrastructure rebuilding.MechanismFederal cost-sharing for disaster response and recovery projects.ScaleSignificant financial relief, enabling faster and more comprehensive recovery efforts.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this appropriation is vital for ensuring FEMA has the necessary resources to respond promptly and effectively to unforeseen natural disasters, protecting lives and property, and facilitating rapid recovery for affected communities. They emphasize that adequate funding prevents delays in aid and ensures federal readiness.

Critics contend

While direct opposition to disaster relief is uncommon, critics might argue that the emergency designation allows for spending outside normal budget caps, contributing to the national debt. They may also call for greater accountability in how FEMA funds are spent or suggest alternative funding mechanisms.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension involves balancing the immediate, critical need for disaster relief funding with broader fiscal responsibility and adherence to budget constraints. Using emergency designations ensures rapid deployment of funds but can be seen as undermining regular budget processes.

Section 1(b)

Emergency Designation

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This subsection formally designates the appropriated funds as an "emergency requirement." This designation is made pursuant to section 4(g) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, which exempts emergency spending from certain budget enforcement rules. It also designates the funds as an emergency requirement under the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2022 and legislation establishing fiscal year 2026 budget enforcement in the House of Representatives, allowing the spending to be outside of standard budget caps.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this