To amend the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act to require each institution of higher education to certify as part of an application for a research and development award that such institution does not operate certain branch campuses, and for other purposes.
- Sponsor
- Rep. Stefanik, Elise M. [R-NY-21]
- Committees
- Science, Space, and Technology Committee (primary)
- Last action
- Apr 28, 2026
Bottom line
The bill restricts federal research funding for higher education institutions that operate branch campuses in designated foreign countries, aiming to safeguard U.S. research and intellectual property from adversarial nations.
What it actually does
This bill amends the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act to require federal research agencies to mandate that institutions of higher education applying for research and development awards certify they do not operate branch campuses in a specified list of countries, including China, Russia, Iran, and others. The Secretary of State is also granted authority to add additional countries to this restricted list. The aim is to enhance research security by limiting federal funding to institutions with certain foreign ties.
Proponents argue
Proponents argue that this bill is a critical step in protecting U.S. national security and intellectual property from foreign adversaries. By preventing federal research funds from flowing to institutions with operations in countries like China and Russia, it reduces the risk of technology transfer, espionage, and undue foreign influence on American research. They emphasize the importance of maintaining a competitive edge in science and technology by securing the research ecosystem from potential exploitation.
Opponents contend
Opponents might argue that such a broad restriction could inadvertently harm academic freedom, international collaboration, and the global reach of American higher education. They may contend that it could lead to a 'brain drain' or limit opportunities for U.S. researchers to engage with international talent and perspectives, potentially hindering scientific progress. Concerns could also be raised about the potential for overreach, the administrative burden on institutions, or the arbitrary nature of the country list.
The bill is very concise and its core provisions are straightforward, allowing for a quick and clear understanding.
Section 1(a), inserting new section 10634A into 42 U.S.C. 19231 et seq.
Research Security Requirement for Institutions of Higher Education
This provision mandates that federal agencies providing research and development awards must require applicant institutions of higher education to certify that they do not operate branch campuses in specific countries. These countries include the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Cuba, the Republic of Turkey, the Russian Federation, and the State of Qatar. The Secretary of State is also authorized to add any other country deemed appropriate. A 'branch campus' is defined as a permanent, geographically separate unit offering degrees, with its own faculty, administration, and budgetary authority.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue this provision directly addresses national security concerns by preventing federal research dollars from indirectly supporting or being compromised by entities operating in adversarial nations. It ensures that U.S. taxpayer-funded research remains secure and its benefits accrue to the U.S. without risk of intellectual property theft or foreign influence.
Critics contend
Critics might argue that this provision could force U.S. institutions to abandon valuable international partnerships and educational opportunities, potentially isolating American academia. They may also contend that the definition of a 'branch campus' is broad and could impact legitimate educational endeavors, while the list of countries could be seen as politically motivated rather than purely security-driven.
Tradeoffs
The bill balances national security interests and the protection of intellectual property against the potential for reduced international academic engagement and collaboration. It also weighs the administrative burden on institutions and federal agencies against the perceived benefits of enhanced research security.