ATIIP Reauthorization and Improvement Act
- Sponsor
- Rep. Pappas, Chris [D-NH-1]
- Committees
- Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
- Last action
- Apr 29, 2026
Bottom line
This bill extends federal funding for active transportation projects, supporting the development of infrastructure for walking and cycling across the nation.
What it actually does
This bill reauthorizes the Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment Program (ATIIP) for an additional five fiscal years, from 2027 through 2031. It authorizes an annual appropriation of $250,000,000 from the Highway Trust Fund to support projects that enhance active transportation infrastructure, such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
Proponents argue
Supporters argue that this reauthorization provides essential and consistent federal funding for projects that improve public health, reduce traffic congestion, lower carbon emissions, and enhance community connectivity and safety for pedestrians and cyclists. They emphasize the long-term benefits of encouraging active modes of transportation.
Opponents contend
Critics might contend that while active transportation is valuable, federal funding for such programs could divert resources from other critical infrastructure needs, or that these types of projects should primarily be funded at the state or local level. Some fiscal conservatives may also raise concerns about the overall level of federal spending.
The bill is exceptionally short and clearly written, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.
Section 2
Reauthorization and Funding for Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment Program
This section amends the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to extend the Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment Program (ATIIP) for fiscal years 2027 through 2031. It authorizes an annual appropriation of $250,000,000 from the Highway Trust Fund (excluding the Mass Transit Account) for each of these five years. The funds are designated as contract authority, meaning they are available for obligation until expended and cannot be transferred to other programs.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that consistent federal investment in active transportation infrastructure is crucial for promoting public health, reducing carbon emissions, easing traffic congestion, and creating safer, more accessible communities for all modes of travel. They emphasize that dedicated funding allows for long-term planning and execution of vital projects.
Critics contend
Some critics may argue that while active transportation is valuable, funding for such projects should primarily come from state or local sources, or that federal funds could be better directed to other pressing infrastructure needs, potentially questioning the scale of federal involvement in these specific types of projects.
Tradeoffs
The bill balances the desire for federal support for active transportation against potential concerns about the scope of federal spending and the allocation of Highway Trust Fund resources, which are traditionally associated with motor vehicle infrastructure. It also ensures dedicated funding but limits flexibility in its use.