Protecting Our Democracy Act
- Sponsor
- Rep. Raskin, Jamie [D-MD-8]
- Committees
- Ways and Means Committee (primary)
- Last action
- May 14, 2026
Bottom line
This comprehensive bill seeks to strengthen democratic institutions and ethical governance by imposing new restrictions on presidential authority, enhancing congressional oversight, and tightening election integrity rules.
What it actually does
The Protecting Our Democracy Act is an omnibus bill designed to curb potential abuses of presidential power, enhance government accountability and transparency, and safeguard elections from foreign interference. It introduces significant reforms across various areas, including presidential pardons, emoluments, congressional subpoena enforcement, budget impoundment, whistleblower protections, Hatch Act enforcement, and campaign finance regulations. The bill aims to reinforce the separation of powers and ethical standards within the executive branch and in federal elections.
Proponents argue
Supporters argue that the bill is a critical response to perceived vulnerabilities in the current system, asserting that it will prevent future abuses of power, restore public trust in government, and ensure that no individual is above the law. They contend that its provisions are essential for maintaining checks and balances, protecting whistleblowers, and defending the integrity of elections against both domestic and foreign threats.
Opponents contend
Critics may argue that the bill overreaches by unduly restricting presidential authority, potentially hindering effective governance and the President's ability to act decisively in national interest. Concerns could be raised about the administrative burden of new reporting requirements, the potential for politicization of investigations, and whether some provisions infringe upon executive privilege or the President's constitutional powers, particularly regarding pardons and foreign policy.
The bill is extensive and highly complex, requiring significant time for a thorough review. Given its omnibus nature, the time required to understand its full implications far exceeds what is typically afforded for public or legislative review.
Division A, Title XI, Sec. 1102
Congressional Oversight of Certain Pardons
This provision mandates that the Attorney General submit to Congress all materials related to an offense for which a pardon was granted, if the pardoned individual is the President, a relative, a former President, a political appointee, or a campaign employee, or if the offense was motivated by their personal interest. This aims to increase transparency and congressional scrutiny over presidential pardon decisions in sensitive cases.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue this provision is crucial to prevent the abuse of the pardon power, ensuring that pardons are not used to obstruct justice or shield allies from accountability. It provides a necessary check on executive authority.
Critics contend
Critics might contend that this provision could infringe upon the President's constitutional pardon power and potentially expose sensitive investigative information, politicizing the pardon process and deterring individuals from cooperating with investigations if they fear their information will be made public.
Tradeoffs
This provision balances the need for executive independence in pardon decisions with the imperative for congressional oversight to prevent abuses of power, particularly when the President's personal or political interests are involved.
Division A, Title XI, Sec. 1104
Prohibition on Presidential Self-Pardon
This section explicitly states that a President's grant of a pardon to himself or herself is void and has no legal effect. It clarifies that such an act would not remove judicial jurisdiction or confer immunity from investigation or prosecution.
Division A, Title XII, Sec. 1202
Tolling of Statute of Limitations for President/Vice President
This section amends federal law to ensure that the duration of a person's tenure as President or Vice President is not counted towards any statute of limitations for federal criminal offenses committed by that person. This means the clock on prosecuting crimes would pause while they are in office, allowing for potential prosecution after they leave.
Division A, Title XIII, Sec. 1303
Prohibition on Acceptance of Foreign Emoluments
This section makes it unlawful for any person holding an office of profit or trust under the United States (including the President and Vice President) to accept any present, emolument, payment, office, or title from a foreign government without congressional consent. It clarifies that this applies whether the benefit is direct or indirect, or through a private business interest.
Division A, Title XIII, Sec. 1304
Civil Actions by Congress Concerning Foreign Emoluments
This section grants the Senate or House of Representatives the authority to bring a civil action against any person for violating the prohibition on foreign emoluments. Such actions would be heard by a three-judge court in the D.C. District Court, with direct appeal to the Supreme Court, and remedies could include disgorgement of funds or renunciation of titles.
Division A, Title XIV, Sec. 1402
Presidential Oversight of Attorney General in Criminal Prosecutions
This section requires the Attorney General to submit a sworn statement if the government seeks to dismiss a criminal prosecution against the President or President-elect, attesting whether the dismissal was ordered by the President or anyone acting under their direction. A three-judge court would then determine if the dismissal is appropriate, considering factors like bad faith or political motivation.
