The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9238·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 10, 2026

To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.

Failed HouseArmed Forces and National SecuritySubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Crawford, Eric A. "Rick" [R-AR-1]
Committees
Intelligence (Permanent Select) Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 11, 2026

Bottom line

This bill provides a brief, 20-day extension of critical foreign intelligence surveillance authorities under FISA Title VII, preventing their immediate lapse and allowing for further congressional deliberation.

What it actually does

This bill enacts a temporary, 20-day extension of the authorities under Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978, which includes Section 702. It amends the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to shift the sunset date for these authorities from June 12, 2026, to July 2, 2026, preventing their immediate expiration.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this short extension is essential to prevent a dangerous lapse in vital national security intelligence collection capabilities, which are crucial for monitoring foreign adversaries and preventing terrorist attacks. They contend that it provides Congress with necessary additional time to debate and pass a more comprehensive reauthorization or reform package without jeopardizing ongoing intelligence operations.

Opponents contend

Opponents may argue that even a brief extension without substantive reforms perpetuates authorities they view as problematic for civil liberties and privacy. They might contend that Congress should use the looming expiration deadline to force meaningful changes to Section 702, particularly concerning the potential for surveillance of U.S. persons and the need for greater transparency and oversight.

The bill is exceptionally short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for any reader to quickly understand its direct impact and purpose.

Section 1(a)

Extension of FISA Title VII Authorities

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to change the expiration date for the authorities granted under Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. Specifically, it extends the sunset date for these powers, which include Section 702, from June 12, 2026, to July 2, 2026. This action ensures that these foreign intelligence collection capabilities remain active for an additional 20 days.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. Intelligence Community (e.g., NSA, FBI)ImpactContinuation of authority to conduct foreign intelligence surveillance under Section 702 without interruption.MechanismAmends the statutory sunset date, allowing existing operations to proceed.ScaleEnsures uninterrupted operation of a critical foreign intelligence program for a limited period.
GroupIndividuals subject to foreign intelligence surveillance (non-U.S. persons abroad)ImpactContinued potential for their communications to be collected under existing legal frameworks.MechanismThe legal basis for collection remains in place.ScaleDirect impact on those targeted by foreign intelligence collection.
GroupU.S. persons whose communications may be incidentally collectedImpactContinued potential for incidental collection, subject to existing minimization procedures and querying rules.MechanismThe legal framework governing incidental collection and data access remains unchanged.ScaleIndirect impact on a broad population, maintaining the status quo regarding privacy concerns.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this extension is absolutely necessary to prevent a dangerous lapse in critical foreign intelligence collection capabilities, which are vital for national security against terrorist threats and foreign adversaries. They contend that a short extension provides Congress with necessary time to deliberate on a more comprehensive reauthorization without jeopardizing ongoing operations.

Critics contend

Critics argue that even a temporary extension without reforms misses an opportunity to address long-standing concerns about civil liberties, privacy, and the potential for abuse of Section 702 authorities, particularly regarding the querying of U.S. person data. They might contend that Congress should use the looming deadline to force meaningful reforms.

Tradeoffs

This provision navigates the tension between maintaining continuous foreign intelligence collection capabilities deemed vital for national security and addressing concerns about civil liberties and privacy associated with Section 702, opting for a temporary continuation to allow for further debate.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this