The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9489·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 25, 2026

GRACE for Military Survivors Act

IntroducedTaxationSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-4]
Committees
Ways and Means Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 25, 2026

Bottom line

The bill provides military survivors with a longer, more flexible window to contribute military death benefits into tax-advantaged Roth IRAs and Coverdell education savings accounts, including a retroactive application for past beneficiaries.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the period during which military death benefits can be contributed to Roth IRAs and Coverdell education savings accounts from one year to three years. It also applies this extension retroactively to amounts received on or after October 7, 2001, allowing eligible survivors more time to make these tax-advantaged contributions.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that extending the contribution period from one year to three years provides crucial relief to grieving military families, allowing them adequate time to make informed financial decisions regarding their death benefits without the pressure of a tight deadline. This change acknowledges the immense emotional and administrative burden faced by survivors, ensuring they can fully utilize intended tax advantages for long-term savings and education.

Opponents contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against this bill, as it is a narrowly targeted measure designed to support military survivors by easing administrative burdens during a difficult time. Any potential concerns would likely be general arguments about tax expenditures, but this specific provision is widely viewed as a compassionate adjustment.

The bill is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for quick evaluation.

Section 2(a) and 2(b)

Extension of Contribution Period for Military Death Benefits to Roth IRAs and Coverdell ESAs

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision changes the allowable period for contributing military death benefits, such as the Death Gratuity (Title 10, Section 1477) or Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (Title 38, Section 1967), into Roth IRAs and Coverdell Education Savings Accounts. It extends this window from the current one year to three years after the benefits are received. Furthermore, it applies this extension retroactively to benefits received on or after October 7, 2001, provided the contribution is made within three years of receipt or one year after the bill's enactment, whichever is later.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupSurviving spouses and children of deceased servicemembersImpactProvides increased flexibility and time to contribute military death benefits into tax-advantaged savings accounts, potentially leading to greater long-term financial security and educational opportunities.MechanismAmends existing sections of the Internal Revenue Code (408A(e)(2)(A) and 530(d)(9)(A)) to change the time limit for contributions.ScaleAffects all eligible military survivors who receive specified death benefits, both currently and retroactively to October 7, 2001.

Supporters argue

Proponents argue that the original one-year window was often insufficient for families grappling with the profound grief and administrative complexities following a servicemember's death. The three-year extension offers a more realistic timeframe, allowing survivors to make thoughtful financial decisions without added stress, thereby maximizing the benefit of these tax-advantaged accounts.

Critics contend

No specific opposition is typically raised against this provision, as it is widely supported as a compassionate and practical adjustment for military families. Any general concerns about tax expenditures are usually outweighed by the recognition of the unique circumstances of military survivors.

Tradeoffs

The primary tradeoff involves a minor increase in federal tax expenditures due to more individuals potentially utilizing the tax-advantaged status over a longer period. This is balanced against the significant benefit of providing greater flexibility and support to military families during a period of immense personal hardship, aligning tax policy with the realities of grief and financial planning.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this