The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9431·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 24, 2026

Fair Telehealth Billing Act of 2026

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Hayes, Jahana [D-CT-5]
Committees
Education and Workforce Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 24, 2026

Bottom line

The Fair Telehealth Billing Act of 2026 aims to reduce healthcare costs for consumers by eliminating redundant facility fees for telehealth services, ensuring patients are only charged for the professional service rendered remotely.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to prohibit health care providers and facilities from billing a separate facility fee for telehealth services. This prohibition applies when the health care provider delivering the telehealth service is already authorized to bill independently for their professional services. The bill also grants the Secretary of Labor the authority to assess civil monetary penalties of up to $10,000 per violation for non-compliance, with an effective date of January 1, 2028.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that facility fees for telehealth are an outdated practice that unfairly inflates healthcare costs, as patients are not physically utilizing a facility. They contend that eliminating these fees will make telehealth more affordable and accessible, aligning billing practices with the virtual nature of the service and reducing unexpected charges for consumers covered by ERISA plans.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that facilities still incur legitimate overhead costs associated with providing telehealth services, such as technology infrastructure, administrative support, and compliance, which facility fees help cover. They may contend that prohibiting these fees could reduce the financial viability of offering telehealth, potentially limiting access to care, especially for smaller or rural providers, or shifting costs to other services.

The bill is very concise and can be read and understood quickly, making it accessible for immediate evaluation.

Section 2(a) and 2(b)

Prohibition on Telehealth Facility Fees and Enforcement

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to prevent healthcare providers and facilities from charging a distinct 'facility fee' for telehealth services. This prohibition applies specifically when the healthcare provider delivering the telehealth service is already authorized to bill independently for their professional services. Furthermore, the bill grants the Secretary of Labor the authority to assess civil monetary penalties of up to $10,000 per violation against any provider or facility found to be in non-compliance, with the prohibition taking effect for services furnished on or after January 1, 2028.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupPatients/Consumers covered by ERISA plansImpactReduced out-of-pocket costs for telehealth services.MechanismDirect prohibition of a specific fee type.ScalePotentially widespread for individuals using telehealth services covered by ERISA plans.
GroupHealth Care Providers and FacilitiesImpactPotential reduction in revenue; increased compliance burden.MechanismElimination of a revenue stream; new penalties for non-compliance.ScaleAffects all providers and facilities billing for telehealth services under ERISA plans.
GroupEmployee Benefit Plans (covered by ERISA)ImpactPotential reduction in claims costs for telehealth services.MechanismElimination of a specific fee type from covered services.ScaleAffects all plans that cover telehealth services.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision directly addresses a common source of unexpected and unjustified costs for patients receiving telehealth. They contend that a facility fee is illogical for a service not rendered in a physical facility, and its elimination will foster greater transparency and affordability in virtual care, encouraging its use.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that facilities incur legitimate operational costs (e.g., technology, administrative staff, regulatory compliance) to support telehealth infrastructure, even if a physical room isn't used. They may contend that prohibiting these fees could force facilities to absorb these costs, potentially leading to reduced telehealth offerings, higher charges for other services, or financial strain, especially for smaller practices.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the goal of reducing patient costs and increasing telehealth affordability against the potential financial impact on healthcare facilities that rely on facility fees to cover overhead associated with maintaining telehealth infrastructure and services.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this