The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9670·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 14, 2026

Medical Bankruptcy Fairness Act of 2026

IntroducedFinance and Financial SectorMajor
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Cohen, Steve [D-TN-9]
Committees
Financial Services Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 14, 2026

Bottom line

The bill aims to provide significant financial relief and a clearer path to recovery for individuals and families facing bankruptcy primarily due to overwhelming medical debt, while also protecting their credit standing.

What it actually does

This bill amends title 11 of the United States Code (Bankruptcy Code) to create a new category of 'medically distressed debtor' and provides them with enhanced bankruptcy protections. These protections include an increased homestead exemption, waivers from the Chapter 7 means test and Chapter 13 disposable income test, an exemption from pre-bankruptcy credit counseling, and easier discharge of student loan debt. Additionally, it amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act to exclude bankruptcies filed by medically distressed debtors from consumer credit reports.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue that medical debt is often unavoidable and catastrophic, leading to financial ruin for many families through no fault of their own. This bill provides a crucial safety net, allowing individuals to get a fresh start without losing their homes or being burdened by student loans, and without their credit being permanently damaged by a medical crisis. It addresses a systemic issue where healthcare costs can lead to insurmountable financial hardship.

Opponents contend

Critics may contend that expanding bankruptcy protections, particularly for student loans and by excluding bankruptcies from credit reports, could lead to increased costs for creditors, potentially resulting in higher interest rates for all consumers or reduced access to credit. Concerns might also be raised about potential for abuse, where individuals might strategically incur medical debt to qualify for these enhanced protections, or that it shifts the burden of healthcare costs without addressing the underlying issues.

The bill is concise and its provisions are relatively straightforward, making it accessible for an informed reader to understand its core impacts within a short timeframe.

Section 2(a), Section 101 of title 11, United States Code

Defining 'Medical Debt' and 'Medically Distressed Debtor'

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section introduces new definitions into the Bankruptcy Code. 'Medical debt' is broadly defined as any debt incurred due to the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of injury, deformity, or disease. A 'medically distressed debtor' is defined by specific criteria: having incurred or paid over $10,000 or 10% of adjusted gross income in medical debt not covered by a third party, experiencing a significant reduction in income due to a medical issue (their own or a dependent's/family member's), or losing domestic support obligations due to a medical issue of the obligor. A spouse of such a debtor also qualifies.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupIndividuals with significant medical debtImpactDirectly benefits by establishing eligibility for new bankruptcy protections.MechanismCreates a specific legal category for individuals whose financial distress is primarily due to medical reasons.ScaleHigh, as it determines access to all subsequent relief.
GroupHealthcare providers and creditorsImpactIndirectly affected by the creation of a new debtor class with enhanced protections, potentially leading to reduced debt recovery.MechanismThe definition sets the scope of individuals who can utilize the new, more debtor-friendly bankruptcy rules.ScaleMedium, as it defines the pool of debtors who can access more favorable terms.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue that establishing clear, objective criteria for 'medically distressed debtor' ensures that the bill's protections are targeted at those genuinely suffering from medical-related financial hardship, preventing abuse while providing necessary relief.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that the specific financial thresholds and conditions for qualifying as 'medically distressed' could be either too broad, allowing individuals not truly in dire medical straits to benefit, or too complex to administer consistently, leading to disputes in court.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the need to provide a clear pathway to relief for medical debtors with the challenge of creating a definition that is both inclusive enough to help those in need and precise enough to prevent unintended consequences or abuse.

Section 3(a), Section 522 of title 11, United States Code

Increased Homestead Exemption for Medically Distressed Debtors

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section allows medically distressed debtors to exempt a significantly higher amount of equity in their primary residence or burial plot from their bankruptcy estate. Specifically, they can exempt up to $250,000 in value, overriding lower state or federal exemption limits that might otherwise apply. This means they can retain more of their home's value when filing for bankruptcy.

Section 4(a) and (b), Sections 707(b) and 1325(b)(1) of title 11, United States Code

Waiver of Means Test and Disposable Income Test

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section waives two key administrative requirements for medically distressed debtors. For Chapter 7 bankruptcy, it exempts them from the 'means test,' which typically prevents higher-income debtors from filing for liquidation. For Chapter 13 bankruptcy, it exempts them from the 'disposable income test,' which dictates how much income must be committed to a repayment plan. These waivers streamline the bankruptcy process and make it easier for medically distressed debtors to qualify for and complete bankruptcy.

Section 5, Section 109(h)(4) of title 11, United States Code

Waiver of Pre-Bankruptcy Credit Counseling

mentioned in summarystraightforward

This section exempts medically distressed debtors from the requirement to complete a credit counseling course from an approved agency within 180 days before filing for bankruptcy. This counseling is typically a mandatory prerequisite for all bankruptcy filers, designed to explore alternatives to bankruptcy and provide financial education.

Section 6, Section 523(a)(8) of title 11, United States Code

Easing Student Loan Discharge for Medically Distressed Debtors

prominently featuredmoderately complex

This section amends the Bankruptcy Code to make student loans dischargeable for medically distressed debtors without requiring them to prove 'undue hardship.' Currently, student loans are notoriously difficult to discharge in bankruptcy, requiring debtors to meet a stringent 'undue hardship' standard. This change would allow medically distressed debtors to include student loans in their bankruptcy discharge, providing a more comprehensive fresh start.

Section 8(a) and (b), Sections 605(a) and 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act

Exclusion of Medically Distressed Debtor Bankruptcies from Consumer Reports

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act to prohibit consumer reporting agencies from including any information related to the bankruptcy of a medically distressed debtor in consumer reports. This means that a bankruptcy filed by someone meeting the 'medically distressed debtor' criteria would not appear on their credit report, preventing long-term damage to their credit score and future access to credit.

FOUND

This section requires any debtor seeking relief as a 'medically distressed debtor' to file a statement, under penalty of perjury, declaring that their medical expenses were not incurred for the purpose of bringing themselves within the meaning of the 'medically distressed debtor' definition.

Section 7, Section 521 of title 11, United States Code

Why it matters:This is standard legislative practice for including anti-abuse provisions. It's a mechanism to ensure the integrity of the new debtor category without making it a central, highly visible part of the bill's stated benefits.

Case for: Supporters would argue that this attestation is a necessary safeguard to prevent fraudulent claims and ensure that the enhanced bankruptcy protections are genuinely used by those facing legitimate medical hardship, thereby maintaining the integrity of the bankruptcy system.

Case against: Critics might suggest that this adds another layer of complexity and potential legal risk for already distressed debtors, who may need legal counsel to navigate the implications of such a sworn statement, potentially increasing the cost and stress of filing.

Estimated impact: This provision has a low direct financial impact but a high impact on the integrity and enforceability of the 'medically distressed debtor' status, serving as a deterrent against abuse.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Buried treasure
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
  • Implementation
  • Political analysis
Ask Ledger AI about this