The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 8870·119th Congress·Introduced May 19, 2026

BUILD America 250 Act

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksOmnibus
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Graves, Sam [R-MO-6]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
May 22, 2026

Bottom line

This comprehensive bill reauthorizes and significantly reforms federal surface transportation programs, introducing new funding mechanisms and policy directives across multiple modes of transport.

What it actually does

This bill, the 'BUILD America 250 Act,' reauthorizes and modifies funding for a wide range of surface transportation programs, including federal-aid highways, bridges, public transit, highway safety, motor carriers, and railroads, for fiscal years 2027 through 2031. It introduces new grant programs, streamlines environmental reviews, and establishes new policies for autonomous commercial vehicles, cargo theft prevention, and rail safety. The bill also includes provisions for a new motor vehicle registration fee and significant reforms to Amtrak's operations and financial reporting.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that the bill is essential for modernizing America's aging infrastructure, enhancing safety across all transportation modes, and improving efficiency in freight and passenger movement. They contend that streamlining environmental reviews will accelerate project delivery, while new grant programs will address critical needs in rural and urban areas. The bill's focus on new technologies and workforce development is also highlighted as crucial for future economic competitiveness.

Opponents contend

Critics may argue that the bill's extensive scope and numerous new programs could lead to increased federal spending and potential inefficiencies. Concerns might be raised about the new motor vehicle registration fee, which could disproportionately affect certain vehicle owners. Opponents might also question the effectiveness of some proposed reforms, particularly those related to environmental streamlining, suggesting they could weaken protections, or those related to autonomous vehicles, citing potential safety risks.

This is a very long and complex bill, typical of an omnibus reauthorization. An informed reader would require several hours to thoroughly review its provisions, which is a significant time commitment for public scrutiny.

Sec. 1101, Title I, Subtitle A

Authorization of Appropriations for Federal-Aid Highways

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes significant appropriations from the Highway Trust Fund for federal-aid highway programs, including the National Highway Performance Program, Surface Transportation Block Grant Program, Highway Safety Improvement Program, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program. It specifies annual funding levels for fiscal years 2027 through 2031, totaling tens of billions of dollars each year. It also authorizes funds for the TIFIA program, bridge programs, and federal lands and tribal transportation programs.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupState Departments of TransportationImpactReceive substantial federal funding for highway and bridge projects.MechanismFormula and competitive grants.ScaleBillions of dollars annually.
GroupCommuters and TravelersImpactBenefit from improved roads, bridges, and reduced congestion.MechanismInfrastructure investments.ScaleWidespread, national.
GroupConstruction IndustryImpactIncreased demand for construction services and materials.MechanismFederal contracts and projects.ScaleSignificant economic activity.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue these authorizations are critical to maintaining and improving the nation's highway infrastructure, which is vital for economic growth, safety, and efficient movement of goods and people.

Critics contend

Critics may argue that such large authorizations contribute to federal debt if not offset by sufficient revenue, or that the allocation formulas may not adequately address specific state or regional needs.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between the need for robust infrastructure investment and concerns about fiscal responsibility and equitable distribution of funds across states and programs.

Sec. 1108, Title I, Subtitle A

Grants for Rebuilding America's Vital Engineering Structures Program

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section renames and reforms the bridge program, establishing a 'Grants for Rebuilding America's Vital Engineering Structures Program.' It provides formula grants to states for new bridge construction and improvements, with specific set-asides for off-system and locally-owned bridges. It also creates a competitive 'Bridge Completion Program' for nationally significant bridges on the National Highway System, with grants of at least $50 million and a 50% federal share.

Sec. 1129, Title I, Subtitle A

Registration Fee on Motor Vehicles

buried in fine printmoderately complex

This section establishes a new annual federal registration fee for covered electric vehicles ($130) and covered plug-in hybrid vehicles ($35), starting in fiscal year 2027. States are required to collect and remit these fees, with a penalty of 125% withholding from federal highway funds for non-compliance. The fees are adjusted biennially by $5, capped at $150 and $50 respectively, and terminate on October 1, 2036. States can retain 1% for administrative expenses.

Sec. 1203, Title I, Subtitle B

Efficient Environmental Reviews and One Federal Decision

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section streamlines environmental review processes for transportation projects. It mandates lead agencies to define project purpose and need within 45 days and sets target completion times for environmental impact statements (2 years) and environmental assessments (1 year) for major projects. It also limits the length of environmental documents to 150 pages for EIS (300 for complex) and 75 pages for EAs, and requires biennial reviews of agency performance in environmental reviews.

