The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9575·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 2, 2026

Hold Vandals Accountable Act of 2026

IntroducedCrime and Law EnforcementSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Fallon, Pat [R-TX-4]
Committees
Judiciary Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 2, 2026

Bottom line

The "Hold Vandals Accountable Act of 2026" lowers the monetary threshold for felony charges related to damaging U.S. government property from $1,000 to $500, potentially increasing the severity of penalties for certain acts of vandalism.

What it actually does

This bill amends federal law (18 U.S.C. 1361) to lower the monetary threshold for property damage to U.S. government property that triggers a felony charge. Currently, damage exceeding $1,000 can result in a felony, while damage below that is a misdemeanor. This bill reduces that threshold to $500, meaning damage between $500 and $1,000 that was previously a misdemeanor would now be a felony.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that this bill strengthens accountability for those who damage federal property by ensuring that even moderate levels of damage are treated with appropriate seriousness. They contend that the current $1,000 threshold is outdated and does not adequately deter vandalism, especially given inflation, and that lowering it to $500 will better protect public assets and send a clear message that such acts will not be tolerated.

Opponents contend

Opponents might argue that lowering the felony threshold could lead to an over-criminalization of minor offenses, disproportionately affecting individuals who cause damage just above the new $500 mark. They may contend that it could strain the federal justice system with more felony cases and that existing penalties for misdemeanors are sufficient for damage under $1,000, without the harsher consequences of a felony conviction.

The bill text is extremely short and straightforward, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its direct impact.

Section 2

Amendment to 18 U.S.C. 1361 Regarding Government Property Damage Threshold

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends Title 18, Section 1361 of the United States Code, which deals with damage or attempted damage to government property or contracts. Specifically, it changes the monetary value that distinguishes a misdemeanor from a felony offense. Currently, if the damage exceeds $1,000, it is a felony; otherwise, it is a misdemeanor. This bill reduces that threshold to $500, meaning any damage valued at $500 or more would now be considered a felony.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIndividuals who damage U.S. government propertyImpactIncreased severity of potential criminal charges for damage between $500 and $999.MechanismLowering the felony threshold in 18 U.S.C. 1361.ScalePotentially affects a subset of vandalism cases against federal property.
GroupFederal prosecutors and the federal justice systemImpactPotential increase in felony caseloads for property damage offenses.MechanismMore incidents now qualify as felonies.ScaleModerate, depending on the prevalence of damage in the $500-$999 range.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this change is necessary to reflect the true cost of damage and to ensure that acts of vandalism against federal property are met with serious consequences, regardless of whether the damage slightly exceeds an arbitrary $1,000 threshold. They believe it will deter such acts and protect taxpayer-funded assets more effectively.

Critics contend

Critics might argue that this provision could lead to harsher penalties for relatively minor acts of vandalism, potentially resulting in felony convictions and their associated lifelong consequences (e.g., voting rights, employment) for actions that might not warrant such severity. They may also point to the potential for increased incarceration rates and costs.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire for stricter accountability and deterrence against concerns about over-criminalization and the potential for disproportionately severe penalties for offenses that might otherwise be handled as misdemeanors.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this