The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecords

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
3 versions
H.R. 8800·119th Congress·Introduced May 13, 2026

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027

Passed HouseArmed Forces and National SecurityOmnibus
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Rogers, Mike D. [R-AL-3]
Committees
Armed Services Committee (primary), Intelligence (Permanent Select) Committee, Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Appropriations Committee, Small Business Committee, Judiciary Committee, Education and Workforce Committee, Budget Committee, Homeland Security Committee, Energy and Commerce Committee, Natural Resources Committee, Science, Space, and Technology Committee, Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, Veterans' Affairs Committee, Ways and Means Committee
Last action
Sep 14, 2026

Bottom line

The bill authorizes extensive funding and implements broad policy changes across the U.S. defense establishment, with a strong focus on modernization, readiness, and countering foreign adversaries, while also including provisions on domestic issues like election integrity.

What it actually does

This bill, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027, authorizes appropriations for military activities of the Department of Defense (DoD), military construction, and defense activities of the Department of Energy (DOE) for fiscal year 2027. It also prescribes military personnel strengths for the fiscal year and includes numerous policy provisions across various defense-related areas, ranging from procurement and research to personnel policy, healthcare, acquisition reform, and cybersecurity. A significant portion of the bill is dedicated to strengthening the defense industrial base and addressing strategic competition with foreign adversaries.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the bill is essential for maintaining national security, modernizing the military to address evolving threats from peer competitors like China and Russia, and ensuring the well-being of service members and their families. They contend that robust investment in defense capabilities, research, and the industrial base is critical for deterrence and global leadership. Proponents also highlight provisions aimed at improving military quality of life, healthcare access, and addressing specific domestic concerns.

Opponents contend

Critics of the bill, or specific provisions within it, often raise concerns about the overall level of defense spending, arguing that it is excessive or diverts resources from other pressing national needs. Some may also object to specific policy riders, such as those related to election integrity, as being unrelated to defense and potentially controversial. Concerns about the pace of modernization, effectiveness of certain programs, and potential for waste or lack of accountability in large defense contracts are also common.

This is an extremely lengthy and detailed omnibus bill. An informed reader would require several hours to thoroughly review the text. Given its complexity and breadth, the time required for comprehensive understanding is substantial, making it challenging for rapid public review.

Sec. 115, Title I, Division A

Minimum Inventory Requirement for Stryker A1 Combat Vehicles

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that the Army maintain a minimum inventory of not fewer than 1,524 deployable Stryker DVH A1 combat vehicles in its Stryker Brigade Combat Teams until December 31, 2030. This requirement does not apply to vehicles deemed no longer mission capable and uneconomical to repair due to accidents or degradation.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. ArmyImpactEnsures sustained operational capability and readiness for Stryker Brigade Combat Teams.MechanismMandatory inventory levelScaleHigh
GroupDefense Industrial Base (Stryker manufacturers)ImpactProvides stable demand for production and sustainment of Stryker vehicles.MechanismGuaranteed procurement/maintenance needsScaleMedium

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that this minimum inventory level is crucial for maintaining the combat readiness and deployability of Army Stryker brigades, ensuring they have the necessary equipment to meet operational demands and respond to threats effectively.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against this provision, as maintaining adequate equipment levels is generally supported for military readiness. Potential concerns, if any, might relate to the cost-effectiveness of maintaining older platforms versus investing in newer technologies, but such arguments are usually broad rather than targeting specific inventory minimums.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the need for current readiness with potential future modernization efforts, ensuring a baseline capability while allowing for flexibility in managing aging assets.

Sec. 123, Title I, Division A

Multiyear Procurement Authority for Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section grants the Secretary of the Navy authority to enter into one or more multiyear contracts, starting in fiscal year 2027, for the procurement of up to 15 Arleigh Burke class Flight III guided missile destroyers. It also allows for advance procurement of components and requires prepriced options for additional destroyers if the initial quantity is less than 15. A limitation is placed on contract modifications that would increase the target price by more than 10 percent.

