The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 8613·119th Congress·Introduced Apr 30, 2026

To providing access to certain memorials on Federal property during Government shutdown, and for other purposes.

IntroducedGovernment Operations and PoliticsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Goodlander, Maggie [D-NH-2]
Committees
Oversight and Government Reform Committee (primary)
Last action
Apr 30, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to ensure public access to specific non-federally funded memorials during government shutdowns by classifying related federal employees as essential personnel.

What it actually does

This bill mandates that during a lapse in appropriations (government shutdown), federal agencies must provide public access to memorials that are not federally funded but are typically accessible through federal property. It also designates federal employees whose duties relate to providing this access as 'excepted' from furlough, ensuring they continue working and are paid during a shutdown.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill ensures that important sites of commemoration, often maintained by private funds, remain open to the public even when federal operations are disrupted. They contend it respects veterans and other groups honored by these memorials, preventing unnecessary closures that cause public frustration and inconvenience during shutdowns.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that expanding the definition of 'excepted' employees could undermine the intended fiscal pressure of a government shutdown, potentially making future shutdowns less impactful. They might also raise concerns about the precedent of designating specific access roles as essential, potentially leading to a broader redefinition of 'emergency services' under existing law.

The bill is very short and clearly written, making it easy for any reader to understand its provisions quickly and thoroughly.

Section 1(a) and 1(b)

Mandatory Access to Memorials and Excepted Employee Status During Shutdowns

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires federal agencies, during a government shutdown, to ensure public access to any memorial that is not funded by the federal government but is typically accessed through federal land or facilities. To facilitate this, it classifies federal employees whose official duties involve providing this access as 'excepted' from furlough under 31 U.S.C. 1342, meaning they must continue working and will be paid, overriding standard shutdown procedures for non-essential personnel.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGeneral PublicImpactMaintained access to memorialsMechanismFederal agencies must keep access points openScaleNational, affecting visitors to specific memorial types
GroupFederal EmployeesImpactDesignated as essential/excepted during shutdownsMechanismExempted from furlough under 31 U.S.C. 1342ScaleLimited number of employees whose duties directly relate to memorial access
GroupMemorial Organizations (non-federal)ImpactEnsured continuity of public accessMechanismFederal government maintains access infrastructureScaleBeneficial for organizations managing memorials on or near federal land

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision prevents the arbitrary closure of cherished public memorials, particularly those honoring veterans, during government shutdowns. They emphasize that these memorials are often privately funded and should not be collateral damage in federal budget disputes, and that ensuring access is a matter of respect and public service.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that designating these employees as 'excepted' could be seen as an incremental erosion of the shutdown's intended impact, potentially reducing pressure on Congress to resolve budget impasses. They may also argue that the definition of 'emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property' is being stretched beyond its original intent.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the public's desire for uninterrupted access to memorials with the traditional operational constraints and political leverage associated with government shutdowns. It creates a tension between maintaining public services and the fiscal discipline implied by furloughs.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this