In God We Trust Act
- Sponsor
- Rep. Miller, Mary E. [R-IL-15]
- Committees
- Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
- Last action
- May 14, 2026
Bottom line
The "In God We Trust Act" requires the prominent display of the national motto on all federal buildings, aiming to reinforce a national symbol.
What it actually does
This bill mandates that the Administrator of General Services (GSA) display or inscribe the national motto of the United States, "In God We Trust," in a place of prominence on every federal public building. The GSA is required to complete this implementation within one year after the bill's enactment. The definition of "public building" is referenced from existing federal law.
Proponents argue
Supporters argue that displaying the national motto, "In God We Trust," on federal buildings is a reaffirmation of a core American value and a historical tradition, serving as a reminder of the nation's spiritual heritage and unity. They contend it is a simple, symbolic act that honors a deeply held sentiment by many citizens and reinforces a widely recognized national emblem.
Opponents contend
Opponents might argue that mandating the display of "In God We Trust" on all federal buildings could be seen as a violation of the separation of church and state, potentially alienating citizens who do not subscribe to a belief in God or who adhere to different faiths. They may contend that while the motto is historical, its prominent display could be perceived as governmental endorsement of religion, infringing on religious freedom and inclusivity.
The bill is exceptionally short and straightforward, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.
Section 2(b)
Mandatory Display of National Motto on Federal Buildings
This section requires the General Services Administration (GSA) to ensure that the national motto of the United States, "In God We Trust," is either inscribed or prominently displayed on every federal public building. The GSA must complete this task within one year after the bill becomes law. This applies to buildings as defined under existing federal law (40 U.S.C. 3301(a)).
Supporters argue
Supporters argue this provision reinforces a fundamental aspect of American heritage and national identity, promoting a sense of unity and patriotism by visibly affirming the national motto in public spaces. They believe it is a respectful and appropriate display of a long-standing national symbol.
Critics contend
Critics contend this provision could be perceived as a government endorsement of religion, potentially violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and making individuals of non-theistic or minority religious beliefs feel excluded or marginalized in federal spaces. They argue it could lead to legal challenges and unnecessary expenditure.
Tradeoffs
The provision balances the desire to publicly affirm a national motto with concerns about maintaining strict separation of church and state and ensuring inclusivity for all citizens, regardless of their religious or non-religious beliefs. It also involves a tradeoff between symbolic expression and the allocation of public funds for its implementation.