Sec. 147, Title I, Division A

Limitation on Retirement of MQ-9 Reaper Aircraft

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section prohibits the Air Force from retiring, divesting, or transferring to nonoperational status any MQ-9 Reaper aircraft in fiscal year 2027. After September 30, 2027, such actions are prohibited until the Secretary of the Air Force certifies that a replacement capability has achieved initial operational capability, provides comparable or superior capabilities, is available in sufficient quantities, and will not degrade ongoing operations. Combatant commander assessments are also required prior to any future retirement.

Sec. 220, Title II, Division A

Establishment of Synthetic Training Environment to Support Indo-Pacific Operations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section mandates the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Commander of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, to establish a synthetic training environment within 180 days. This environment must integrate live, virtual, and constructive elements, support all warfighting domains, enable distributed training for joint and combined forces, and be accessible to allies and partners. A report on implementation, costs, and effects on readiness is required.

Sec. 236, Title II, Division A

Prohibition on Availability of Funds for Gain of Function Research

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section prohibits the Department of Defense from obligating or expending funds in fiscal year 2027 for gain-of-function research on potential pandemic pathogens at any DoD facility or through contracts, grants, or financial assistance to external entities. A waiver is permitted on a case-by-case basis for national interest, with a 30-day congressional notification.

Sec. 315, Title III, Division A

Program for Deployment of Transportable Nuclear Microreactor in Indo-Pacific Command

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section mandates the Secretary of Defense to establish a program for the deployment, operation, and evaluation of a transportable nuclear microreactor in the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command area of responsibility by January 1, 2030. The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy, and Environment is designated as the executive agent, coordinating with INDOPACOM, DOE, and NRC to ensure safe and secure deployment. Objectives include supporting distributed and expeditionary operations in contested logistics environments, with a priority for the Western Pacific.

Sec. 316, Title III, Division A

Prohibition on Operation of Connected Vehicles from Foreign Entities of Concern on DoD Property

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section prohibits the operation of connected vehicles designed, developed, manufactured, or supplied by foreign entities of concern on Department of Defense property. Phase 1 begins January 1, 2027, for vehicles designated by the Department of Commerce. Phase 2, effective January 1, 2029, expands the prohibition to a list of vehicles established by the Secretary of Defense. A waiver is possible for national security interests with congressional notification.

Sec. 329, Title III, Division A

Army Expansion of Production of 155mm Artillery Ammunition

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section expresses a Sense of Congress that robust domestic production of 155mm artillery ammunition is critical. It mandates the Secretary of the Army to expand and upgrade facilities to increase 155mm artillery ammunition production to a minimum rate of 100,000 rounds per month for each type, ensuring total munition requirements are met. A report on implementation, funding, and timelines is required.

Sec. 401, Title IV, Division A

End Strengths for Active Forces

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes the active duty personnel end strengths for each branch of the Armed Forces as of September 30, 2027. The authorized strengths are: Army (469,000), Navy (356,600), Marine Corps (173,700), Air Force (330,400), and Space Force (13,200).

Sec. 514, Title V, Division A

Requirement of Equal Opportunity, Racial Neutrality, and Exclusive Use of Merit in Military Personnel Actions

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that all Department of Defense military personnel actions (accessions, promotions, assignments, schooling) be based exclusively on individual merit, fitness, capability, and performance. It explicitly prohibits the consideration of an individual's race, ethnicity, or national origin in these actions, with a limited exception for specific, unconventional missions in foreign countries requiring combatant commander approval and congressional reporting.

Sec. 561, Title V, Division A

Establishment of Separation Oath for Members of the Armed Forces

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section establishes a voluntary 'Separation Oath' for members of the Armed Forces prior to retirement or other separation (excluding court-martial). The oath includes commitments to support the Constitution, be a 'keeper of my brothers- and sisters-in-arms and protector of the United States,' preserve values, maintain physical and mental health, seek/give help to fellow veterans, and avoid self-harm or harm to others. The section includes findings on the importance of oaths and veteran suicide rates.

Sec. 611, Title VI, Division A

Basic Needs Allowance: Exclusion of Basic Allowance for Housing from Gross Household Income

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the Basic Needs Allowance calculation to exclude the Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) from the 'gross household income' of an eligible service member. This change aims to make more service members eligible for the allowance by reducing their calculated income.

