The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9585·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 2, 2026

Advancing American Quantum Leadership Act of 2026

IntroducedForeign Trade and International FinanceSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17]
Committees
Financial Services Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 2, 2026

Bottom line

The bill expands the types of quantum technologies eligible for U.S. Export-Import Bank financing, aiming to bolster American competitiveness in the broader quantum sector against foreign rivals.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 to broaden the scope of technologies covered under the Program on China and Transformational Exports. Specifically, it changes the eligible category from "Quantum computing" to the more expansive "Quantum information science and technology," allowing the Export-Import Bank to support a wider range of U.S. exports in the quantum sector.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that expanding the definition from 'quantum computing' to 'quantum information science and technology' is essential for the U.S. to maintain its global leadership in a rapidly evolving and strategically vital field. They contend that the broader definition accurately reflects the full spectrum of quantum innovation, including sensing, communication, and materials, ensuring the Export-Import Bank can support a wider array of U.S. companies competing against state-backed foreign entities, particularly from China.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that broadening the scope of the Export-Import Bank's programs, even for strategic technologies, could lead to increased government intervention in markets, potentially distorting competition or exposing taxpayers to undue risk if projects in nascent technologies fail. Some may also question the effectiveness of such a broad mandate without clear guidelines for what constitutes 'quantum information science and technology' beyond computing, potentially leading to inefficient allocation of resources.

The bill text is extremely short and straightforward, making it very accessible for any reader to understand its direct legislative impact.

Section 2

Expansion of Transformational Exports Program to include Quantum Information Science and Technology

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 to broaden the definition of quantum technologies eligible for support under the Program on China and Transformational Exports. Previously, the program specifically mentioned "Quantum computing." This bill replaces that narrow term with the more comprehensive "Quantum information science and technology," allowing the Export-Import Bank to finance a wider array of U.S. exports in areas like quantum sensing, communication, and materials, in addition to computing.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupU.S. companies involved in quantum information science and technology (beyond just computing)ImpactIncreased access to financing and export credit insurance from the Export-Import Bank.MechanismEligibility for Ex-Im Bank support for exports related to a broader range of quantum technologies.ScalePotentially significant for companies seeking to export advanced quantum technologies, particularly in competitive global markets.
GroupForeign competitors, particularly from ChinaImpactIncreased competition from U.S. companies backed by government financing.MechanismU.S. government support for domestic quantum industry.ScaleModerate, as it levels the playing field for U.S. firms.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that this expansion is vital for U.S. national security and economic competitiveness. They contend that 'quantum computing' is too narrow a term to capture the full scope of emerging quantum technologies, and by broadening it, the U.S. can ensure its companies receive necessary financial backing to compete globally, especially against nations like China that heavily subsidize their strategic industries.

Critics contend

Opponents might argue that such a broad definition could dilute the focus of the Transformational Exports Program, potentially leading to less effective targeting of critical technologies or an overextension of the Export-Import Bank's mandate into areas where private financing might be more appropriate. They may also raise concerns about the government picking winners and losers in a nascent industry.

Tradeoffs

The bill balances the need for targeted strategic investment in critical technologies with the risk of overly broad government intervention or potential for misallocation of resources in a rapidly evolving field. It also navigates the tension between supporting U.S. industry and potentially distorting international markets.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this