Sec. 3006, Title III, Subtitle A

Consolidated State Block Grant Program for Public Transportation

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section establishes a new consolidated State block grant program for public transportation. It allows states to consolidate various federal transit grant amounts (e.g., for seniors/disabled, rural areas, state of good repair, buses/facilities) into a single block grant, excluding funds for large primary urbanized areas where the state is not the direct recipient. States must apply, demonstrate administrative capacity, and ensure equitable allocation to rural and urban areas. Designated recipients can opt out, but non-participation results in a 3-fiscal-year exclusion.

Sec. 3007, Title III, Subtitle A

Fixed Guideway Capital Investment Grants Program Reforms

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section renames 'Small Start' projects to 'Streamlined Start' projects and adjusts their cost thresholds. It also refines the definition of 'Core Capacity Improvement Projects' to focus on increasing corridor capacity by at least 10% or substantially system-wide. The bill introduces an expedited technical capacity review process for experienced applicants and allows for an adjustment to the economic development criterion rating for projects that promote housing development near transit facilities. It also allows alternative project delivery methods.

Sec. 3012, Title III, Subtitle A

Crime Prevention and Security in Public Transportation

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section expands eligible expenses for crime prevention and security projects under urbanized area formula grants, including lighting, camera surveillance, emergency telephones, farebox improvements, cybersecurity, and technology to combat crime. It also allows up to 1.5% of funds for operating costs related to fare enforcement, hiring transit officers, or contracting with local police. A new mandate requires states/local governments to make fare evasion a criminal or civil offense, with a 10% federal funding withholding penalty for non-compliance.

Sec. 5402, Title V, Subtitle E

ADS-Equipped Commercial Motor Vehicle Interstate Operation Safety Standard

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section mandates the Secretary to establish a performance-based safety standard for Autonomous Driving System (ADS)-equipped commercial motor vehicles operating in interstate commerce within two years. Manufacturers must certify compliance through a 'safety case' detailing hardware, software, operational design domain (ODD), cybersecurity, and safety management systems. It also sets incident reporting requirements and defines roles and responsibilities, requiring a human operator in the vehicle for certain integrated service operations (e.g., school buses, placarded hazardous materials).

Sec. 10101, Title X, Subtitle A

Grants to Amtrak for Northeast Corridor and National Network

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section authorizes significant appropriations for grants to Amtrak for activities on both the Northeast Corridor and the National Network for fiscal years 2027 through 2031. It allocates separate funding streams for each, totaling billions annually. It also allows the Secretary to withhold up to 1% for oversight costs, and specific amounts for the State-Supported Route Committee and the Northeast Corridor Commission. A $100 million annual set-aside is included for Amtrak accessibility upgrades until all facilities are compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Sec. 10104, Title X, Subtitle A

Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) Grants

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section amends the CRISI grant program, expanding eligible recipients to include institutions of higher education and law enforcement agencies, and adding 'a lessee of a federally-owned transportation hub.' It broadens eligible projects to include those facilitating intercity passenger rail ridership growth or improving freight movement by reducing rail congestion. It also explicitly allows funding for advanced rail safety technologies like wayside defect detection. A new provision allows the Secretary to waive the non-Federal cost share for certain safety-related projects and removes the cost-benefit analysis requirement for specific project types.

Sec. 10420, Title X, Subtitle D

Confidential Close Call Reporting System (C3RS) for Class I Freight Railroads

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section mandates the Secretary to initiate a rulemaking to establish a confidential close call reporting system (C3RS) for Class I freight railroads. It requires railroads to enter into a memorandum of understanding with employees to participate in the program, allowing employees to confidentially report safety 'close call' events to an independent third party. Employees who report are protected from railroad discipline, certification revocation, and FRA civil enforcement, provided certain conditions are met. The system aims to identify and mitigate safety risks without fear of reprisal.

Sec. 10611, Title X, Subtitle F

Safer Tank Cars for Flammable Liquids (Phase-out Schedule)

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section mandates that, beginning December 31, 2028, no railroad tank car, regardless of its construction date, may be used to transport Class 3 flammable liquid in packing groups II or III (with specific exceptions) unless it meets or exceeds DOT-117, DOT-117P, or DOT-117R specification requirements. The Secretary is required to revise existing regulations to conform to this new phase-out date and may delay the date to May 1, 2029, if a GAO report indicates insufficient manufacturing capacity or significant impacts to interstate commerce.

