The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 8471·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 23, 2026

PRIMATE Act

IntroducedForeign Trade and International FinanceSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Steube, W. Gregory [R-FL-17]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 23, 2026

Bottom line

The PRIMATE Act broadly bans the importation of nonhuman primates into the U.S., with a specific exemption for AZA-accredited zoos not using them for research.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Tariff Act of 1930 to establish a general prohibition on the importation of live nonhuman primates into the United States. It includes a narrow exception for importation by, and for placement with, facilities accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA), provided these primates will not be used for experiments, testing, or breeding for such purposes. The bill also grants U.S. Customs and Border Protection the authority to deny clearance for prohibited shipments and establishes civil penalties of up to $50,000 per violation, along with forfeiture of illegally imported primates.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that prohibiting the importation of nonhuman primates is a crucial step to prevent the spread of zoonotic diseases, protecting public health from 'toxic exposures' that can arise from contact with these animals. They contend that such a ban reduces risks associated with the wildlife trade and ensures better animal welfare standards by limiting commercial exploitation.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that a broad prohibition on nonhuman primate importation could severely hinder critical biomedical research, particularly in areas requiring primate models for studying diseases, developing vaccines, and testing new therapies. They may also contend that the existing regulatory framework is sufficient to manage health risks and that a blanket ban is an overreach that could stifle scientific advancement.

The bill is very short and clearly written, making it highly accessible for a reader to evaluate its core provisions quickly.

Section 2, adding Section 308A(b) to the Tariff Act of 1930

General Prohibition on Nonhuman Primate Importation

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision makes it illegal for any person or entity to bring any live nonhuman primate into the United States. This establishes a broad ban on the commercial or private importation of monkeys, apes, and other primates, aiming to significantly restrict their entry into the country.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupImporters and wildlife tradersImpactProhibition on business activitiesMechanismDirect legal ban on importationScaleHigh
GroupIndividuals or entities seeking to acquire nonhuman primatesImpactRestricted accessMechanismElimination of legal import channelsScaleHigh

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that this general prohibition is essential for safeguarding public health by reducing the risk of zoonotic disease transmission and for enhancing animal welfare by curbing the often-inhumane conditions associated with the international primate trade.

Critics contend

Opponents would contend that a blanket ban is overly broad and could negatively impact legitimate activities, such as certain types of scientific research or conservation efforts that might require specific primate species not available domestically.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances public health and animal welfare concerns against potential impacts on scientific research and the freedom of individuals or institutions to import specific animals for various purposes.

Section 2, adding Section 308A(c) to the Tariff Act of 1930

Exception for AZA-Accredited Facilities (Non-Research Use)

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section creates a specific exemption to the general import ban. Nonhuman primates can still be imported if they are destined for an AZA-accredited facility (like a zoo) and if the importer certifies that the primate will not be used for experiments, testing, or breeding for such purposes. This ensures that accredited zoos can continue their conservation, education, and exhibition roles.

Section 2, adding Section 308A(d) and (e) to the Tariff Act of 1930

Enforcement and Penalties

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This part of the bill assigns responsibility for enforcing the import ban to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), requiring them to deny entry to any prohibited nonhuman primate shipments. It also establishes significant penalties for violations, including civil fines of up to $50,000 per violation and the forfeiture of any nonhuman primate imported unlawfully. These measures are designed to deter illegal importation effectively.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this