Sec. 709, Title VII, Division A

Prohibition on Coverage of Gender-Related Medical Treatment Under TRICARE

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section prohibits TRICARE from covering or furnishing 'gender-related medical treatment' for service members and their dependents, with exceptions for treating disorders of sex development, ambiguous biological sex characteristics, or conditions caused/exacerbated by prior gender-related treatment. It defines 'gender' as synonymous with 'sex' (biological male/female) and explicitly excludes 'gender identity.' It lists specific surgical procedures, hormone therapies, and puberty blockers as prohibited treatments.

Sec. 801, Title VIII, Division A

Portfolio Acquisition Executives: Performance Management Authorities with Respect to Contractors

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section grants Portfolio Acquisition Executives (PAEs) new authorities to manage contractor performance. These include issuing performance improvement notices for deficient contractors, initiating contract restructuring actions (within certain thresholds) without prior approval, and recommending contract termination for cause. It also establishes a process for higher-level review if a PAE's action is overridden and requires annual reporting to Congress on the use of these authorities.

Sec. 802, Title VIII, Division A

Codification of Use of Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Source Selection Process

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section codifies a policy for the Department of Defense to avoid using 'lowest price technically acceptable' (LPTA) source selection criteria in situations where cost and technical tradeoffs would be beneficial. It mandates that LPTA be used only when minimum requirements are clearly defined, there's minimal value in exceeding them, subjective judgment is minimal, and the lowest price reflects full life-cycle costs. It also explicitly advises against LPTA for knowledge-based services, personal protective equipment, and training/logistics in contingency operations.

Sec. 824, Title VIII, Division A

Requirement for Modular Open System Approach and Modifications to Rights in Technical Data

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section mandates that covered defense systems be designed and developed with a modular open system approach (MOSA) to enhance military effectiveness, speed technology integration, and reduce complexity. It outlines specific architecture requirements for open interfaces, including the use of existing or new standards, and requires a digital repository for MOSA artifacts. It also modifies technical data rights, establishing 'government purpose rights' as the default for deliverables unless contractors prove entitlement to more restrictive rights, and clarifies exceptions for certain data types.

Sec. 1001, Title X, Division A

General Transfer Authority

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section grants the Secretary of Defense authority to transfer up to $6 billion in authorized appropriations for fiscal year 2027 between any DoD authorizations or subdivisions. Transferred amounts merge with the receiving authorization for the same purposes. Transfers between military personnel authorizations do not count against the $6 billion limit. The authority can only be used for higher priority items, not for items denied by Congress, and cannot reduce funding for military unaccompanied housing or child development centers.

Sec. 1007, Title X, Division A

Department of Defense Spending Reductions in Absence of Submitted Financial Statements or Failure to Achieve Unqualified or Qualified Independent Audit Opinion

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section mandates a 0.5% reduction in discretionary budget authority for the Department of Defense (or a military department/Defense Agency if audited separately) on March 2 of each fiscal year if it has not submitted a financial statement for the previous fiscal year or if that statement has not received an unqualified or qualified audit opinion. The reduction is applied proportionately across accounts, excluding military personnel and Defense Health Program accounts. The President can waive the reduction for national security or deployed service members.

Sec. 1091, Title X, Division A

Deeming References to the Department of Defense and Secretary of Defense as References to the Department of War and Secretary of War

buried in fine printstraightforward

This section amends Chapter 1 of Title 10, U.S. Code, to state that any reference to the 'Secretary of Defense' or 'Department of Defense' in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the 'Secretary of War' or 'Department of War,' respectively.

Sec. 1101, Title XI, Division A

Limitation on Outside Income for Individuals in Office of the Secretary of Defense

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section prohibits covered employees (special Government employees, uncompensated officers/employees, reserve component members) in the Office of the Secretary of Defense from receiving outside earned income unless a designated agency ethics official reviews it and certifies it's unrelated to official duties, the individual has no official business before DoD, and is not representing a foreign agent/government. Such determinations must be publicly published, and individuals must file a public financial disclosure report within 30 days of receiving such income.

