4 versions

CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with INTRODUCED IN HOUSE (Jun 22, 2026)

Technical corrections only. The changes between v1 and v4 reflect the bill's procedural progression from introduction in the House to being passed by the House and referred to the Senate. There are no substantive policy changes to the bill's text.

Skipping v2 (REPORTED IN HOUSE) and v3 (ENGROSSED IN HOUSE). Those versions changed too little to need their own analysis, so they reuse INTRODUCED IN HOUSE's. Changes are measured from the most recent version analyzed on its own.

H.R. 9382119th CongressIntroduced Jun 22, 2026

To require the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to link together applications of family members throughout the NEXUS application process, and for other purposes.

Passed HouseImmigrationSubstantive

View bill text

Sponsor: Rep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26]
Committees: Homeland Security Committee (primary)
Last action: Sep 16, 2026

This analysis was written for v1 (INTRODUCED IN HOUSE, Jun 22, 2026). REFERRED IN SENATE changed too little to need its own, so it reuses that one rather than a rewrite. The differences between the two are summarized above. View v1

Bottom line

The bill aims to streamline the NEXUS trusted traveler program application process for families by enabling linked applications, consolidated scheduling, and potential interview exemptions for young children.

What it actually does

This bill mandates that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) link together NEXUS applications for family members within 180 days of enactment. It allows a single family member to schedule interviews for all linked family members and gives CBP the option to offer joint interviews. Furthermore, it permits CBP to exempt children under 14 years of age from the interview process if they are linked to an eligible family member's application.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill will significantly improve the user experience for families applying for the NEXUS program, reducing administrative burdens and making international travel more accessible. They contend that the current process, which requires separate scheduling and interviews for each family member, is cumbersome and a deterrent for many families, especially those with young children. This bill would align the NEXUS program with common-sense family-friendly practices.

Opponents contend

Critics, if any, might raise concerns about the potential administrative and technical challenges for CBP in implementing a new linked application system and managing interview exemptions. Some might also argue that exempting any applicant, regardless of age, from an interview could introduce a minor security vulnerability, even if mitigated by linking to an eligible adult. However, given the nature of the NEXUS program, which already involves background checks, strong opposition is unlikely.

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 1(a)

Mandatory Linking of Family Member Applications

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to establish a system that links together the applications of family members throughout the NEXUS application process. This change must be implemented within 180 days after the bill becomes law. The goal is to create a more cohesive and less fragmented application experience for families.

GroupImpactMechanismScale

GroupFamilies applying for NEXUSImpactPositiveMechanismStreamlines the application process by allowing family members' applications to be grouped together.ScaleBroad, affecting all eligible families

GroupU.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)ImpactOperational burdenMechanismRequires development and implementation of new IT systems and protocols.ScaleInternal, affecting CBP's IT and administrative divisions

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is essential for modernizing the NEXUS program, making it more user-friendly and efficient for families. They believe it addresses a long-standing frustration for applicants who currently navigate individual applications for each family member.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against this provision, as it is seen as an administrative improvement. Potential critics might point to the cost and complexity of updating CBP's IT infrastructure, but generally acknowledge the benefit.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension is between the desire for administrative efficiency and the resources required for CBP to develop and integrate the necessary technological solutions. However, the long-term benefits of improved customer service are expected to outweigh initial implementation costs.

Section 1(b)

Interview Scheduling and Joint Interview Options

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision grants an individual family member the ability to schedule interviews for all linked family members at once. Additionally, it gives the Commissioner of CBP the option to offer joint interviews for these linked families. This aims to reduce the logistical challenge of coordinating multiple interview appointments for a single household.

Section 1(c)

Interview Exemption for Children Under 14

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section provides the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection with the discretion to exempt children under 14 years of age from the interview requirement during the NEXUS application process, provided they are linked to an eligible family member's application. This aims to further ease the application burden for families with young children.

FOUND

Defines 'family members' for the purpose of the linked application process to include parents, legal guardians, children, grandparents, grandchildren, and siblings residing within a single household.

Section 1(d)(1)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to define terms used throughout the bill in a dedicated section.

Case for: Supporters would argue that a clear and comprehensive definition of 'family members' is crucial to ensure consistent application of the bill's provisions and to prevent ambiguity regarding who qualifies for the streamlined process.

Case against: No specific case against this definition. Any critique would likely focus on whether the scope of 'family members' is too broad or too narrow, potentially excluding or including groups that were not the primary intent.

Estimated impact: This definition directly determines the scope of individuals who can benefit from the linked NEXUS application process, impacting a significant number of multi-generational or extended families residing together.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

CosmeticWhat changed in REFERRED IN SENATEcompared with INTRODUCED IN HOUSE (Jun 22, 2026)

H.R. 9382119th CongressIntroduced Jun 22, 2026

To require the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to link together applications of family members throughout the NEXUS application process, and for other purposes.

Passed HouseImmigrationSubstantive

View bill text

Sponsor: Rep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26]
Committees: Homeland Security Committee (primary)
Last action: Sep 16, 2026

Bottom line

What it actually does

Proponents argue

Opponents contend

The bill is very short and straightforward, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its provisions quickly.

Section 1(a)

Mandatory Linking of Family Member Applications

prominently featuredstraightforward

GroupImpactMechanismScale

GroupFamilies applying for NEXUSImpactPositiveMechanismStreamlines the application process by allowing family members' applications to be grouped together.ScaleBroad, affecting all eligible families

Supporters argue

Critics contend

Tradeoffs

Section 1(b)

Interview Scheduling and Joint Interview Options

prominently featuredstraightforward

Section 1(c)

Interview Exemption for Children Under 14

prominently featuredstraightforward

FOUND

Defines 'family members' for the purpose of the linked application process to include parents, legal guardians, children, grandparents, grandchildren, and siblings residing within a single household.

Section 1(d)(1)

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice to define terms used throughout the bill in a dedicated section.