The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 8776·119th Congress·Introduced May 13, 2026

Officer Wellness and Peer Support Act of 2026

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Gillen, Laura [D-NY-4]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
May 13, 2026

Bottom line

The bill requires a federal report outlining strategies and recommendations to improve mental health support and reduce stigma for law enforcement officers, focusing on access and confidentiality.

What it actually does

This bill mandates that the Attorney General, in consultation with several federal agencies, submit a report to Congress within 270 days of enactment. The report must identify effective strategies and best practices to reduce mental health stigma among law enforcement officers, encourage their access to mental health resources, and ensure the confidentiality of these services. It also requires recommendations for implementing these strategies.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill is a crucial and necessary step to address the significant mental health challenges faced by law enforcement officers, acknowledging the unique stressors of their profession. They contend that a comprehensive federal report will provide a vital roadmap for developing and implementing effective, evidence-based strategies to promote officer well-being and reduce the stigma associated with seeking mental health assistance.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the intent is laudable, merely requiring a report is an insufficient response to an urgent and widespread problem, suggesting that more direct action, funding for programs, or immediate policy changes are needed. Some may also view it as creating another bureaucratic layer without a guaranteed timeline for tangible outcomes or a commitment to implement the recommendations.

The bill is exceptionally short and clear, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its provisions and implications quickly.

Section 2(a)

Attorney General Report on Law Enforcement Mental Health Strategies

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Attorney General, in collaboration with the Director of the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of the National Institute of Justice, to submit a report to Congress within 270 days. The report must detail effective strategies and best practices to reduce mental health stigma among law enforcement officers, encourage their use of mental health screenings and counseling, and ensure the confidentiality of these services. It also requires specific recommendations for implementing these identified strategies.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupLaw enforcement officers (Federal, State, Tribal, local)ImpactPotential improvement in mental health support and reduction of stigmaMechanismIdentification and recommendation of best practices and strategiesScaleNational
GroupFederal agencies (DOJ, COPS, FBI, NIJ)ImpactMandated to conduct research, consult stakeholders, and produce a reportMechanismDirect legislative requirementScaleAgency-specific
GroupProfessional law enforcement organizations, mental health and suicide prevention organizationsImpactConsulted during the report preparation process, contributing expertiseMechanismExplicit consultation requirementScaleNational

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that this provision is a critical first step towards a national, coordinated effort to address the mental health crisis within law enforcement. By consolidating best practices and expert recommendations, it provides a solid foundation for future policy and programmatic interventions that are informed and effective.

Critics contend

Opponents might contend that while well-intentioned, this provision only mandates a report, which may delay tangible action. They could argue that the urgency of the mental health crisis among officers requires immediate funding for existing programs or direct policy changes rather than further study.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the need for comprehensive, evidence-based policy development with the immediate urgency of addressing law enforcement mental health. It prioritizes strategic planning and information gathering, which may delay direct intervention but aims for more effective long-term solutions.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this