The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9386·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 22, 2026

United States Commission on an Open Society with Security Act of 2026

IntroducedGovernment Operations and PoliticsSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
Committees
Homeland Security Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 7, 2026

Bottom line

This bill creates a temporary expert commission to recommend strategies for enhancing security in public spaces without compromising democratic values of openness and access.

What it actually does

This bill establishes a 21-member United States Commission on an Open Society with Security. The commission is tasked with studying and making recommendations on how the U.S. government can effectively balance security measures in federal buildings and properties with the public's right to access these spaces, engage in free speech, and protect civil liberties.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that in an era of unique security challenges, a dedicated, multidisciplinary commission is essential to develop comprehensive, balanced solutions that protect both public safety and fundamental American freedoms. It ensures a thoughtful, expert-driven approach rather than reactive, piecemeal measures, fostering a national dialogue on a critical tension.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that such commissions can be slow, costly, and often produce recommendations that are either obvious or politically unfeasible. They might contend that existing agencies already possess the expertise to address these issues, making a new commission redundant or an unnecessary bureaucratic layer that delays action.

The bill is concise and easily readable, allowing for quick comprehension of its purpose and structure.

Section 3

Establishment and Composition of the United States Commission on an Open Society with Security

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section formally establishes the 'United States Commission on an Open Society with Security,' composed of 21 members. These members are to be appointed by the President, Speaker of the House, House Minority Leader, Senate Majority Leader, and Senate Minority Leader, drawing from diverse fields such as architecture, technology, civil liberties, military, government, business, law, arts, security, engineering, philosophy, history, sociology, and psychology. The President designates the Chairperson.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFederal Government (Executive and Legislative branches)ImpactRequires appointment of members and provides administrative support for the commission.MechanismMandates specific appointment authorities and outlines operational structure.ScaleModerate administrative burden, temporary.
GroupExperts from various fieldsImpactOffers an opportunity to serve on a national commission and contribute specialized expertise to a critical national issue.MechanismSelection and appointment process based on professional background.ScaleLimited to 21 individuals.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that a diverse, expert-led commission is crucial for a holistic approach to complex security and access issues, ensuring a wide range of perspectives are considered in developing balanced solutions.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that the appointment process could become politicized, potentially undermining the commission's impartiality or leading to a body that lacks true consensus or effectiveness in its recommendations.

Tradeoffs

The primary tension involves balancing the need for diverse, specialized expertise with the potential for political considerations influencing appointments, and ensuring the commission remains focused and productive despite varied viewpoints.

Section 4

Functions of the Commission: Study and Recommendations on Balancing Security and Public Access

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section outlines the core mandate of the Commission: to study and make findings and recommendations on how the U.S. Government can provide, in a balanced manner, for both security in and public access to Federal buildings and other Federal property and sites. It specifically requires examination of security practices, building design, public space management, counterterrorism needs, refurbishment, effects on free speech and civil liberties, local economies, architectural aesthetics, traffic, job performance, technology use, practices of other nations, and risk assessment methods.

Sections 7 and 8

Final Report Submission and Commission Termination

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision mandates that the Commission submit its final report to the President within 2 years of its initial meeting. The report must contain detailed findings, conclusions, and recommendations for legislative, administrative, or other actions. The President is then required to transmit this report to Congress, along with any comments or proposed legislation, within 6 months of receiving it. The Commission is set to terminate 90 days after submitting its final report to the President.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this