The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9216·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 9, 2026

Double the Wage for Overtime Act of 2026

IntroducedLabor and EmploymentMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Casar, Greg [D-TX-35]
Committees
Education and Workforce Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 9, 2026

Bottom line

This bill significantly increases the premium rate for overtime hours, which would substantially raise labor costs for employers requiring overtime and potentially boost earnings for employees working extended hours.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) to increase the mandatory overtime pay rate for employees from one and one-half times their regular rate of pay to two times their regular rate. This change applies broadly to most employees covered by FLSA and specifically to certain exempted categories where overtime is currently paid at 1.5x, with an effective date 180 days after enactment.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill would provide a substantial pay raise for millions of workers, especially those in essential services who often work long hours, thereby improving living standards and recognizing the value of their labor. They contend it would also incentivize employers to hire more staff rather than relying on extensive overtime, potentially creating jobs and reducing worker burnout.

Opponents contend

Opponents would likely argue that this significant increase in overtime costs would place an undue financial burden on businesses, particularly small businesses, potentially leading to reduced hiring, cuts in employee benefits, or a decrease in overall hours offered to avoid the higher premium. They might also contend it could lead to price increases for consumers.

The bill text is exceptionally short and clear, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its core purpose quickly.

Section 2(a)

Increase Overtime Pay Rate to Double the Regular Rate

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) to mandate that employers pay employees at a rate of two times their regular rate of pay for all hours worked beyond the standard 40-hour workweek. Currently, the FLSA requires overtime to be paid at one and one-half times the regular rate. The bill makes this change universally across the general overtime provisions and in specific sections relating to certain exemptions, ensuring a consistent doubling of the premium.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupEmployees who work overtimeImpactIncreased earnings for overtime hoursMechanismStatutory increase in the overtime pay multiplier from 1.5x to 2x.ScalePotentially millions of workers across various industries.
GroupEmployers who require overtime workImpactIncreased labor costsMechanismStatutory increase in the overtime pay multiplier from 1.5x to 2x.ScaleAffects all businesses that employ workers covered by FLSA and utilize overtime.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that this increase is a necessary update to a decades-old standard, providing a more meaningful premium for workers' extra labor and reflecting the increased cost of living. They believe it will enhance worker welfare and potentially stimulate the economy through increased consumer spending.

Critics contend

Opponents would contend that this substantial increase in the overtime premium would significantly raise operational costs for businesses, potentially forcing them to reduce staff, cut hours, or pass costs onto consumers through higher prices, ultimately harming economic competitiveness and job growth.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the goal of increasing worker compensation and potentially incentivizing new hires against the concern of imposing higher labor costs on businesses, which could lead to reduced overtime availability or other cost-cutting measures.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this