The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9395·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 23, 2026

Transparency in Medicare Advantage Steering Act

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria [D-NY-14]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 25, 2026

Bottom line

The bill mandates increased transparency regarding how Medicare Advantage organizations compensate agents and brokers, aiming to provide beneficiaries and the public with more information about enrollment practices.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Social Security Act to require Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations to annually report detailed information about compensation paid to agents, brokers, and other third parties who enroll individuals in MA plans. Beginning in 2030, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) would be required to make aggregate compensation data publicly available and include an indicator in its Chronic Condition Data Warehouse identifying individuals enrolled by third parties.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill will enhance transparency in the Medicare Advantage market, empowering beneficiaries to make more informed choices by shedding light on potential conflicts of interest where agents might prioritize higher commissions over a beneficiary's best health plan. They contend it will reduce deceptive marketing practices and 'steering' of beneficiaries into plans that are not optimally suited for their needs, thereby improving consumer protection and accountability.

Opponents contend

Critics may contend that the bill imposes an undue administrative burden and compliance costs on Medicare Advantage organizations, which could ultimately be passed on to beneficiaries through higher premiums or reduced plan benefits. They might also argue that the public dissemination of compensation data, especially in aggregate, could be misinterpreted, leading to unfair scrutiny of agents and potentially disincentivizing their role in assisting beneficiaries with complex plan selections.

The bill text is concise and easily digestible, allowing for a quick understanding of its provisions.

Section 2, amending Section 1857(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-27(e))

Annual Reporting of Agent and Broker Compensation for Medicare Advantage Enrollments

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations, starting with plan years on or after January 1, 2028, to annually report specific information to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. For each individual enrolled, they must report if an agent, broker, or third party was involved, and if so, the amount and form of compensation paid to that party. Additionally, MA organizations must report the total compensation paid to all such agents, brokers, and third parties for all MA plan enrollments for that year, along with any other information the Secretary deems necessary. Beginning January 1, 2030, CMS must include an indicator in its Chronic Condition Data Warehouse for third-party enrollments and make the total compensation data publicly available on its website.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupMedicare Advantage OrganizationsImpactIncreased administrative burden and compliance costsMechanismNew statutory requirement for detailed annual reporting of agent/broker compensation.ScalePotentially significant, depending on the number of agents/brokers and existing data systems.
GroupMedicare BeneficiariesImpactImproved access to information and potential reduction in 'steering'MechanismPublicly available aggregate compensation data and an indicator in the Chronic Condition Data Warehouse.ScaleBroad, affecting all MA enrollees and those considering enrollment.
GroupMedicare Agents and BrokersImpactIncreased scrutiny of compensation practices and potential impact on business modelsMechanismIndividual compensation data reported to CMS (not public), total compensation made public.ScaleDirect impact on their business practices and public perception.
GroupCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)ImpactExpanded data collection, storage, and public dissemination responsibilitiesMechanismNew statutory mandate to collect, store, and publish specific data.ScaleModerate increase in administrative workload and system development.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision is crucial for bringing much-needed transparency to the Medicare Advantage enrollment process. By requiring detailed reporting of agent compensation and making aggregate data public, it allows beneficiaries, policymakers, and oversight bodies to identify potential conflicts of interest and practices where agents might be incentivized to enroll individuals in plans that offer higher commissions rather than those best suited for the beneficiary. This transparency is seen as a vital step towards protecting vulnerable seniors from deceptive marketing and 'steering' tactics.

Critics contend

Opponents may argue that while transparency is a laudable goal, this provision creates a significant administrative and financial burden for MA organizations. They might contend that collecting and reporting such granular data is complex and costly, potentially leading to increased operational expenses that could ultimately be passed on to beneficiaries through higher premiums or reduced benefits. Furthermore, they may raise concerns that publicly available aggregate compensation data could be misinterpreted, leading to unfair conclusions about agent practices without full context.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire for greater transparency and consumer protection in the Medicare Advantage market against the potential for increased administrative burden on MA organizations and the complexities of interpreting publicly available compensation data. It seeks to empower beneficiaries with more information while potentially altering the operational landscape for MA plans and their sales agents.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this