Division B, Title XXI, Sec. 2102
Enforcement of Congressional Subpoenas
This section creates a specific cause of action for the Senate, House, or a committee to bring a civil action in federal court to enforce congressional subpoenas. It mandates expedited judicial review, allows for monetary penalties against agency heads who knowingly fail to comply (unless instructed by the President with a written basis), and requires payment of legal fees by non-government defendants who willfully fail to comply.
Division B, Title XXII, Sec. 2221
Strengthening Congressional Control to Prevent Impoundment
This section amends the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to prevent the President from deferring or withholding budget authority during the 90-day period before its expiration. It requires that budget authority be made available in sufficient time for prudent obligation and that apportionments not include preconditions that hinder obligation.
Division B, Title XXII, Sec. 2225
Penalties for Failure to Comply with Impoundment Control Act
This section introduces administrative discipline, including suspension or removal from office, for executive branch officers or employees who violate the Impoundment Control Act. It also requires immediate reporting to Congress, the Comptroller General, and relevant Inspector General of any violations, including details of the violation, responsible individuals, and disciplinary actions taken.
Division B, Title XXII, Sec. 2251
Requirement to Respond to GAO Requests for Budget and Appropriations Law Decisions
This section mandates that federal agencies respond to written requests for information, documentation, or views from the Comptroller General (GAO) regarding budget or appropriations law decisions within 20 days. Failure to comply allows the Comptroller General to bring a civil action in the D.C. District Court to compel production.
Division B, Title XXII, Sec. 2261
Improving Checks and Balances on National Emergencies Act
This section significantly reforms the National Emergencies Act. It requires congressional approval (via a joint resolution) for a national emergency declaration to remain in effect beyond 20 legislative/session days, and for its renewal annually. It also mandates that emergency powers invoked must relate to the nature of the emergency and cannot be used for programs Congress has withheld funding for. It also excludes the authority to impose duties or tariff-rate quotas under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Division B, Title XXIII, Sec. 2303
Communications Logs for Department of Justice and Executive Office of the President
This section requires the Attorney General to maintain a log of 'covered communications' (those related to contemplated or ongoing investigations or litigation) between the Department of Justice and the Executive Office of the President. The log must include participants, topic, purpose, and necessity. Exceptions are made for certain high-level communications and national security matters, but not for cases involving the President, VP, their families, or senior campaign officials. The logs are periodically disclosed to the DOJ Inspector General, who notifies Congress of inappropriate communications.
Division B, Title XXIV, Sec. 2421
Additional Whistleblower Protections
This section expands whistleblower protections by classifying the commencement, expansion, or extension of an investigation (with exceptions) and referrals to an Inspector General as 'personnel actions' that can be retaliatory. It also prohibits willful disclosure of a whistleblower's identity to non-government officials without consent, and strengthens the right of federal employees to petition or furnish information to Congress.
Division B, Title XXV, Sec. 2502
Clarification of Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998
This section tightens rules for acting officials. It requires a 'first assistant' to have served in that position for at least 30 days prior to a vacancy to be eligible to serve as acting head, and that the position itself be designated as 'first assistant' 30 days in advance. It also requires acting officials to possess the qualifications for the permanent role, applies the act to officials removed from office, and shortens the time limit for acting heads of major agencies to 120 days. Acting officials must also appear before Congress every 60 days.
Division B, Title XXVI, Sec. 2621
Strengthening Hatch Act Enforcement and Penalties Against Political Appointees
This section expands the Office of Special Counsel's (OSC) authority to investigate Hatch Act violations by political appointees, allowing OSC to seek corrective and disciplinary action. It permits the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) to impose civil penalties up to $50,000 for violations by political appointees if the President does not take action within 90 days. It also requires the President to report on disciplinary actions taken and OSC to report on investigations and communications to Congress and the public. It also introduces a criminal penalty of up to $50,000 and/or 1 year imprisonment for knowing violations.
Division B, Title XXVI, Sec. 2625
Applying Hatch Act to President and Vice President While on Federal Property
This section extends the prohibitions on political activity under the Hatch Act (sections 7323(a) and 7324) to the President and Vice President while they are on or in any part of the White House or White House grounds regularly used for official duties. This means they would be subject to restrictions on engaging in partisan political activities in those official spaces.
