The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9369·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 18, 2026

GHOSTRUCK Act

IntroducedTransportation and Public WorksSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Steube, W. Gregory [R-FL-17]
Committees
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 18, 2026

Bottom line

The GHOSTRUCK Act allows motor carrier personnel to initiate edits or annotations on ELD records, provided the driver ultimately approves the changes, aiming to streamline record-keeping processes.

What it actually does

This bill amends federal law to permit employees or authorized agents of a motor carrier to edit or annotate electronic logging device (ELD) records. This authorization is contingent on the employee or agent being physically located in North America and the edit or annotation remaining subject to the commercial driver's final approval. The aim is to provide greater flexibility in managing ELD data.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill will enhance efficiency and accuracy in ELD record-keeping by allowing qualified motor carrier staff to proactively identify and correct errors or add necessary annotations. This reduces the administrative burden on drivers, who might otherwise have to make all edits themselves, and ensures compliance with hours-of-service regulations is maintained with greater ease and flexibility, especially for larger fleets with dedicated back-office support.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that allowing remote carrier personnel to edit ELD records, even with driver approval, could introduce new avenues for potential coercion or pressure on drivers to approve changes that might not accurately reflect their actual hours of service. This could undermine the integrity of ELD data, which is crucial for ensuring driver safety and preventing fatigue-related accidents, potentially making it harder for regulators to detect hours-of-service violations.

The bill is exceptionally short and can be read and understood quickly, making it highly accessible for anyone wishing to evaluate its contents.

Section 2, paragraph (4) of Section 31137(b) of title 49, United States Code

Authorization for Remote Editing and Annotation of ELD Records

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision modifies existing federal law concerning electronic logging devices (ELDs) used by commercial truck drivers. It explicitly permits employees or agents of a motor carrier to make edits or add notes to a driver's ELD records. The key conditions are that the employee or agent must be located within North America, and any such edit or annotation must ultimately be approved by the driver whose record is being modified. This aims to provide flexibility in managing ELD data.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupMotor CarriersImpactIncreased flexibility and efficiency in ELD record managementMechanismAllows back-office staff to initiate corrections and annotations to ELD records.ScaleApplies to all motor carriers utilizing ELDs for their drivers.
GroupCommercial Truck DriversImpactPotential reduction in administrative burden; potential for increased pressure or coercionMechanismDrivers retain final approval power over edits but may face implicit pressure to accept changes proposed by their employers.ScaleApplies to all commercial truck drivers using ELDs.
GroupFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)ImpactPotential challenges in oversight and enforcement of hours-of-service rulesMechanismChanges how ELD records can be modified, potentially complicating audits and the detection of hours-of-service violations.ScaleAffects regulatory oversight nationwide for commercial trucking.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision streamlines compliance for motor carriers by allowing trained administrative staff to correct minor errors or add necessary context to ELD records, reducing the burden on drivers who are often on the road and have limited time for such tasks. They contend that driver approval acts as a sufficient safeguard against misuse.

Critics contend

Opponents express concern that while driver approval is required, the ability for carriers to initiate edits could create an environment where drivers feel pressured to approve changes that might not accurately reflect their actual driving time, potentially compromising safety and hours-of-service compliance. They argue it could open a loophole for manipulating records.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire for administrative efficiency and flexibility in ELD record management for motor carriers against the imperative to maintain the integrity and accuracy of driver hours-of-service records to ensure public and driver safety.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this