The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecords

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
4 versions
Back to REPORTED IN HOUSE
Comparev1INTRODUCED IN HOUSEApr 23→v2REPORTED IN HOUSEJul 6
SubstantiveINTRODUCED IN HOUSE → REPORTED IN HOUSE

What changed between these versions

A substantive revision, v2 modifies the conditions for issuing and terminating natural lifetime injunctions. It now requires victim consent for government-initiated motions and expands the grounds for victims to seek termination. The definition of "covered offense" was clarified to specify federal felonies and adjusted the list of included offenses, removing four sections and adding one.

Overview

A moderate number of changes affecting key operative provisions. · v2 refines the conditions for issuing and terminating injunctions, clarifies definitions, and adjusts the scope of covered offenses, generally enhancing victim agency.

The most significant change is the requirement for victim consent when the Government moves for a lifetime injunction, granting victims more control over the process. Additionally, victims can now seek termination of an injunction due to a "change in circumstances," providing greater flexibility. The definition of "covered offense" was clarified to explicitly refer to federal felonies and modified by removing four specific offenses while adding one, altering the scope of applicable crimes.

+

Major additions

+
Section 3773(b)(1)(A)(ii) of title 18, United States Code (new ground for termination)

This new provision allows a victim to move for the termination or suspension of a natural lifetime injunction based on an "allegation of a change in circumstances." This provides a broader and more flexible ground for victims to seek an end to the no-contact order.

This significantly expands the victim's agency regarding the injunction, providing a flexible mechanism for termination beyond just a pardon or commutation of the conviction. It introduces a new pathway for victims to potentially end the no-contact order if their situation or wishes change, reflecting a greater emphasis on victim autonomy.

−

Deletions

−
Section 3773(d)(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code (list of covered offenses)

The specific offenses under sections 2254 (Recordkeeping requirements), 2255 (Forfeiture of property in connection with sexual exploitation of children), 2426 (Use of interstate commerce for prohibited sexual acts), and 2427 (Transportation for illegal sexual activity and related crimes) were removed from the list of "covered offenses."

The removal of these four sections narrows the scope of offenses for which a natural lifetime injunction can be issued. This means defendants convicted under these specific statutes would no longer be subject to these injunctions, potentially reducing the number of cases where such orders apply and altering the range of crimes covered by the bill.

~

Modifications

~
Section 3773(a) of title 18, United States Code
Narrows the conditions under which the Government can initiate a motion for a lifetime injunction by adding a victim consent requirement.

This change grants victims greater control over the initiation of a lifetime injunction when the Government is the moving party. It ensures that the Government cannot seek such an order without the victim's explicit agreement, empowering victims in the process and making their wishes central to the injunction's imposition.

Before

Allowed the court to issue an injunction on motion of the Government or a victim.

After

Requires the Government's motion for an injunction to be "with the consent of a victim."

~
Section 3773(a) of title 18, United States Code
Clarifies the procedural requirement for the injunction order, adding a mandate for service on the defendant.

This ensures that defendants are formally notified of the lifetime injunction during sentencing, enhancing due process and clarity regarding the order's existence and terms. It reduces ambiguity about whether the defendant is aware of the injunction.

Before

Stated the order "shall be included in any sentencing proceeding."

After

Specifies the order "shall be included in and served on the defendant during any sentencing proceeding."

~
Section 3773(d)(1)(A) of title 18, United States Code
Clarifies the definition of "covered offense" by explicitly referencing the definition of "crime of violence" in section 16(a) and specifying that the felony must be "under Federal law."

This modification provides a more precise legal framework for determining what constitutes a "covered offense," ensuring consistency with existing federal statutes and potentially narrowing or clarifying the application of the law to only federal felonies and specific definitions. This reduces potential ambiguity in interpretation.

Before

Defined "covered offense" to include "a crime of violence that is a felony" and "a felony offense that includes as an element a sexual act or sexual conduct."

After

Clarifies "crime of violence (as such term is defined in section 16(a)) that is a felony under Federal law" and "an offense that includes as an element a sexual act or sexual conduct (as defined in section 2246) that is a felony under Federal law."

~
Section 3773(d)(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code (list of covered offenses)
Expands the list of specific offenses for which a lifetime injunction can be issued.

This addition means that defendants convicted of interstate stalking (section 2261A) will now be subject to the natural lifetime injunctions, expanding the protection offered to victims of this specific crime and increasing the scope of the bill's application.

Before

Did not include section 2261A in the list of covered offenses.

After

Adds section 2261A (Interstate stalking) to the list of "covered offenses."

Scope

Meaningful expansion or narrowing — Changes are concentrated within the core operative section (Section 2, amending title 18) of the bill, specifically within the new Section 3773. — v2 represents a refinement of the policy direction, enhancing victim agency in the process and clarifying the scope of covered offenses, rather than a fundamental shift in the bill's overall purpose. — The changes primarily affect the newly proposed Section 3773, with the definition clarifications interacting with existing federal law definitions, particularly Section 16(a) for 'crime of violence'.

Impact analysis

Victims of covered offenses

Gains (increased agency and options).

Victims now have the explicit right to consent to a government-initiated motion for a lifetime injunction and can move to terminate an injunction based on a "change in circumstances."

Defendants convicted of covered offenses

Procedural clarity; for those convicted of removed offenses, a gain (no injunction); for those convicted of added offenses, a loss (now subject to injunction).

The process for issuing and terminating injunctions is more clearly defined, including explicit service of the order. The scope of "covered offenses" is slightly altered, with some offenses removed and one added.

Defendants convicted under sections 2254, 2255, 2426, or 2427 of title 18

Gains (exemption from injunction).

These specific offenses are no longer included in the list of "covered offenses" for which a natural lifetime injunction can be issued.

Defendants convicted under section 2261A (Interstate stalking) of title 18

Losses (now subject to injunction).

This offense is newly added to the list of "covered offenses" for which a natural lifetime injunction can be issued.

Federal courts and prosecutors

Procedural changes (increased administrative burden for consent, clearer guidelines for application).

The process for initiating and terminating injunctions now includes additional requirements (victim consent for government motions, consideration of "change in circumstances" for victim motions). The definition of "covered offense" is clarified.