Division B, Title XXVI, Sec. 2642
Ethics Pledge for Executive Branch Appointees
This section requires all Executive agency appointees (including senior White House staff) to sign a legally binding ethics pledge. The pledge includes a lobbyist gift ban, a 2-year revolving door ban on participating in matters related to former employers/clients, and specific restrictions for former lobbyists entering government. It also imposes post-government employment restrictions, a 'golden parachute' ban on payments contingent on entering government, and a commitment to merit-based hiring.
Division B, Title XXVII, Sec. 2701
Presidential and Vice Presidential Tax Transparency
This section requires major party candidates for President and Vice President to submit their income tax returns for the 10 most recent taxable years to the Federal Election Commission (FEC). The President and Vice President must annually submit their returns for the current and 9 preceding years. If not submitted, the FEC Chairman can request them from the Treasury Secretary. The FEC must then make these returns publicly available, with redactions for identity theft protection.
Division B, Title XXVIII, Sec. 2802
Office of Inspector General in the Executive Office of the President
This section establishes an Inspector General (IG) for the Executive Office of the President (EOP), appointed by the President. The EOP IG would conduct audits and investigations, with some limitations on access to classified or sensitive information if the President determines it necessary. The EOP IG must submit semiannual reports to the President, who then transmits them to Congress. The Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency will also audit the EOP IG's office annually.
Division C, Title XXXI, Sec. 3101
Federal Campaign Reporting of Foreign Contacts
This section requires political committees to notify the FBI and FEC within one week of a 'reportable foreign contact' and provide a summary. Candidates and their immediate family members, and committee officials/employees/agents, must notify their committee treasurer within 3 days. A 'reportable foreign contact' involves communication with a known or reasonably believed 'covered foreign national' that involves an offer of prohibited contributions/donations or coordination/collaboration in connection with an election. Exceptions exist for official capacity contacts by elected officials and election observation, unless prohibited disbursements are involved.
Division C, Title XXXII, Sec. 3201
Clarification of Application of Foreign Money Ban
This section clarifies that the prohibition on foreign money in U.S. elections includes the provision of opposition research, polling, or other non-public information relating to a candidate, regardless of monetary value. It also strengthens the ban to cover all contributions/donations of 'things of value' and all solicitations thereof. It introduces enhanced criminal penalties for violations involving foreign governments/political parties or the provision of non-public information.
Division C, Title XXXIII, Sec. 3302
Expansion of Definition of Public Communication and Electioneering Communication to Online Platforms ('Honest Ads Act')
This section expands the definition of 'public communication' and 'electioneering communication' under federal election law to include 'paid internet or paid digital communication.' This extends existing disclosure and disclaimer requirements for political advertising to online platforms. It also clarifies that news stories, commentary, or editorials distributed online are exempt unless owned or controlled by a political party, committee, or candidate.
Division C, Title XXXIV, Sec. 3402
Limitations on Excepting Positions from Competitive Service and Transferring Positions ('Saving the Civil Service Act')
This section limits the ability to move federal positions out of the competitive service, restricting exceptions to schedules A-E as they existed on Sept 30, 2020. It requires OPM consent for agencies to transfer occupied positions into Schedule C. It also caps the number of competitive service employees an agency can transfer to the excepted service during a presidential term (1% or 5 employees, whichever is greater) and requires employee consent for such transfers.
Division C, Title XXXV, Sec. 3501
Prohibition on Use of Federal Property for Political Conventions
This section prohibits national political party conventions for nominating presidential or vice-presidential candidates from being held on or in any federal property, including the White House grounds (with an exception for the second floor of the Executive Residence). Violators, including candidates or their committees, face civil penalties of fair market value or $50,000 (whichever is greater), or up to five years imprisonment, or both.
Division C, Title XXXVI, Sec. 3602
Restriction on Service in the Executive Branch ('No Corporate Crooks Act')
This section makes individuals finally convicted of a 'covered crime' (corruption-related offenses, copyright infringement, cybercrime, embezzlement, fraud, insider trading, wage theft, tax evasion, or comparable state offenses) ineligible for appointment to a position in the executive branch if any part of the conduct occurred while they were a chief executive officer of a non-federal entity. Individuals already serving who meet this criteria would be removed.