Sec. 1249A, Title XII, Division A

Modification of Authorization of Sale to Australia of In-Service Virginia Class Submarines

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the AUKUS Submarine Transfer Authorization Act to increase the number of in-service Virginia Class submarines authorized for sale to Australia from two to three. It removes a previous authorization for the transfer of 'not more than one additional Virginia Class submarine to the Government of Australia on a sale basis,' streamlining the transfer process to a fixed number of three in-service submarines.

Sec. 1761-1773, Division D

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Collection At the National Archives and Records Administration (SAVE America Act)

prominently featuredhighly complex

This subtitle, titled the 'Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Collection At the National Archives and Records Administration,' mandates the establishment of a collection of records at the National Archives related to UAP, technologies of unknown origin, and non-human intelligence. It sets requirements for Government offices to identify, organize, and transmit these records, prohibiting destruction or reclassification of previously disclosed records. It also establishes an independent 'Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Review Board' to review postponement decisions, with presidential authority for final disclosure decisions. The Board can compel testimony and records, and witnesses are granted immunity. The Federal Government is mandated to exercise eminent domain over any recovered technologies of unknown origin and biological evidence of non-human intelligence controlled by private entities.

Sec. 2101, Title XXI, Division B

Authorized Army Construction and Land Acquisition Projects

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes specific military construction and land acquisition projects for the Army both inside and outside the United States for fiscal year 2027. Notable projects include significant funding for Joint Region Marianas in Guam ($155 million), Wheeler Army Air Field in Hawaii ($380 million), and Joint Base San Antonio in Texas ($918 million).

Sec. 2201, Title XXII, Division B

Authorized Navy Construction and Land Acquisition Projects

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes specific military construction and land acquisition projects for the Navy and Marine Corps, both inside and outside the United States, for fiscal year 2027. Key projects include substantial funding for Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in Washington ($14.759 billion), Joint Region Marianas in Guam ($1.346 billion), and Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay in Georgia ($490.55 million).

Sec. 2301, Title XXIII, Division B

Authorized Air Force Construction and Land Acquisition Projects

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes specific military construction and land acquisition projects for the Air Force and Space Force, both inside and outside the United States, for fiscal year 2027. Major projects include significant funding for Redstone Arsenal in Alabama ($2.05 billion), Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska ($2.066 billion), and Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana ($1.39 billion).

Sec. 2401, Title XXIV, Division B

Authorized Defense Agencies Construction and Land Acquisition Projects

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes specific military construction and land acquisition projects for various Defense Agencies (other than military departments) for fiscal year 2027. Significant projects include Fort Meade in Maryland ($1.393 billion), Wake Island ($1.652 billion), and Joint Region Marianas in Guam ($315.286 million).

Sec. 2501, Title XXV, Division B

Authorized NATO Security Investment Program Contributions

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes $604.27 million for U.S. contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Security Investment Program for fiscal year 2027. These funds are for projects that enhance NATO's collective defense capabilities, with the amount being the sum collected from NATO for previously U.S.-financed construction.

Sec. 2601-2605, Title XXVI, Division B

Authorized Guard and Reserve Forces Facilities

prominently featuredstraightforward

These sections authorize military construction projects for the Army National Guard, Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Air National Guard for fiscal year 2027. Projects are specified by location and amount, including significant investments in facilities like Camp Blanding, Florida ($28 million for Army NG), Fort Carson, Colorado ($92 million for Army Reserve), Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Florida ($47 million for Navy Reserve), and Selfridge Air National Guard Base, Michigan ($425 million for Air NG).

Sec. 2701, Title XXVII, Division B

Authorization of Appropriations for Base Realignment and Closure Activities

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes appropriations for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2026, for Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) activities. These funds are for real property acquisition and military construction projects authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, and are funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account.

Sec. 3101, Title XXXI, Division C

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Weapons Activities Authorization

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section authorizes $27.586 billion for fiscal year 2027 for the National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Weapons Activities. This includes funding for stockpile management (e.g., B61-13, W80-4 LEP, W87-1, W93 programs), plutonium modernization (Los Alamos and Savannah River), secondary capability modernization (Uranium Processing Facility), tritium and defense fuels, non-nuclear capability modernization, and infrastructure and operations. It also authorizes a new plant project for the Plutonium Engineering Support Building at Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Sec. 3501, Title XXXV, Division C

Authorization of Appropriations for Maritime Administration

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section authorizes over $2.1 billion for the Maritime Administration for fiscal year 2027. Key allocations include $873.5 million for the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy (including $624 million for capital improvement projects), $53.4 million for State maritime academies, $75 million for the National Security Multi-Mission Vessel program, $400.5 million for the Maritime Security Program, $167.6 million for the Tanker Security Program, $105 million for small shipyards, and $550 million for the port infrastructure development program (with limitations on automated cargo handling equipment).

