The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9515·119th Congress·Introduced Jun 29, 2026

MFA Act

IntroducedHealthSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Grothman, Glenn [R-WI-6]
Committees
Energy and Commerce Committee (primary)
Last action
Jun 29, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to enhance the security of healthcare.gov by requiring multi-factor authentication, with provisions to protect access for individuals lacking necessary technological resources.

What it actually does

This bill, titled the "Marketplace Fraud Accountability Act," mandates the use of multi-factor authentication (MFA) for individuals accessing healthcare.gov to enroll in qualified health plans or access personalized enrollment information. The requirement would take effect one year after the bill's enactment and applies to plan years beginning on or after that date. It includes exceptions for individuals without broadband or cellular service, or those otherwise unable to use MFA for reasons specified by the Secretary.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that requiring multi-factor authentication is a critical step to protect sensitive personal health and financial information, reduce fraud and identity theft within the healthcare marketplace, and align healthcare.gov with modern cybersecurity standards. They contend that the included exceptions ensure that vulnerable populations are not unduly burdened.

Opponents contend

Critics might express concerns that even with exceptions, implementing mandatory multi-factor authentication could create new barriers to access for some individuals, particularly those with limited digital literacy or inconsistent internet access. They may also argue that the administrative burden and costs of implementing and managing such a system, including verifying exceptions, could be substantial.

The bill is very short and clear, making it highly accessible for any reader to understand its core provisions within a few minutes.

Section 2(a), amending Section 1311(c) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18031(c))

Mandatory Multi-Factor Authentication for Healthcare.gov

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for healthcare.gov within one year of the bill's enactment. This MFA will be necessary for individuals enrolling in health plans through an Exchange or accessing their personal enrollment data. MFA is defined as verifying identity using two or more factors, such as a password (knowledge), a token (possession), or biometrics (inherence).

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIndividuals enrolling in health plans via healthcare.govImpactIncreased security and potentially increased complexity of accessMechanismRequirement to use MFA for loginScaleMillions of users annually
GroupFederal government (HHS)ImpactIncreased administrative burden and costs for implementation and maintenanceMechanismMandate to develop and deploy MFA systemScaleSignificant operational change

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this provision is essential for safeguarding sensitive personal information and preventing fraud on a critical government healthcare platform. They believe it brings healthcare.gov up to modern security standards, protecting both individuals and taxpayer resources.

Critics contend

Critics may contend that while security is important, this mandate could inadvertently create barriers for some users, particularly those in rural areas or with limited technological proficiency, even with the stated exceptions. They might argue for more flexible or opt-in security measures.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the critical need for enhanced cybersecurity with the imperative to maintain accessible healthcare services for all eligible individuals. The tension lies in ensuring robust security without creating undue burdens or excluding vulnerable populations from accessing essential health coverage.

Section 2(a)(8)(B)

Exceptions to Multi-Factor Authentication Requirement

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This subsection outlines specific exceptions to the mandatory multi-factor authentication. It states that the MFA requirement will not apply to individuals who lack access to broadband or cellular service, or who are otherwise unable to use MFA for reasons that the Secretary of Health and Human Services may specify. This aims to prevent technological barriers from hindering access to healthcare services.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this