The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 957·119th Congress·Introduced Feb 4, 2025

Parity Enforcement Act of 2025

IntroducedHealthMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Norcross, Donald [D-NJ-1]
Committees
Education and Workforce Committee (primary)
Last action
Feb 4, 2025

Bottom line

The bill significantly strengthens the enforcement of mental health and substance use disorder parity laws by introducing financial penalties and expanding the Department of Labor's direct enforcement authority.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to authorize the Secretary of Labor to impose civil monetary penalties on group health plan sponsors, service providers, administrators, and health insurance issuers for failing to meet mental health and substance use disorder parity requirements. It also explicitly clarifies the Secretary's authority to enforce these parity requirements directly.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that existing mental health parity laws lack sufficient enforcement mechanisms, leading to widespread non-compliance. This bill provides a crucial deterrent through civil monetary penalties, ensuring that individuals receive equitable access to mental health and substance use disorder care, and holding all responsible entities accountable.

Opponents contend

Critics might contend that introducing civil monetary penalties could impose an undue regulatory burden and financial risk on plan sponsors, service providers, and health insurance issuers, potentially increasing administrative costs or discouraging employers from offering comprehensive health benefits.

The bill is very short and clear, allowing for quick comprehension of its direct impact.

Section 2(a)

Establishes Civil Monetary Penalties for Mental Health Parity Violations

prominently featuredstraightforward

This provision amends Section 502(c)(10) of ERISA to allow the Secretary of Labor to impose civil monetary penalties on any plan sponsor, service provider, administrator, or health insurance issuer of a group health plan for failing to meet the mental health and substance use disorder parity requirements under Section 712(a). This expands the scope of entities subject to penalties and explicitly includes parity violations alongside genetic information non-compliance.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupGroup health plans, plan sponsors, service providers, plan administrators, health insurance issuersImpactIncreased legal and financial liability for non-compliance with mental health parity requirements.MechanismNew civil monetary penalties can be levied by the Secretary of Labor.ScalePotentially significant financial penalties per violation, acting as a strong deterrent.
GroupIndividuals with mental health and substance use disordersImpactImproved access to benefits and stronger protections against discriminatory practices in health coverage.MechanismEnhanced enforcement of existing mental health parity laws.ScaleBroad impact on beneficiaries of ERISA-governed health plans seeking mental health and substance use disorder treatment.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision closes a critical enforcement gap, providing a powerful deterrent against parity violations and ensuring that mental health and substance use disorder benefits are truly on par with medical/surgical benefits. It holds all relevant entities in the health plan ecosystem accountable.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that introducing civil monetary penalties adds an undue regulatory burden and financial risk to plan sponsors and administrators, potentially increasing administrative costs or discouraging employers from offering comprehensive health plans due to fear of penalties.

Tradeoffs

This provision balances the need for robust enforcement of mental health parity laws to protect beneficiaries against concerns about increased compliance costs and potential penalties for employers and health plans, aiming to achieve greater equity in health coverage.

Section 2(b)

Clarifies Secretary's Enforcement Authority for Mental Health Parity

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This section amends ERISA Section 502(b)(3) to explicitly state that the general prohibition on enforcement by the Secretary of Labor does not apply to Section 712, which outlines mental health and substance use disorder parity requirements. This clarification ensures the Secretary has unambiguous authority to enforce these provisions, including the new civil monetary penalties established in Section 2(a).

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this