The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9314·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 15, 2026

DHS Surveillance Technology Moratorium Act of 2026

IntroducedImmigrationMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Goldman, Daniel S. [D-NY-10]
Committees
Homeland Security Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 7, 2026

Bottom line

This bill aims to increase transparency and accountability regarding DHS's use of surveillance technologies by pausing new acquisitions and mandating public audits and reports.

What it actually does

This bill enacts a moratorium on new or expanded Department of Homeland Security (DHS) contracts for surveillance and data analytics technologies used to identify, locate, track individuals, or support immigration enforcement operations. The moratorium remains in effect until a comprehensive audit by the DHS Inspector General, a public report on these technologies, and a subsequent report to Congress on implemented safeguards are completed.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that the bill is essential for protecting privacy and civil liberties, especially for vulnerable populations, by bringing much-needed oversight to DHS's expansive use of surveillance and data analytics. They contend that current practices lack transparency, potentially leading to misuse of data and discriminatory targeting, and that a moratorium is necessary to establish proper safeguards.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that the moratorium could hinder DHS's ability to effectively carry out its national security and border protection missions by delaying access to critical technologies. They may contend that existing oversight mechanisms are sufficient or that the bill's requirements are overly burdensome and could create operational gaps, potentially compromising public safety or national security.

The bill is relatively short and clearly structured, making it accessible for an informed reader to understand its core provisions within a short timeframe.

Section 3

Moratorium on DHS Surveillance Technology Contracts

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section prohibits the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from awarding new contracts, renewing or extending existing ones, exercising options, or expanding/modifying contracts related to surveillance and data analytics technologies used for tracking individuals or supporting immigration enforcement. This pause remains in effect until a comprehensive audit and reporting requirements are fulfilled.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) components (ICE, CBP, USCIS, Office of Intelligence and Analysis)ImpactOperational restriction; cannot acquire or expand certain surveillance technologies.MechanismLegal prohibition on fund obligation/expenditure.ScaleDepartment-wide for specified contract types.
GroupContractors providing surveillance technologiesImpactBusiness disruption; inability to secure new contracts or extend existing ones.MechanismLoss of potential revenue from DHS.ScalePotentially significant for companies specializing in these technologies.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this moratorium is crucial to prevent the unchecked expansion of surveillance capabilities by DHS, ensuring that privacy and civil liberties concerns are addressed before further deployment of potentially intrusive technologies.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that this moratorium could impede DHS's operational effectiveness, particularly in rapidly evolving threat landscapes, by preventing the agency from updating or acquiring necessary tools to secure borders or enforce immigration laws.

Tradeoffs

Balances the need for government agencies to utilize advanced technologies for security and enforcement against the imperative to protect individual privacy and civil liberties from potential overreach.

Section 3(d)

National Security and Public Safety Waiver

mentioned in summarystraightforward

The Secretary of Homeland Security can waive the moratorium on a case-by-case basis if a covered contract is deemed necessary to address an imminent act of violence, a specific threat to life or public safety, or a specific national security threat. Any such waiver requires a detailed written justification to Congress within seven days.

Section 4

Comprehensive Audit of DHS Surveillance Technologies

prominently featuredmoderately complex

Within 180 days of enactment, the DHS Inspector General, in collaboration with the DHS Privacy Office and Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, must conduct a thorough audit of all covered surveillance technologies. This audit must examine data collection practices, use of facial recognition, commercial data brokers, data retention, contractor access, privacy/civil liberties impacts, use in protest/assembly, immigration enforcement, accuracy of predictive systems, and compliance with federal laws.

Section 5

Public Transparency Report on Surveillance Technologies

prominently featuredstraightforward

Within 60 days of the audit's completion, the Secretary of Homeland Security must publish an unclassified, publicly available report. This report must list all covered surveillance technologies, their contractors, capabilities, privacy/civil liberties impact assessments, data sources, data retention/sharing/deletion policies, and information sharing agreements with other entities. Redactions are limited to specific national security harm and require justification and IG review.

Section 6

Requirements for Lifting the Moratorium

prominently featuredmoderately complex

The moratorium on covered contracts will only terminate after three conditions are met: the completion of the required audit, the publication of the public report, and the elapse of 90 days after the Secretary provides Congress with a report detailing implemented safeguards, legal authorities, and internal policies governing surveillance technologies.

Section 7

Ongoing Annual Reporting on Surveillance Technologies

mentioned in summarystraightforward

After the moratorium is lifted, the Secretary must submit an annual unclassified report to Congress and publish it publicly. This report will include a current list of technologies and contractors, information on new contracts, changes to data policies, summaries of privacy/civil liberties incidents, details on any waivers issued, and an assessment of ongoing compliance with protections.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this