The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 8868·119th Congress·Introduced May 15, 2026

Restoring Overtime Pay Act of 2026

IntroducedLabor and EmploymentMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Takano, Mark [D-CA-39]
Committees
Education and Workforce Committee (primary)
Last action
May 15, 2026

Bottom line

This bill substantially expands overtime eligibility for millions of salaried workers by raising and automatically updating the salary threshold for FLSA exemptions and tightening the duties test.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) to significantly raise the minimum salary threshold for executive, administrative, and professional (EAP) employees to be exempt from federal overtime pay requirements. It establishes a phased increase from $45,000 in 2026 to $75,000 in 2029, and then mandates annual automatic updates based on the 55th percentile of national weekly earnings for full-time salaried workers. Additionally, it limits the amount of non-exempt duties EAP employees can perform to 20% of their work time.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that the current overtime salary threshold is outdated and allows many workers who are effectively middle-class to be denied overtime pay, leading to stagnant wages and economic insecurity. They contend that raising the threshold and ensuring automatic updates will restore the original intent of the FLSA, boost workers' purchasing power, reduce income inequality, and encourage employers to either pay overtime or hire more staff.

Opponents contend

Opponents typically argue that significantly raising the overtime threshold imposes substantial new labor costs on businesses, particularly small businesses and non-profits, which could lead to job losses, reduced benefits, or increased prices for consumers. They may also contend that it reduces flexibility for both employers and employees, and that automatic updates remove necessary regulatory flexibility and could lead to unpredictable economic burdens.

The bill is concise and its core provisions are clearly stated, making it accessible for a quick but informed review.

Section 2(a)(2), adding subsection (k)(2)(A) to 29 U.S.C. 213.

Establishes New Minimum Salary Thresholds for Overtime Exemption

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision sets a new minimum salary an employee must earn to be considered exempt from overtime pay under the FLSA's executive, administrative, and professional (EAP) exemptions. It phases in increases: $45,000 (2026), $55,000 (2027), $65,000 (2028), and $75,000 (2029). This means employees earning below these thresholds, regardless of their job duties, would become eligible for overtime pay.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupSalaried workers currently earning between the existing federal threshold (currently $35,568) and the new proposed thresholds.ImpactWill become eligible for overtime pay for hours worked over 40 in a week, or their salaries will be raised to meet the new threshold.MechanismDirect amendment to FLSA exemption criteria.ScaleMillions of workers nationwide.
GroupEmployers of salaried workers.ImpactIncreased labor costs due to overtime pay or salary increases, or potential restructuring of workforce/job duties.MechanismCompliance with new FLSA requirements.ScaleBroad impact across industries, particularly those with many salaried employees near the current threshold.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision will restore overtime protections to millions of workers who have been excluded due to an outdated salary threshold, ensuring fair compensation for long hours and boosting economic security for middle-class families.

Critics contend

Opponents contend that these significant increases will impose substantial new costs on businesses, forcing them to reduce staff, cut benefits, or pass costs on to consumers, potentially harming economic growth.

Tradeoffs

Balances worker compensation and protection against business costs and operational flexibility.

Section 2(a)(2), adding subsection (k)(2)(A)(v) and (k)(2)(C) to 29 U.S.C. 213.

Mandates Automatic Annual Updates to Overtime Salary Threshold

prominently featuredmoderately complex

Beginning January 1, 2030, the bill requires the salary threshold to be automatically updated annually. The update mechanism ties the threshold to the 55th percentile of weekly earnings for full-time salaried workers nationally, based on Bureau of Labor Statistics data from the second quarter of the preceding year. These updates will occur without requiring new rulemaking.

Section 3, amending Section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA (29 U.S.C. 213).

Establishes a 20% Limit on Non-Exempt Duties for EAP Employees

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This provision amends the FLSA to specify that an employee cannot be considered exempt from overtime if they spend 20% or more of their work time on activities not directly or closely related to executive or administrative duties. This effectively reinstates and clarifies a "duties test" component, making it harder for employers to classify employees as exempt if they perform a significant amount of non-managerial or non-professional tasks.

FOUND

States that Section 553 of title 5, United States Code (which governs notice and comment rulemaking for federal agencies) shall not apply to the annual updates of the salary threshold.

Section 2(a)(2), adding subsection (k)(2)(C)(ii) to 29 U.S.C. 213.

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to streamline administrative processes for formulaic updates, preventing delays and potential political interference in routine adjustments.

Case for: Proponents argue this ensures the automatic updates are truly automatic and not subject to political delays or challenges that could undermine the consistency of overtime protections.

Case against: Opponents might argue that removing notice and comment rulemaking limits public and stakeholder input on significant economic adjustments, even if formulaic, potentially leading to unintended consequences without proper review.

Estimated impact: Ensures the long-term stability and predictability of the automatic update mechanism, affecting millions of workers and employers over time.

FOUND

Requires the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to publish weekly earnings data for full-time salaried workers by census region within 21 days after the end of each calendar quarter.

Section 2(b)

Why it matters:This is a necessary supporting mechanism for the automatic updates, ensuring the data required for calculation is publicly available and timely. It's not intended to be a primary policy driver but an essential operational component.

Case for: Proponents argue this ensures transparency and provides the necessary data infrastructure for the automatic salary threshold updates, making the process verifiable and consistent.

Case against: No specific opposition is typically raised against data publication requirements, though some might argue about the administrative cost or burden on BLS, or the granularity of data.

Estimated impact: Facilitates the accurate and timely implementation of the automatic overtime threshold updates, affecting millions of workers and employers.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this