The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 942·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 4, 2025

Banning SPR Oil Exports to Foreign Adversaries Act

IntroducedEnergyMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Houlahan, Chrissy [D-PA-6]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 4, 2025

Bottom line

H.R. 942 aims to prevent U.S. strategic oil reserves from benefiting designated foreign adversaries, with a national security waiver for exceptional circumstances.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to explicitly prohibit the export or sale of petroleum products drawn from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to four specific countries: China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran, as well as any entity owned or controlled by these countries or the Chinese Communist Party. It includes a waiver provision for national security interests and mandates a rule-making process for implementation.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is a critical national security asset intended to protect the U.S. from supply disruptions, and its resources should never be used to inadvertently support or strengthen adversarial nations. Preventing such sales ensures that U.S. energy security measures do not undermine broader foreign policy objectives or provide economic benefits to countries actively working against U.S. interests.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that such a blanket prohibition could limit the flexibility of the Secretary of Energy during a global energy crisis, potentially hindering efforts to stabilize international oil markets if a sale to one of these countries, even indirectly, could alleviate a broader supply crunch that impacts U.S. allies. They might also raise concerns about the administrative burden of tracking ownership and control for all entities involved in SPR sales.

The bill is very short and straightforward, allowing for quick comprehension by any interested reader.

Section 2(a), inserting new Section 164 into the Energy Policy and Conservation Act

Prohibition on Export or Sale of SPR Petroleum to Foreign Adversaries

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision establishes a new legal requirement preventing the Secretary of Energy from exporting or selling oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to China, North Korea, Russia, Iran, or any entity controlled by these nations or the Chinese Communist Party. It also grants the Secretary the authority to waive this prohibition if such a sale is certified to be in the national security interests of the United States. The Secretary is mandated to issue a rule to implement this section within 60 days of the bill's enactment.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. Department of Energy (Secretary of Energy)ImpactImposes a new restriction on the sale and export of SPR petroleum, requiring the development and enforcement of new rules.MechanismStatutory amendment to the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.ScaleAffects all future SPR drawdowns and sales processes.
GroupDesignated foreign adversary nations (People's Republic of China, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Islamic Republic of Iran) and their controlled entities.ImpactProhibits them from directly purchasing U.S. SPR petroleum.MechanismDirect statutory prohibition.ScaleImpacts their ability to access U.S. strategic oil reserves during potential global supply disruptions.
GroupU.S. oil companies and traders involved in SPR sales.ImpactRequires enhanced due diligence to ensure compliance with the prohibition on sales to specified entities.MechanismRegulatory compliance requirement stemming from the new statutory prohibition.ScaleMinor operational adjustment for compliance, potentially increasing administrative costs.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly addresses a national security vulnerability by ensuring that U.S. strategic assets are not inadvertently used to benefit geopolitical rivals. They contend it aligns the use of the SPR with broader U.S. foreign policy and national security objectives, preventing situations where U.S. oil might indirectly fund or support adversarial regimes.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that while the intent is sound, the practical implementation could create unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles for legitimate sales, or that in a severe global energy crisis, limiting potential buyers could reduce the effectiveness of SPR drawdowns in stabilizing prices, even if the buyers are adversaries. Some might also argue that the waiver provision already provides sufficient flexibility.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the desire to prevent adversaries from benefiting from U.S. strategic reserves against the need for flexibility in managing global energy markets during crises. It also balances national security concerns with potential administrative complexities for oil traders and the Department of Energy.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this