The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9447·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 24, 2026

Getting Terrorist Fanatics Out Act of 2026

IntroducedImmigrationMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Van Duyne, Beth [R-TX-24]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 24, 2026

Bottom line

The bill expands the grounds for mandatory denaturalization to include convictions for providing material support to terrorism, thereby allowing for the revocation of citizenship for naturalized citizens found guilty of these offenses.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to mandate the denaturalization of any naturalized U.S. citizen upon conviction for providing material support to terrorists or designated foreign terrorist organizations under sections 2339A or 2339B of title 18, United States Code. It confers jurisdiction on the courts handling such convictions to revoke and cancel the individual's citizenship and naturalization certificate.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill is a critical national security measure, ensuring that individuals who provide material support to terrorism, thereby betraying their oath of allegiance, are stripped of their U.S. citizenship. They contend it closes a perceived loophole, preventing those who actively aid terrorist organizations from retaining the privileges of American citizenship and potentially facing deportation.

Opponents contend

Opponents contend that this bill creates a two-tiered system of citizenship, where naturalized citizens face a penalty (loss of citizenship) that native-born citizens do not, even if they commit similar or worse offenses. They argue it raises significant due process and equal protection concerns, and that existing criminal penalties and deportation laws for non-citizens are already sufficient to address terrorism-related offenses.

The bill text is exceptionally short and can be read in under two minutes, making it highly accessible for quick review.

Section 2

Mandatory Denaturalization for Terrorist Offenses

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends Section 340(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. It adds a new clause specifying that if a person is convicted under 18 U.S.C. 2339A (providing material support to terrorists) or 18 U.S.C. 2339B (providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations), the court where the conviction occurred must revoke their citizenship and cancel their naturalization certificate. This makes denaturalization a mandatory consequence of such convictions for naturalized citizens.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupNaturalized U.S. citizensImpactLoss of U.S. citizenship and potential deportationMechanismMandatory court order upon conviction for specific terrorism-related offensesScaleIndividual, but with broader implications for the status of naturalized citizens
GroupFederal CourtsImpactExpanded jurisdiction and mandatory dutyMechanismConferred jurisdiction to issue denaturalization orders concurrent with criminal convictionScaleProcedural change for courts handling these specific criminal cases

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision is essential for national security, ensuring that individuals who have demonstrated disloyalty to the United States by supporting terrorism cannot retain the privilege of citizenship. They believe it strengthens the integrity of U.S. citizenship and provides a clear consequence for such grave offenses.

Critics contend

Critics contend that this provision creates a disparate impact on naturalized citizens compared to native-born citizens who commit similar crimes, potentially violating equal protection principles. They argue that existing criminal penalties and immigration laws already provide sufficient mechanisms to address individuals who engage in terrorism-related activities.

Tradeoffs

This provision navigates the tension between enhancing national security by imposing severe consequences for terrorism-related offenses and upholding principles of equal protection and due process for all citizens, regardless of how citizenship was acquired.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this