Sec. 4802, Division E

Ensuring Only Citizens Are Registered to Vote in Elections for Federal Office

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section amends the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require applicants to register to vote in federal elections to present 'documentary proof of United States citizenship.' It defines acceptable forms of proof, including passports, military IDs, birth certificates, and naturalization certificates. It mandates states to verify citizenship for all applicants, including those registering at motor vehicle agencies or by mail, and to remove non-citizens from voter rolls. It also requires federal agencies to provide citizenship information to state election officials upon request, free of charge, and mandates investigations for unlawful non-citizen registration.

Sec. 4803, Division E

Requiring Voters to Provide Photo Identification

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section amends the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require individuals voting in federal elections to present a valid physical photo identification. For in-person voters without ID, a provisional ballot can be cast if they present ID within 3 days or an affidavit of religious objection. For non-in-person voters, a copy of valid photo ID or the last four digits of their Social Security number with an affidavit of inability to obtain a copy is required. Exceptions are made for absent uniformed services voters and disabled voters. States must provide public access to digital imaging devices for copying IDs free of charge and notify applicants of these requirements.

FOUND

This section mandates that all references to the 'Secretary of Defense' and 'Department of Defense' in existing law, regulations, and documents be deemed references to the 'Secretary of War' and 'Department of War,' respectively.

Sec. 1091, Title X, Division A

Why it matters:This is a highly symbolic and potentially controversial change in nomenclature for the entire defense establishment. Placing it within a general provisions title, rather than a dedicated organizational title, might reduce immediate scrutiny compared to a more prominent placement. It could be seen as a tactical maneuver to implement a significant change without drawing excessive attention.

Case for: Proponents might argue that this change reflects a more traditional or historically accurate name for the department, emphasizing its core mission. They may believe it restores a sense of gravity or purpose to the defense establishment. It could also be seen as a symbolic rejection of perceived mission creep or bureaucratic expansion.

Case against: Critics would argue that this is a purely symbolic and potentially costly administrative change with no substantive benefit to national security or military effectiveness. It would require extensive updates to countless documents, systems, and public-facing materials. It could also be seen as a political statement rather than a practical reform, potentially causing confusion and diverting resources from more pressing issues.

Estimated impact: High administrative cost for renaming documents and systems across the entire DoD. Significant symbolic impact on the identity and public perception of the U.S. military.

FOUND

This section mandates the Federal Government to exercise eminent domain over any and all 'recovered technologies of unknown origin' and 'biological evidence of non-human intelligence' that may be controlled by private persons or entities, in the interests of the public good. Such material must be made available to the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Review Board for examination and disclosure determination.

Sec. 1767, Division D

Why it matters:The subject matter is highly sensitive and potentially controversial, involving claims of non-human intelligence and advanced technology. Embedding the eminent domain authority within a broader transparency initiative might be a tactical choice to facilitate its passage, as a standalone eminent domain bill for such materials would likely face intense scrutiny and skepticism.

Case for: Proponents argue that if such materials exist, they represent matters of profound national security and scientific importance that cannot be left in private hands. Exercising eminent domain ensures that the government can properly study, secure, and potentially disclose these materials for the benefit of all humanity, preventing private exploitation or concealment.

Case against: Critics would argue that this provision represents an unprecedented expansion of government power, potentially infringing on property rights without clear justification or due process. They might question the scientific basis for such a mandate and express concerns about potential misuse of such authority or the creation of a 'treasure hunt' for speculative materials.

Estimated impact: Potentially revolutionary impact on science, national security, and public understanding if such materials are found and acquired. High legal and ethical implications regarding property rights and government authority.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
  • Riders
  • Tactical maneuvers
  • Process critique
  • Transparency