Division C, Title XXXVII, Sec. 3702
Recusal of Executive Branch Officers and Employees in Matters Affecting Financial Interests of Previous Employers ('Stop MUSK Act')
This section expands existing recusal requirements for executive branch officers and employees. It mandates recusal from matters affecting the financial interests of any organization for which the individual, during the 4-year period preceding their participation, served as an officer, director, trustee, general partner, agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, employee, or direct competitor. It also includes organizations in which the individual is an active participant (excluding political organizations).
Division C, Title XXXVIII, Sec. 3802
Clarification of Definition of Official Act ('Closing Bribery Loopholes Act')
This section clarifies the definition of 'official act' for bribery purposes. It states that an 'official act' means any act within the range of official duty, and any decision, recommendation, or action on any matter pending or brought before a public official in their official capacity, including pardons, commutations, or reprieves. It further clarifies that an official act can be a single act, multiple acts, or a course of conduct, and can occur whether or not it successfully achieves a desired outcome.
Amends 18 U.S.C. 201 (Bribery of Public Officials and Witnesses) to explicitly include the President and Vice President in the definition of 'public official' and to clarify that 'anything of value' includes any pardon, commutation, or reprieve, or an offer thereof. It also expands the definition of 'public official' to include apparent successful candidates for President and Vice President.
Division A, Title XI, Sec. 1103
Why it matters:Amending existing code sections is standard legislative practice. The specific inclusion of pardons and apparent candidates is a targeted clarification to address specific concerns, which might not be immediately obvious without detailed legal analysis.
Case for: Supporters argue this closes a critical loophole, ensuring that bribery related to pardons or during the presidential transition period is explicitly covered by federal law, preventing corruption at the highest levels of government.
Case against: Critics might argue that expanding the definition to 'apparent successful candidates' could be vague and lead to premature legal scrutiny, potentially interfering with the transition process. They might also contend that existing bribery laws were already broad enough.
Estimated impact: Potentially significant impact on the legal accountability of incoming and outgoing administrations regarding clemency and other official acts.
Grants the Director of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) new enforcement authority for emoluments violations. This includes ordering corrective action, requiring disgorgement and divestiture of foreign payments, issuing administrative fines, and bringing civil actions to enforce fines and orders. OGE is also tasked with developing and promulgating rules and regulations for compliance and reporting.
Division A, Title XIII, Sec. 1307
Why it matters:Amending existing statutes is common. The detailed expansion of OGE's powers is a technical but crucial aspect of the bill's emoluments enforcement strategy, making it a 'buried treasure' for those not familiar with OGE's current authorities.
Case for: Supporters argue that OGE currently lacks sufficient enforcement teeth for emoluments violations. This provision empowers an independent ethics office to proactively investigate and penalize violations, ensuring robust oversight.
Case against: Critics might argue that granting OGE such broad enforcement powers, including administrative fines and civil action authority, could lead to overreach or politicization of an ethics office that traditionally provides guidance. Concerns about due process for those subject to OGE's new powers might also be raised.
Estimated impact: Significantly enhances the OGE's role from an advisory body to a direct enforcement agency for emoluments, potentially leading to more aggressive pursuit of violations.
Requires the President to establish and regularly update a publicly available database of 'covered records' (visitor names, individuals met, purpose of visit) for the White House, Vice President's residence, and other official business locations. Exceptions are made for personal privacy, law enforcement, national security, purely personal guests, and sensitive meetings (where only visitor count is posted initially).
Division C, Title XXXV, Sec. 3502
Why it matters:While a standalone section, its placement in a 'Miscellaneous' division might suggest it's not a primary focus of the bill, though its impact on executive branch transparency is substantial.
Case for: Supporters argue that this provision is crucial for transparency, allowing the public to see who is influencing the President and Vice President, thereby reducing the potential for undisclosed lobbying or special access.
Case against: Critics might argue that this could create security risks by publicly identifying visitors, or that it could deter individuals from meeting with the President on sensitive matters if their visit is immediately publicized. They might also contend that the exceptions are too broad or too narrow.
Estimated impact: Significantly increases transparency regarding who visits the White House and other official residences, potentially impacting lobbying and access dynamics.