The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9308·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 11, 2026

Tax Relief for First Responder Beneficiaries Act

IntroducedTaxationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 11, 2026

Bottom line

This bill broadens the scope of individuals eligible for tax-free death benefits and survivor annuities for fallen public safety officers, aiming to provide greater financial relief to a wider range of those designated by the officer.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the categories of individuals eligible for tax-exempt death benefits and survivor annuities related to public safety officers. It changes the term "surviving dependents" to "surviving beneficiaries" for certain tax exclusions and broadens eligibility for survivor annuities beyond "a child of such officer" to include "a child or a beneficiary of any life insurance policy or benefit plan of such officer." These changes are applied retroactively to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill provides essential and overdue tax relief to the families and designated beneficiaries of public safety officers who die in the line of duty. They contend that current law is too restrictive, failing to recognize modern family structures or the explicit wishes of officers regarding their beneficiaries. Expanding eligibility ensures that the financial support intended for these heroes' loved ones is not diminished by taxes, honoring their sacrifice more fully.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that while the intent is noble, expanding tax exclusions could lead to unforeseen revenue losses, especially if "beneficiary" is interpreted broadly. They might also raise concerns about potential complexities in administering these expanded definitions or ensuring that the benefits are directed as originally intended for immediate family support, rather than potentially more distant designees. However, direct opposition to benefits for fallen officers' families is rare.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for a quick read and understanding of its direct effects.

Section 2(a)

Broadening Tax Exclusion for Death Benefits

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends Section 104(a)(6)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code to change the term "surviving dependents" to "surviving beneficiaries." This means that death benefits paid to public safety officers' beneficiaries will be excluded from gross income for tax purposes, regardless of whether they are legally defined as dependents, thereby expanding the pool of individuals who can receive these benefits tax-free.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupBeneficiaries of fallen public safety officers (e.g., spouses, children, domestic partners, designated individuals)ImpactFinancial relief; they will receive death benefits without federal income tax liability.MechanismAmends the Internal Revenue Code to broaden the definition of eligible recipients for tax-exempt benefits.ScaleAffects all beneficiaries of eligible public safety officers who die in the line of duty after the effective date.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this change aligns the tax code with the intent to fully support those designated by fallen officers, recognizing that "dependents" may not encompass all individuals an officer wished to provide for, such as domestic partners or other chosen beneficiaries.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against provisions that expand benefits for fallen public safety officers' families. Potential concerns, if any, would likely revolve around the scope of "beneficiaries" and potential revenue implications.

Tradeoffs

The primary tradeoff is between providing comprehensive support to a fallen officer's chosen beneficiaries and the potential, albeit likely small, impact on federal tax revenue from expanding the exclusion.

Section 3(a)

Broadening Tax Exclusion for Survivor Annuities

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends Section 101(h)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code to expand the eligibility for tax-exempt survivor annuity benefits. It changes "a child of such officer" to "a child or a beneficiary of any life insurance policy or benefit plan of such officer." This ensures that survivor annuities paid to a broader range of designated beneficiaries, not just children, are also excluded from gross income.

Section 2(b) and Section 3(b)

Retroactive Application of Tax Relief

mentioned in summarystraightforward

Both key amendments in the bill are made retroactive, applying to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022. This means that beneficiaries who received death benefits or survivor annuities in 2023, 2024, or 2025 (if the bill passes in 2026) and would have been taxed under previous law but are now covered by the expanded definitions, may be eligible for refunds or adjustments.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this