The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9138·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 4, 2026

To require the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to the Secretary of the Navy administrative jurisdiction of certain land located on Adak Island, Alaska, and for other purposes.

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Begich, Nicholas J. [R-AK-At Large]
Committees
Armed Services Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 4, 2026

Bottom line

This bill facilitates military expansion and operational flexibility on Adak Island by reallocating federally owned land from conservation to defense use.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the Secretary of the Interior to transfer approximately 5,624 acres of land on Adak Island, Alaska, from the National Wildlife Refuge System to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. This land, currently part of the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge, would then be used for defense-related purposes, including armament testing, military training, and equipment development, while being explicitly removed from all laws pertaining to the National Wildlife Refuge System.

Proponents argue

Proponents would argue that this transfer is crucial for national security, enabling the Navy to conduct essential high-hazard explosives testing, advanced military training, and equipment development in a strategically important location. They would emphasize the need for dedicated sites for such activities to maintain military readiness and technological superiority, asserting that the specific land parcel is vital for these defense objectives.

Opponents contend

Opponents would contend that transferring land from a National Wildlife Refuge sets a dangerous precedent, undermining conservation efforts and potentially harming sensitive ecosystems and wildlife on Adak Island. They would argue that alternative sites for military activities should be explored to protect designated natural preserves, and that the environmental impact of high-hazard explosives and extensive training could be significant and irreversible.

The bill is concise and its core provisions are easily understandable, allowing for quick comprehension by an informed reader.

Section 1(a)

Mandated Land Transfer to Navy

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the Secretary of the Interior to promptly transfer administrative control of approximately 5,624 acres on Adak Island, Alaska, to the Secretary of the Navy. This means the land will shift from being managed by the Interior Department, likely for conservation, to being managed by the Navy for military purposes, streamlining its use for defense operations.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDepartment of the Interior (specifically U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)ImpactLoss of administrative jurisdiction over 5,624 acres of federal land.MechanismStatutory mandate for transfer of administrative jurisdiction.ScaleDirect administrative change for a specific land parcel.
GroupDepartment of the NavyImpactGain of administrative jurisdiction over 5,624 acres, providing dedicated space for military operations.MechanismStatutory mandate for transfer of administrative jurisdiction.ScaleDirect administrative change for a specific land parcel.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this transfer is a necessary administrative step to consolidate control of the land under the Navy, streamlining its ability to utilize the site for critical defense operations without inter-agency jurisdictional hurdles.

Critics contend

Opponents might argue that this transfer bypasses established land management review processes, potentially reducing transparency and public input regarding the future use of federally owned land.

Tradeoffs

The tension lies between efficient military land management and the established processes for federal land transfers and inter-agency coordination, particularly when involving protected areas.

Section 1(b)

Permitted Defense-Related Uses

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section explicitly outlines the types of activities the Secretary of the Navy is authorized to conduct on the transferred land. These include using it as a testing site for high-hazard explosives, various forms of aerial gunnery, rocketry, electronic warfare, tactical maneuvering, and air support training, equipment and tactics development, and other defense-related purposes deemed appropriate by the Navy Secretary.

Section 1(c)

Refuge System Exclusion and Boundary Adjustment

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section explicitly removes the 5,624 acres of covered land from the National Wildlife Refuge System, specifically stating it will no longer be considered part of the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge. It also mandates that the Secretary of the Interior adjust the refuge boundaries accordingly, and clarifies that the land will no longer be subject to any laws governing the refuge system, effective upon transfer.

FOUND

Defines "covered land" as approximately 5,624 acres on Adak Island, Alaska, specifically described in Public Land Order No. 7609 titled "Partial Revocation of Public Land Order No. 1949; Alaska" (69 Fed. Reg. 48252; August 9, 2004).

Section 1(e)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to avoid reprinting lengthy technical descriptions of land parcels already defined in public records. It ensures precision without cluttering the bill text.

Case for: Referencing existing public land orders is an efficient and precise way to define land parcels, avoiding errors that could arise from re-transcribing complex legal descriptions.

Case against: A casual reader might not realize the need to look up the referenced Public Land Order, potentially leading to an incomplete understanding of the exact land parcel being transferred and its specific ecological characteristics.

Estimated impact: This provision precisely defines the 5,624-acre parcel subject to the transfer and removal from refuge status, which is central to the bill's operative effect.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this