The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
3 versions
CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with ENGROSSED IN HOUSE (Jun 8, 2026)

Technical corrections only. The changes between v2 and v3 reflect the bill's procedural movement from the House to the Senate and the addition of the Clerk's name in the attestation. No substantive policy changes were made to the bill's text.

H.R. 8428·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 22, 2026

Federal Fraud Prevention Workforce Training Act

Passed HouseGovernment Operations and PoliticsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Grothman, Glenn [R-WI-6]
Committees
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 9, 2026

Bottom line

H.R. 8428 mandates new antifraud training for federal employees and offers it to state and local partners to reduce improper payments and fraud in federal programs.

What it actually does

This bill establishes a mandatory, government-wide training program for federal employees involved in administering federal programs or financial assistance, focusing on antifraud and improper payment prevention. It also allows the Secretary of the Treasury to make this training available at no cost to state, local, and tribal governments that administer federally funded programs, along with technical assistance.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill is a crucial step towards safeguarding taxpayer dollars by equipping federal, state, and local administrators with the necessary skills and knowledge to identify, prevent, and report fraud and improper payments. They contend that a standardized, comprehensive training program will lead to significant long-term savings and increased efficiency in government spending.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that while the goal of reducing fraud is laudable, mandating a new, government-wide training program could impose significant administrative burdens and costs on agencies, potentially diverting resources from core program functions. They might also question the effectiveness of a one-size-fits-all training approach for diverse federal programs and the potential for redundant training efforts.

The bill is short and clearly written, making it accessible for a quick read and easy to understand its core provisions.

Section 2(a), adding 5 U.S.C. 4122(a)

Establishment of Federal Antifraud and Improper Payment Prevention Training Program

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision directs the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), in consultation with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), to establish and maintain a government-wide training program. This program is designed to prevent fraud and improper payments across all federal agencies and programs.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal agenciesImpactRequires participation in and implementation of a new training program.MechanismMandate to establish and maintain the program.ScaleGovernment-wide
GroupSecretary of the Treasury, Director of OMB, Director of OPMImpactIncreased responsibility for program development and oversight.MechanismDirects these officials to establish and maintain the program.ScaleHigh

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that centralizing the development of antifraud training ensures consistency and leverages expertise across the government, leading to a more robust and effective prevention strategy.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against the establishment of a program aimed at reducing fraud, though concerns about its implementation and cost-effectiveness may arise.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the desire for a standardized, high-quality training program and the potential for administrative overhead in its creation and maintenance.

Section 2(a), adding 5 U.S.C. 4122(b)

Curriculum Requirements for the Training Program

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section outlines the specific topics that the antifraud training program must cover. These include identifying fraud risks, using various government resources and tools like the GAO's Framework for Managing Fraud Risks, OMB Circular A-123, the Treasury's Anti-Fraud Playbook, NIST Digital Identity Guidelines, data analytics, the Do Not Pay system, and establishing internal controls.

Section 2(a), adding 5 U.S.C. 4122(c)

Mandatory Participation for Federal Employees

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that certain federal employees, including program administrators, financial managers, disbursement certifying officials, auditing officials, and grants managers, must complete the antifraud training. They must complete it within 180 days of appointment or the effective date of the Act, and then at least once every two years thereafter. OPM is tasked with certifying completion and maintaining records.

Section 2(a), adding 5 U.S.C. 4122(d)

Availability to State, Local, and Tribal Governments

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to make the antifraud training program available at no cost to employees or contractors of state, local, or federally recognized Indian Tribal governments who are responsible for administering federally funded programs. The Secretary may also provide technical assistance to help these entities integrate the program's standards into their own administrative frameworks.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this