The Capitol LedgerEvery move in Congress, on the record
HomeBillsRecordsLedger AI

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

AboutFAQFeedbackTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

The Capitol Ledger

Built from the Congressional Record and Congress.gov. Every summary links to its source.

The projectAboutFAQFeedback
LegalTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Follow us onlineInstagram

Summaries are AI-generated from primary sources. Verify anything important against the original record.

All bills
H.R. 9692·119th Congress·Introduced Jul 14, 2026

TOTAL Screen Time Act

IntroducedSubstantive
View bill text
Sponsor
Rep. Whitesides, George [D-CA-27]
Committees
Science, Space, and Technology Committee (primary)
Last action
Jul 14, 2026

Bottom line

This bill directs NIST to facilitate the creation of a voluntary, privacy-focused technical standard for parents to manage minors' screentime across multiple devices.

What it actually does

This bill mandates the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to convene stakeholders and support the development of a voluntary technical standard for setting screentime limits across various electronic devices. The standard must include an authentication model for minors and their parents, minimize data exchange, avoid centralized databases of minor activity, and not compromise device cybersecurity. NIST is also required to report biennially on the standard's development and adoption.

Proponents argue

Supporters argue this bill addresses growing public health concerns about excessive screentime among minors by promoting a standardized, privacy-conscious tool for parents to manage device usage effectively. They contend it empowers families without imposing mandates, fostering industry collaboration for a common solution that protects both children and their data.

Opponents contend

Critics might argue that mandating NIST to develop a 'voluntary' standard represents an unnecessary government intervention into private technology development and parental choices. They could also express concerns that any standard, even voluntary, could inadvertently lead to data collection risks or stifle innovation in device features, despite the bill's safeguards.

The bill is very short and straightforward, allowing for a quick and comprehensive understanding of its provisions.

Section 2(a)

Development of Voluntary Technical Standard for Screentime Limits

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section requires the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to solicit public comment and convene various stakeholders within 180 days of the bill's enactment. The goal is to support the development of a voluntary technical standard for setting screentime limits across covered devices. The standard must include an authentication and authorization model for minors and their parents, minimize data exchange, avoid centralized databases of minor activity, and not compromise device cybersecurity.

GroupImpactMechanismScale
GroupNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)ImpactMandated to lead a new standard development initiative.MechanismStatutory requirement to solicit public comment and convene stakeholders.ScaleNew, ongoing responsibility.
GroupTechnology Developers (of covered devices)ImpactInvited to participate in standard development; potential future adoption of standard.MechanismParticipation in stakeholder meetings, potential influence on future product design.ScaleIndustry-wide, voluntary.
GroupParents and Guardians of MinorsImpactPotential access to a standardized tool for managing screentime.MechanismFuture availability of devices implementing the voluntary standard.ScaleBroad, potential benefit.
GroupMinorsImpactPotential for more consistent and manageable screentime limits across devices.MechanismDevice features based on the voluntary standard.ScaleBroad, potential impact on daily digital habits.

Supporters argue

Supporters argue this provision is crucial for addressing the public health concerns associated with excessive screentime for minors. By fostering a voluntary, privacy-preserving standard, it provides parents with effective tools to manage their children's digital consumption across various devices without imposing burdensome regulations on industry.

Critics contend

Critics might contend that while the intent is good, a 'voluntary' standard developed by a government agency could still create de facto pressure on industry, potentially stifling innovation or leading to a one-size-fits-all approach that doesn't account for diverse family needs or technological advancements.

Tradeoffs

The provision balances the desire for parental control over screentime and the need for industry flexibility and innovation. It also navigates the tension between creating a useful standard and ensuring user privacy by explicitly prohibiting centralized data collection.

Section 2(b)

Stakeholder Engagement

prominently featuredstraightforward

This subsection specifies the diverse group of stakeholders NIST must convene for the development of the voluntary technical standard. This includes government agencies like the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, the FTC Chair, the Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board, and the Surgeon General. It also mandates the inclusion of private sector entities such as developers of covered devices, medical professional organizations treating minors, privacy and minor safety advocacy groups, and international standards organizations, along with any other entity NIST deems appropriate.

Section 2(c)

Reporting Requirements

prominently featuredstraightforward

This section mandates that NIST submit a report to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and publish it publicly. The initial report is due one year after enactment, and subsequent reports are due biennially thereafter until January 1, 2032. These reports must detail the progress of the standard's development and adoption, and include any recommendations from NIST to support further development and adoption.

About this analysis. AI-Generated from the official bill text and available committee reports. Gaps in available data are noted explicitly. Verify important details with the official Congress.gov record.

On this page

  • Executive summary
  • Key provisions
  • Follow the money
  • Critical analysis
  • Questions to ask
Ask Ledger AI about this