The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9649·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 13, 2026

Stop Retail Food Store SNAP Trafficking Act of 2026

IntroducedAgriculture and FoodMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Burchett, Tim [R-TN-2]
Committees
Agriculture Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 13, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to reduce fraud and strengthen accountability in the SNAP program by improving data, increasing penalties for retail food store trafficking, and enhancing oversight.

What it actually does

This bill amends the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to enhance the integrity of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by improving the accuracy of estimates for retail food store trafficking of benefits. It mandates the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) to evaluate and update key assumptions in these estimates, validate them with independent data, and assess more frequent reauthorization for high-risk stores. Additionally, the bill significantly increases civil money penalties for trafficking violations and requires the Secretary of Agriculture to submit regular reports to Congress on implementation progress, updated trafficking estimates, and enforcement actions.

Proponents argue

Proponents argue that this bill is essential for safeguarding taxpayer dollars and ensuring the integrity of the SNAP program. By improving the accuracy of trafficking estimates and strengthening penalties, the bill will deter fraudulent activities by retail food stores, ensuring that benefits are used for their intended purpose of providing nutrition assistance to eligible individuals. They contend that robust enforcement is critical to maintaining public trust and the long-term viability of federal assistance programs.

Opponents contend

Opponents might raise concerns that increased penalties and more frequent reauthorization processes could disproportionately burden small businesses, particularly those operating in low-income areas, potentially leading to reduced food access if stores are driven out of the program due to fear of penalties or increased compliance costs. They might also argue that the focus on retailer trafficking, while important, should not overshadow other factors affecting program integrity or the needs of beneficiaries.

The bill is concise and clearly written, making it accessible for an informed reader to evaluate its provisions quickly.

Section 2

Improvements to Retail Food Store SNAP Benefits Trafficking Estimates

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section directs the Secretary of Agriculture, through the Administrator of the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), to update and evaluate the methods used to estimate SNAP benefit trafficking by retail food stores. This includes reviewing assumptions about trafficking percentages by store type or size and validating these assumptions with independent data, such as transaction records from known trafficking cases. FNS is also required to include ranges of uncertainty in public reports of these estimates and to assess the benefits and costs of more frequent reauthorization for high-risk stores, implementing changes as appropriate. An updated national retailer trafficking report must be published every three years.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupFood and Nutrition Service (FNS)ImpactIncreased workload and responsibility for data analysis, evaluation, and reporting.MechanismDirect mandate to evaluate, update, validate, and report on trafficking estimates.ScaleSignificant administrative impact.
GroupRetail food stores (especially high-risk ones)ImpactPotential for more frequent scrutiny and reauthorization processes.MechanismFNS assessment of more frequent reauthorization could lead to changes impacting stores.ScaleModerate compliance impact for a subset of stores.
GroupTaxpayers and SNAP beneficiariesImpactPotential for improved program integrity and reduced fraud, indirectly benefiting both groups.MechanismMore accurate data and targeted enforcement could lead to more efficient use of funds.ScaleBroad, indirect positive impact.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that more accurate and validated trafficking estimates are crucial for effective program management and targeted enforcement. By understanding the true scope and nature of trafficking, FNS can allocate resources more efficiently and develop better strategies to combat fraud, ultimately protecting the program's integrity and taxpayer investment.

Critics contend

Some might contend that the process of constantly updating and validating assumptions could be resource-intensive for FNS, potentially diverting funds from other critical program operations. There could also be concerns about how 'high-risk' stores are identified and whether increased scrutiny might unfairly target certain types of retailers.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the need for robust data and program integrity against the administrative burden on FNS and potentially increased compliance demands on retail food stores.

Section 3(a)

Increased Civil Money Penalties for Trafficking

prominently featuredstraightforward

This subsection amends Section 12 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to significantly increase the maximum civil money penalties for retail food stores found to be trafficking in SNAP benefits. Specifically, it raises the maximum penalty from $100,000 to $250,000 for each violation. This applies to both initial findings of trafficking and subsequent violations, aiming to create a stronger financial deterrent against fraudulent activities.

Section 3(b)

Regulations for Disqualification and Penalties

mentioned in summarymoderately complex

This subsection directs the Secretary of Agriculture to issue new regulations. These regulations must ensure that the permanent disqualification of retail food stores for trafficking in SNAP benefits can be accompanied by civil money penalties. Furthermore, the regulations are to ensure that penalties are more effective in deterring violations of law for such trafficking, consistent with the authority already granted to the Secretary under prior law. This aims to clarify and strengthen the Secretary's ability to impose both disqualification and financial penalties concurrently.

Section 4

Reporting Requirements to Congress

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section mandates that the Secretary of Agriculture submit a report to the House and Senate Committees on Agriculture within two years of the bill's enactment, and periodically thereafter. The report must detail the progress made in implementing the Act and its amendments, provide updated estimates of SNAP benefit trafficking by retail food stores, and include data on the number of investigations, disqualifications, and penalties imposed related to such trafficking. This ensures ongoing congressional oversight of the program's integrity efforts.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this