Sec. 10612, Title X, Subtitle F

Requirements for Safe Transport of Lithium-Ion Batteries

mentioned in summaryhighly complex

This section mandates the Secretary to revise international and domestic regulations for the safe transport of lithium-ion batteries. It requires developing an impact test for UN 3536 batteries, mandating that UN 3480 cells/batteries be offered for transport at no more than 30% state of charge (unless approved otherwise), and issuing guidance on packaging, movement, and disposal of damaged/defective/recalled lithium-ion cells/batteries. These regulations are to be reviewed and updated every 5 years.

Sec. 1301, Title I, Subtitle C

Transportation Rulemaking Committees

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section amends Title 49 to exempt 'transportation rulemaking committees' designated by the Secretary or a modal administration from Chapter 10 of Title 5 (Federal Advisory Committee Act). It directs the Secretary to adopt procedures similar to aviation rulemaking committees, allowing for multiple industry co-chairs and ensuring non-federal stakeholders can serve. It also requires transparency for committee reports and recommendations before rulemaking and mandates that any resulting rulemaking be promulgated via a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

Sec. 1102, Title I, Subtitle A

Obligation Limitation for Federal-Aid Highway and Highway Safety Construction Programs

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section sets annual obligation limitations for federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs for fiscal years 2027 through 2031, ranging from $72.27 billion to $76.996 billion. It specifies certain programs that are exempt from these limitations (e.g., emergency relief) and outlines the methodology for distributing the obligation authority among states and programs. It also includes provisions for redistribution of unused authority after August 1 of each fiscal year, prioritizing states with large unobligated balances in bridge programs.

Sec. 4002, Title IV, Subtitle A

Consolidation and Enhancement of Highway Safety Programs

prominently featuredhighly complex

This section consolidates the previous National Priority Safety Programs (Section 405) into the Highway Safety Programs (Section 402). It mandates that states with higher-than-average fatality rates in specific areas (occupant protection, impaired driving, motorcyclist safety, speeding, nonmotorist safety) must expend a minimum percentage of their Section 402 funds on programs addressing those national priority safety initiatives. It also expands eligible activities under Section 402, including digital alert technology, roadside safety, and improved state safety data systems.

Sec. 5101, Title V, Subtitle B

Predatory Commercial Motor Vehicle Lease-Purchase Agreement Programs Oversight

buried in fine printmoderately complex

This section requires motor carriers using lease-purchase agreements for vehicles not owned by them to provide a disclosure form to drivers, detailing weekly compensation, mileage, driver retention rates, and average deductions. It also authorizes a public awareness campaign on predatory lease-purchase programs and mandates the Secretary to issue regulations within two years to prohibit the use of such predatory programs by motor carriers.

Sec. 5102, Title V, Subtitle B

Restroom Access for Drivers

buried in fine printstraightforward

This section mandates that commercial motor vehicle operators must be granted access to any covered restroom facility at covered establishments where they deliver goods or are waiting for cargo. A 'covered establishment' includes businesses open to the public or receiving/sending goods by CMV, but excludes small structures (800 sq ft or less) with employee-only restrooms. It also requires terminal operators to provide sufficient covered restrooms for drayage truck operators in accessible areas of the terminal.

Sec. 10206, Title X, Subtitle B

Baby Changing Table Requirements on Amtrak Trains

buried in fine printstraightforward

This section mandates that each newly purchased Amtrak passenger rail train (defined as 'covered passenger rail train') must have a baby changing table in at least one restroom in each car, including in an ADA-compliant restroom. It also requires clear signage indicating the presence and location of these tables.

Sec. 10502, Title X, Subtitle E

Categorical Exclusions for Rail Projects in Existing Operational Rights-of-Way

buried in fine printmoderately complex

This section directs the Secretary to amend federal regulations to add 'covered projects' as a categorical exclusion from environmental review. A 'covered project' is a rail project (e.g., capital, operations, safety improvements) located entirely within an existing operational right-of-way of a covered railroad facility, and either in a State rail plan or granted a waiver if the plan is outdated. This aims to streamline environmental reviews for routine rail infrastructure work.

FOUND

These subsections introduce 'Automatic Execution of Conforming Changes' for covered highways and transportation laws. When an amendment adds, repeals, or changes a section, the table of contents or similar tabular entries are automatically updated to conform, unless explicitly exempted or amended at the same time.

Sec. 4, Subsections (a) and (b)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to ensure consistency in statutory text, but its placement early in the bill and technical nature could obscure its function for a casual reader.

Case for: Proponents would argue this streamlines the legislative drafting process, reduces the risk of errors or inconsistencies in statutory tables of contents, and makes the U.S. Code easier to maintain and navigate for legal professionals.

Case against: No specific opposition is typically raised against this type of technical, procedural provision, as it is generally seen as a beneficial administrative improvement.

Estimated impact: Reduces legislative drafting and codification workload for technical corrections, improving the accuracy and consistency of the U.S. Code.

FOUND

This provision grants the Secretary limited waiver authority to increase the federal share for nationally significant multimodal freight and highway projects to up to 100% for non-construction costs (planning, environmental review, permitting) if the project lacks final environmental decisions or permits, and requiring the non-Federal share would increase risk of delay. This authority is limited to 5 projects per fiscal year, with a maximum of $30 million per project for these costs, and sunsets on October 1, 2031.

Sec. 1105(q)(7), Title I, Subtitle A

Why it matters:This is a targeted flexibility designed to address a specific bottleneck in project delivery (pre-construction financing risk). Its detailed conditions are typical of such targeted authorities.

Case for: Proponents would argue this accelerates critical infrastructure projects by allowing federal funds to cover upfront, high-risk costs that often deter private or non-federal investment, thereby reducing overall project delays and costs. It's a strategic tool to get projects 'shovel-ready.'

Case against: Critics might argue that allowing 100% federal share, even for pre-construction costs, reduces the incentive for non-federal partners to commit early, potentially shifting more financial risk to the federal government. The 'unreasonable project delay or project nondelivery' criteria could be subjective.

Estimated impact: Potentially accelerates up to 5 major projects annually by covering up to $30 million in pre-construction costs, reducing financial risk for project sponsors.

FOUND

This section establishes a new annual federal registration fee for covered electric vehicles ($130) and covered plug-in hybrid vehicles ($35), starting in fiscal year 2027. States are required to collect and remit these fees, with a penalty of 125% withholding from federal highway funds for non-compliance. The fees are adjusted biennially by $5, capped at $150 and $50 respectively, and terminate on October 1, 2036. States can retain 1% for administrative expenses.

Sec. 1129, Title I, Subtitle A

Why it matters:This is a significant new revenue-generating policy that could be politically sensitive. Placing it within a large reauthorization bill, rather than as standalone tax legislation, might reduce individual scrutiny.

Case for: Proponents argue this fee addresses the 'user-pays' principle of the Highway Trust Fund, as electric and hybrid vehicle owners contribute less through fuel taxes. It ensures these vehicles contribute their fair share to road maintenance, which they also utilize.

Case against: Critics contend this fee could disincentivize the adoption of electric vehicles, which are crucial for environmental goals. They may also argue it's an additional burden on consumers and that states might face significant administrative challenges in implementation.

Estimated impact: Generates new federal revenue for the Highway Trust Fund, potentially hundreds of millions to billions over its lifespan, while imposing a new annual cost on EV and PHEV owners.

FOUND

This subsection mandates that beginning in FY2028, the Secretary shall withhold 10% of urbanized area formula grant assistance from direct recipients if the relevant state or local government does not make fare evasion a criminal or civil offense. It includes provisions to ensure withholding doesn't adversely affect compliant jurisdictions in multi-jurisdictional areas.

Sec. 3012(e), Title III, Subtitle A

Why it matters:This is a policy directive that impacts state/local legal systems, which can be politically sensitive. Embedding it as a condition for federal funding within a larger reauthorization bill is a common way to advance such policies.

Case for: Proponents argue that fare evasion is a significant problem for transit agencies, leading to revenue loss and contributing to a perception of disorder that can deter ridership. Mandating penalties ensures transit systems have the tools to address this issue and maintain financial viability.

Case against: Critics contend that criminalizing or civilly penalizing fare evasion disproportionately impacts low-income individuals and communities of color, potentially leading to increased interactions with law enforcement for minor offenses. They may argue it's federal overreach into local criminal justice policy.

Estimated impact: Could lead to widespread changes in state and local laws regarding fare evasion, potentially affecting millions of transit riders and local law enforcement budgets. Could result in withholding of millions of dollars in federal transit funds from non-compliant jurisdictions.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
  • Riders
  • Tactical maneuvers
  • Process critique
  • Transparency
Ask Ledger AI about this